Receiving Two Consequences: Tests of Monotonicity and Scale Invariance

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Volumn 83, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 61-81

  Cho, Young Hee ^a   Fisher, Gerald R ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BIOLA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009029175     PISSN: 07495978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/obhd.2000.2902     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Birnbaum M. H. Violations of monotonicity in judgment and decision making. Marley A. A. J. Choice, decision, and measurement: essays in honor of R. Duncan Luce. 1997;73-100 Erlbaum, Mahwah.
2. Birnbaum M. H., Sutton S. E. Scale convergence and utility measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 52:1992;183-215.
3. Budescu D. V., Weiss W. Reflection of transitive and intransitive preferences: A test of prospect theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 39:1987;184-202.
4. Cho Y., Luce R. D. Tests of assumptions about certainty equivalents and joint receipt of lotteries. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 64:1995;229-248.
5. Cho Y., Luce R. D., von Winterfeldt D. Tests of assumptions about joint receipt of lotteries in rank- and sign-dependent utility theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 20:1994;931-943.
6. Fishburn P. C., Kochenberger G. A. Two-piece von Neumann-Morgenstein utility functions. Decision Sciences. 10:1979;503-518.
7. Lichtenstein S., Slovic P. Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 89:1971;46-55.
8. Linville P. W., Fischer G. W. Preference for separating or combining events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 60:1991;5-23.
9. Luce R. D. Rank-and sign-dependent linear utility models for binary lotteries. Journal of Economic Theory. 53:1991;75-100.
10. Luce R. D. Associative joint receipt. Mathematical Social Science. 34:1997;51-74.
11. Luce R. D. Utility of gains and losses: Measurement-theoretic and experimental approaches. 2000;Erlbaum, Mahwah.
12. Luce R. D., Fishburn P. C. Rank- and sign-dependent linear utility models for finite first-order lotteries. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 4:1991;29-59.
13. Luce R. D., Fishburn P. C. A note on deriving rank-dependent utility using additive joint receipts. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 10:1995;5-16.
14. Payne J. W., Braunstein M. L. Preferences among lotteries with equal underlying distributions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 87:1971;13-18.
15. Slovic P., Lichtenstein S. Importance of variance preferences in gambling decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 78:1968;646-654.
16. Sneddon, R. (, 2000), Order preservation of PEST determined certainty equivalents: A test based on lotteries with a fixed preference strength. Manuscript submitted for publication.
17. Sneddon, R, &, Luce, R. D. (in press), Empirical comparisons of bilinear and nonlinear utility theories, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.
18. Thaler R. Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science. 4:1985;199-214.
19. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 5:1992;204-217.
20. von Winterfeldt D., Chung N., Luce R. D., Cho Y. Tests of consequence monotonicity in decision making under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 23:1997;406-426.
21. Wakker P., Tversky A. An axiomatization of cumulative prospect theory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 7:1993;147-176.