Cohesion in discourse of college-educated and non-college-educated adults: Implications for young adults with brain injury

International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 97-107

  Youse, Kathleen M ^a,b   Stout, Connie E ^a   Bosworth, Karyn E ^a  

^a OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009021785     PISSN: 17549515     EISSN: 17549507     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/14417040109003717     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Adamovich, B., & Henderson, J. (1992). Screening for cognitive abilities in traumatic brain injury. Chicago: Riverside.
2. Cherney, L. R (1998). Cohesion analyses. In L. R. Cherney B. Shadden, & C. A. Coelho (Eds.), Analyzing discourse in communicatively impaired adults (p. 2). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
3. Coelho, C. A. (1999). Discourse analysis in traumatic brain injury. In S. McDonald, S., L. Togher, & C. Code (Eds.), Communication disorders following traumatic brain injury (pp. 55-79). East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
4. Coelho, C. A., Liles, B. Z., & Duffy, R. J. (1991a). Analysis of conversational discourse in head injured adults. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 6(2), 92-99.
5. Coelho, C. A., Liles, B. Z., & Duffy, R. J. (1991b). The use of discourse analysis for the evaluation of higher level traumatically brain-injured adults. Brain Injury, 5(4), 381-392.
6. Coelho, C. A., Liles, B. Z., & Duffy, R. J. (1994). Cognitive framework: A description of discourse abilities in traumatically brain injured adults. In R. L. Bloom, L. K. Obler, S. De Santi, & J. S. Ehrlich (Eds.), Discourse analysis and applications: Studies in adult clinical populations (pp. 95-110). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Coelho, C. A., Liles, B. Z., & Duffy, R. J. (1995). Impairments of discourse abilities and executive functions in traumatically brain-injured adults. Brain Injury, 9(5), 471-477.
8. Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1983). The Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination. Boston: Lea & Febiger.
9. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
10. Hartley, L. L., & Jensen, P. J. (1991). Narrative and procedural discourse after closed head injury. Brain Injury, 5(3), 267-285.
11. Helm-Estabrooks, N., & Holtz, G. (1990). Brief Test of Head Injury. Chicago: Riverside Publishing Company.
12. Hunt, K. W. (1965). Grammatical structures written at three grade levels (Research Report No. 3). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
13. Jacobs, H. E. (1988). The Los Angeles head injury survey: Procedures and initial findings. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 69, 425-431.
14. Liles, B. Z. (1985). Cohesion in the discourse of normal and language disordered children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28, 123-133. (Pubitemid 15106367)
15. Liles, B. Z., & Coelho, C. A. (1998). Cohesion analyses. In L. R. Cherney, B. Shadden, & C. A. Coelho (Eds.), Analyzing discourse in communicatively impaired adults (pp. 65-83). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
16. Liles, B. Z., Coelho, C. A., Duffy, R. J., & Zalagens, M. R. (1989). Effects of elicitation procedures on the narratives of normal and closed head-injured adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 356-366. (Pubitemid 19206801)
17. Mentis, M., & Prutting, C. A. (1987). Cohesion in the discourse of normal and head-injured adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 30, 88-98. (Pubitemid 17036281)
18. McDonald, S., Togher, L., & Code, C. (1999). The nature of traumatic brain injury: Basic features and neuropsychological consequences. In S. McDonald, L. Togher, & C. Code (Eds.), Communication disorders following traumatic brain injury (pp. 19-54). East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
19. Nicholas, L. E., & Brookshire, R. H. (1993). A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36(2), 338-350. (Pubitemid 23123567)
20. Scott, C. (1994). A discourse continuum for school-age students. In G. Wallach & K. Butler (Eds.), Language learning disabilities in school-age children and adolescents: Some principles and applications (pp. 219-252). New York: Macmillan.
21. Snow, P., Douglas, J., & Ponsford, J. (1995). Discourse assessment following traumatic brain injury: A pilot study examining some demographic and methodological issues. Aphasiology, 9(4), 365-380.
22. Snow, P., Douglas, J., & Ponsford, J. (1997). Conversational assessment following traumatic brain injury: A comparison of two control groups. Brain Injury, 11(6), 409-429. (Pubitemid 27229207)
23. Snow, P., Douglas, J., & Ponsford, J. (1998). Conversational discourse abilities following severe traumatic brain injury: A follow-up study. Brain Injury, 22(11), 911-935. (Pubitemid 28521764)
24. Togher, L., & Hand, L. (1998). Use of politeness markers with different communication partners: An investigation of five subjects with traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology, 12(7/8), 775-779.
25. Ylvisaker, M., & Szekeres, S. F. (1989). Metacognitive and executive impairments in head injured children and adults. Topics in Language Disorders, 9(2), 34-49.