Modeling individuals' consideration of strategies to cope with congestion

Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 141-165

  Raney, Elizabeth A ^c   Mokhtarian, Patricia L ^a   Salomon, Ilan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Congestion; Logit models; Travel behavior

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009302962     PISSN: 13698478     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1369-8478(00)00022-X     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Baldassare M. Transportation in suburbia: trends in attitudes, behaviors and policy preferences in Orange County, California. Transportation. 18:1991;207-222.
2. Cervero R. Congestion, growth, and public choices. Berkeley Planning Journal. 3(2):1987-88;55-75.
3. Dowling R.G., Colman S.B. Effects of increased highway capacity: results of household travel behavior survey. Transportation Research Record. 1493:1995;143-149.
4. Giuliano G. New directions for understanding transportation and land use. Environment and Planning A. 21:1989;145-159.
5. Giuliano, G., & Small, K. A. (1995). Alternative strategies for coping with traffic congestion. In H. Giersch (Ed.), Urban agglomeration and economic growth (pp. 199-226). Berlin: Springer-verlag.
6. Hauser J.R. Testing the accuracy, usefulness, and significance of probabilistic choice models: an information-theoretic approach. Operations Research. 26(3):1978;406-421.
7. Humphrey T.F. Suburban congestion: recommendations for transportation and land use responses. Transportation. 16:1990;221-240.
8. Madden J. Why do women work closer to home? Urban Studies. 18:1981;181-194.
9. Mahmassani, H. S., & Jou, R.-C. (1998). Bounded rationality in commuter decision dynamics: incorporating trip chaining in departure time and route switching decisions. In T. Garling, T. Laitila, & K. Westin (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of travel choice modeling (pp. 201-229). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
10. Marshall S., Banister D. Travel reduction strategies: intentions and outcomes. Transportation Research A. 34(5):2000;321-338.
11. Mokhtarian P.L., Raney E.A., Salomon I. Behavioral responses to congestion: identifying patterns and socio-economic differences in adoption. Transport Policy. 4(3):1997;147-160.
12. Mokhtarian P.L., Salomon I. Modeling the choice of telecommuting: setting the context. Environment and Planning A. 26(5):1994;749-766.
13. Mokhtarian P.L., Salomon I. Modeling the desire to telecommute: the importance of attitudinal factors in behavioral models. Transportation Research A. 31(1):1997;35-50.
14. Mokhtarian, P. L., & Salomon, I. (forthcoming). How derived is the demand for travel? Some conceptual and measurement considerations. Transportation Research A.
15. Peng, Z.-R., & Rajasekaran, U. (1999). Stated traveler responses to changes in commute conditions. Working paper, Department of Urban Planning, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
16. Raux, C., & Andan, O. (1997). Residential mobility and daily mobility: what are the ties? In P. Stopher, & M. Lee-Gosselin (Eds.), Understanding travel behaviour in an era of change (pp. 29-52). New York: Elsevier.
17. Salomon I., Mokhtarian P.L. Coping with congestion: understanding the gap between policy assumptions and behavior. Transportation Research D. 2(2):1997;107-123.
18. Salomon I., Mokhtarian P.L. What happens when mobility-inclined market segments face accessibility-enhancing policies? Transportation Research D. 3(3):1998;129-140.
19. Semyonov M., Lewin-Epstein N. Suburban labor markets, urban labor markets, and gender inequality in earnings. Sociological Quarterly. 32:1991;611-620.
20. Stern, E. (1998). Travel choice in congestions: modeling and research needs. In T. Garling, T. Laitila, & K. Westin (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of travel choice modeling (pp. 173-199). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
21. Tertoolen G., Van Kreveld D., Verstraten B. Psychological resistance against attempts to reduce private car use. Transportation Research A. 32(3):1998;171-181.
22. Vlek, C., & Steg, L. (1996). Societal reasons, conditions, and policy strategies for reducing the use of motor vehicles. In Towards Sustainable Transportation. Proceedings of an international conference held in Vancouver, Canada, 25-27 March. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.