The empirical investigation of factors affecting graphical visualization

Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 265-269

  Jones, Russell W ^a   Careras, Ismael E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009029395     PISSN: 07433808     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03204778     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION (1982). Preparation of manuscripts for ASA journals. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77, 226-229.
2. APPLE COMPUTER (1989). HyperCard [Computer program]. Cupertino, CA: Author.
3. CLEVELAND, W. S. (1984). Graphs in scientific publications. American Statistician, 38, 261-269.
4. CLEVELAND, W. S. (1985). The elements of graphing data. Monterey, CA: Wadsworth.
5. CLEVELAND, W. S., & MCGILL, R. (1984). The many faces of a scatterplot. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 807-822.
6. CLEVELAND, W. S., & MCGILL, R. (1986). An experiment in graphical perception. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 25, 491-500.
7. Cox, D. R. (1978). Some remarks on the role in statistics of graphical methods. Applied Statistics, 27, 4-9.
8. CROXTON, F. E., & STRYKER, R. E. (1927). Bar charts versus circle diagrams. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 22, 473-482.
9. CULBERTSON, H. M., & POWERS, R. D. (1959). A study of graph comprehension difficulties. Audio-Visual Communication Review, 7, 97-100.
10. DEMPSEY, J. V., FISHER, S., & MAROUSKY, R. (1994). Preference and use of information in instructional graphs. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Consortium for Instruction and Cognition, New Orleans.
11. EELLS, W. C. (1926). The relative merits of circles and bars for representing component parts. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 21, 119-132.
12. EHRENBERG, A. S. C. (1977). Rudiments of numeracy. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A, 140, 277-297.
13. FEENEY, M. (1994, March 11). Beyond the voodoo stick: If a picture is worth a thousand words, how many words is an information graphic worth? Boston Globe Magazine, pp. 10-18.
14. KOSSLYN, S. M. (1985). Graphics and human information processing. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 80, 499-512.
15. KRUSKAL, W. H. (1982). Criteria for judging statistical graphics. Utilitas Mathematica, 21B, 283-310.
16. LEWANDOWSKY, S., & SPENCE, I. (1989). The perception of statistical graphs. Sociological Methods & Research, 18, 200-241.
17. LOHSE, G., WALKER, N., BIOLSI, K., & REUTER, H. (1991). Classifying graphical information. Behaviour & Information Technology, 10, 419-436.
18. MAYR, G. (1874). Gutrachten über die Anwendung der graphischen und geographischen Methoden in der Statistik. Munich: J. Gotteswinter & Mossl.
19. MORLEY, S., & ADAMS, M. (1991). Graphical analysis of single case time series data. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 30, 97-115.
20. PETERSON, L. V., & SCHRAMM, W. (1955). How accurately are different kinds of graph read? Audio-Visual Communication Review, 2, 178-189.
21. SCHMID, C. F. (1983). Statistical graphics. New York: Wiley.
22. TUFTE, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
23. TUFTE, E. R. (1990). Envisioning information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.