Holistic knowledge for appropriate professional development in early childhood education

Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 66-81

  Morgaine, Carol A ^a  

^a PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009111868     PISSN: 10901027     EISSN: 17455642     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1090102960170208     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., Tarule, J. M. (1986) Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice and mind. New York: Basic Books.
2. Biesta, G. J. J. (1994). Education as practical inter subjectivity: Toward a critical-pragmatic understanding of education. Educational Theory. 44(31). 299-317.
3. Bloch, M. N. (1992). Critical perspectives on the historical relationships between child development and early childhood research. In S. Kessler & B. B. Swadener (Eds), Reconceptualizina the early childhood curriculum: Beginning the dialogue. (pp 3-20), New York: Teacher’s College Press.
4. Blumer, H. (1956). Sociological analysis and the ‘variable’. American Sociological Review. 21. 683-90.
5. Braybrooke, D. (1987). Philosophy of science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
6. Bredo, E., & Feinberg, W., (Eds.). (1982). Knowledge and values in social and educational research. Philadelphia PA: Temple University Press.
7. Brown, M. (1980). What is Home Economics Education? Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota Research and Development Center.
8. Brown, M. (1984), Junel. Needed: A critical science perspective in home economics. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Home Economics Association.
9. Brown, M. (1985). Philosophical studies of home economics in the United States. East Lansing, Ml: Michigan State University.
10. Buchman, M. (1990). Beyond the lonely, choosing will: Professional development in teacher thinking. Teachers College Record. 91 (4). 481-508.
11. Carr, W. & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: education, knowledge and action research. London: Falmer Press.
12. Caruso, J. J. (1977). Phases in student teaching. Young Children. 33 57-63.
13. Chodorow, N. (1978). The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley. CA: University of California Press.
14. Ellsworth, E. (1989). Why doesn’t this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review. 59(31). 297-324.
15. Fay, B. (1977). How people change themselves: The relationship between critical theory and its audience. In T. Ball (Ed.). Political theory and praxis: New perspectives (pp. 200-233). Minneapolis, MNH: University of Minnesota Press.
16. Fennimore, B. S. (1989). Child advocacy for early childhood educators. New York: Teachers College Press.
17. Freire, P. (1968). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.
18. Fuller, F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal. 6(2). 207-226.
19. Grumet, M. R. (1989). Generations: Reconceptualist curriculum theory and teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education. 40(11).13-17.
20. Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and human interests. (J. Shapiro, Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
21. Habermas, J. (1979). Communication and the evolution of society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
22. Jalongo, M. K. (1992). Teachers’ stories: Our ways of knowing. Education Leadership. 49 (7), 68-73.
23. Jungck, S. & Marshall, J. D. (1992). Curriculum perspectives on One Great Debate. In S. Kessler & B. B. Swadener (Eds), Reconceptualizing the early childhood curriculum: Beginning the dialogue, (pp 93-102), New York: Teacher’s College Press.
24. King, N. R. (1992).The impact of context on the play of young children. In S. Kessler & B. B. Swadener (Eds), Reconceptualizing the early childhood curriculum: Beginning the dialogue, (pp. 43-61), New York: Teacher’s College Press.
25. Miller, A. (1983). For Your Own Good. New York, NY: Farrar, Strauss, & Giroux.
26. Miller, J. L. (1992). Teachers, autobiography and curriculum: Critical and feminist perspectives. In S. Kessler & B. B. Swadener (Eds), Reconceptualizing the early childhood curriculum: Beginning the dialogue, (pp 103-122), New York: Teacher’s College Press.
27. Morgaine, C. (1993). Personal transformation: The cornerstone of mission implementation in home economics teacher education. Journal of Vocational Home Economics Education. 11(21). 1-13.
28. Noar, G. (1981). Sensitizing teachers to ethic groups. New York, NY: Allyn & Bacon.
29. Pinderhughes, E. B. (1988). Significance of culture and power in the human behavior curriculum. In C. Jacobs & D. D. Bowles (Eds.) Ethnicity and race: Critical concepts in social work. Silver Springs, MD: National Association of Social Workers.
30. Prilleltensky, I. (1990). Enhancing the social ethics of psychology: Toward a psychology at the service of social change. Canadian Psychology. 31 (4), 310-319.
31. Rust, F. O. (1994). From the child’s point of view: A preliminary report on an assignment designed to promote critical reflection in teacher education. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education. 15(3). 3-6.
32. Sarfatti, L. M. (1977)The rise of professionalism: A sociological analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
33. Sheham, C. Berardo, F., & Lee, G. (1988, November). Families as social forces: Theoretical and empirical issues in viewing family-related behavior as independent or intervening variables. Paper presented at the pre-conference workshop on theory and research, National Council on Family Relations, Philadelphia.
34. Smith, M. G. (1992). Moral responsibility: A global perspective and the mission of home economics. Paper presented at the Canadian Home Economics Association Conference, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, July 14.
35. Taylor, P. W. (1961). Normative discourse. Englewood Cliffs, NY: Prentice Hall.
36. Witherell, C. & Noddings, N. (Eds.). (1991). Stories lives tell: Narrative and dialogues in education. New York: Teachers College Press.
37. Zimiles, H. (1993). The adoration of “hard data”. A case study of date fetishism in the evaluation of Infant Day Care. Early Childhood Research Quarterly. 8 369-385