The impact of welfare reform on labour supply behaviour in New Zealand

Labour Economics

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 427-448

  Maloney, Tim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Economic reform; I38; J22; J26; Labour supply; New Zealand; Retirement; Synthetic panel data; Welfare

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009007260     PISSN: 09275371     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0927-5371(00)00006-3     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Bean C. European unemployment: a survey. Journal of Economic Literature. 32(2):1994;573-619.
2. Burtless G. Unemployment insurance and labor supply: a survey. Hansen W.L., Byers J. Unemployment Insurance: The Second Half Century. 1990;The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.
3. Evans L., Grimes A., Wilkinson B., Teece D. Economic reform in New Zealand 1984-95: the pursuit of efficiency. Journal of Economic Literature. 34(4):1996;1856-1902.
4. Fraker T., Moffitt R. The effect of food stamps on labor supply: a bivariate selection model. Journal of Public Economics. 35:1988;25-56.
5. Killingsworth M. Labor Supply. 1983;Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
6. Maloney T. Benefit Reform and Labour Market Behaviour in New Zealand. 1997;Institute for Policy Studies, Victoria University, Wellington.
7. Micklewright J. Unemployment and incentives to work: policy and evidence in the 1980's. Hart P.E. Unemployment and Labour Market Policies. 1986;104-120 National Institute of Economic and Social Research, Gower, England.
8. Minford P. Unemployment: Cause and Cure. 1983;Martin Robinson, Oxford.
9. Moffitt R. Demographic behavior and the welfare state: econometric issues in the identification of the effects of tax and transfer programs. Journal of Population Economics. 1:1989;237-250.
10. Moffitt R. Incentive effects of the U.S. welfare system. Journal of Economic Literature. 30(1):1992;1-61.
11. Silverstone B., Bollard A., Lattimore R. A Study of Economic Reform: The Case of New Zealand, Amsterdam: North-Holland. 1996.
12. Verbeek M., Nijman T. Can cohort data be treated as genuine panel data? Empirical Economics. 17(1):1992;9-23.