'What do you think about...?': Generating views in an interview

Text

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 587-608

  Rapley, Mark ^a   Antaki, Charles ^b  

^a MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Community; Conversation analysis; Cover identities; Discretion; Institutional talk.; Particularization; Perspective display series; Research interviews

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009109134     PISSN: 01654888     EISSN: 18607349     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/text.1.1998.18.4.587     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Agar, M. H. and Hobbs, J. R. (1982). Interpreting discourse: Coherence and the analysis of ethnographic interviews. Discourse Processes 5: 1-32
2. Antaki, C. and Rapley, M. (1996). 'Quality of Life' talk: The liberal paradox of psychological testing. Discourse and Society 7: 293-316
3. Atkinson, J. M. and Heritage, J. (eds.) (1984). Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
4. Bergmann, J. R. (1992). Veiled morality: Notes on discretion in psychiatry. In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds.), 137-162. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
5. Billig, M. [1987] (1996). Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
6. Brenner, M. (1978). Interviewing: The social phenomenology of a research instrument. In The Social Contexts of Method, M. Brenner, P. Marsh and M. Brenner (eds.), XX-XX. London: Croom Helm
7. - (1981). Patterns of social structure in the research interview. In Social Method and Social Life, M. Brenner (ed.), 201-230. New York: Academic Press
8. Briggs, C. L. (1986). Learning How to Ask: A Sociolinguistic Appraisal of the Role of the Interview in Social Science Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
9. Button, G. (1992). Answers as interactional products: Two sequential practices used in interviews. In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds.), 212-231. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
10. Buttny, R. (1996). Clients' and therapists' joint construction of the clients' problems. Research on Language and Social Interaction 29: 125-153
11. Chavis, D. M. and Wandersman, A. (1990). Sense of community in the urban-environment-a catalyst for participation and community development. American Journal of Community Psychology 18: 55-77
12. Cicourel, A. W. (1982). Interviews, surveys, and the problem of ecological validity. American Sociologist 17: 193-202
13. Clayman, S. E. (1992). Footing in the achievement of neutrality: The case of news-interview discourse. In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, P. Drew and J. Heritage(eds.), 163-198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
14. DeVault, M. L. (1990). Talking and listening from women's standpoint: Feminist strategies for interviewing and analysis. Social Problems 37: 96-116
15. Drew, P. and Heritage, J. (1992). Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
16. Edwards, D. and Mercer, N. M. (1987). Common Knowledge: The Development of Understanding in the Classroom. London: Methuen
17. Harper, D. J. (1994). The professional construction of 'paranoia' and the discursive use of diagnostic criteria. British Journal of Medical Psychology 67: 131-143
18. Heritage, J. (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In Structures of Social Action, J. Maxwell Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds.), 299-345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
19. Hester, S. and Francis, D. (1994). Doing data-the local organization of a sociological interview. British Journal of Sociology 45: 675-695
20. Labov, W. (1972). Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society 1: 97-120
21. Maynard, D. W. (1991). The Perspective-display series and the delivery and receipt of diagnostic news. In Talk and Social Structure, D. Boden and D. H. Zimmerman (eds.), 164-192. Cambridge: Polity Press
22. - (1992). On clinicians co-implicating recipients' perspective in the delivery of diagnostic news. In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds.), 331-358. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
23. Mishler, E. G. (1986). Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
24. Myers, G. (1998). Displaying opinions: Topics and disagreement in focus groups. Language in Society 27: 85-111
25. Pomerantz, A. M. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies 9: 219-230
26. Potter, J. and Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage
27. Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on Conversation, Vols. 1 and 2. [Edited by Gail Jefferson] Oxford: Basil Blackwell
28. Schegloff, E. A. (1988). On an actual virtual servo-mechanism for guessing bad news: A single case conjecture. Social Problems 35 (4): 442-457
29. Silverman, D. (1993). Interpreting Qualitative Data. London: Sage
30. Suchman, L. A. and Jordan, B. (1990). Interactional trouble in face-to-face survey interviews. Journal of the American Statistical Association 85: 232-244
31. Widdicombe, S. and Wooffitt, R. (1994). The Language of Youth Subculture. Brighton: Harvester