Descriptive analysis of fifth grade division instruction in basal mathematics programs: Violations of pedagogy

Journal of Behavioral Education

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 381-403

  Jitendra, Asha ^a   Carnine, Douglas ^b   Silbert, Jerry ^b  

^a LEHIGH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

Basal mathematics programs; Mathematics; Teaching

Indexed keywords

EID: 0008987303     PISSN: 10530819     EISSN: 15733513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02110513     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bishop, A. J. (1990). Mathematical power to the people. Harvard Educational Review, 60, 357-369.
2. Brophy, J. (1990). Teaching social studies for understanding and higher-order applications. Elementary School Journal, 90, 351-417.
3. Carnine, D., Dixon, R., & Silbert, J. (in press). Design considerations for mathematics. In E. Kameenui and D. Carnine (Eds.), Strategies for teaching students with diverse learning needs. New York: Merrill.
4. Camine, D., Engelmann, S., Hofmeister, A., & Kelly, B. (1987). Videodisc instruction in fractions. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 9, 31-52.
5. Camine, D., Jones, E. D., & Dixon, R. (1994). Mathematics: Educational tools for diverse learners. School Psychology Review, 23, 402-423.
6. Carnine, D., Kameenui, E., Dimino, J., Davis, G., Carnine, L., Kelly, B., & Silbert, J. (1992). Teachers' perceptions of the quality of elementary mathematics basal textbooks. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon.
7. Courtland, M. C., Farr, R., Harris, P., Tarr, J. R., & Treece, L. J. (1983). A case study of the Indiana state reading textbook adoption process. Unpublished manuscript, Indiana University at Bloomington.
8. Cybriwsky, C. A., & Schuster, J. W. (1990). Using constant time delay procedures to teach multiplication facts. Remedial and Special Education, 11, 54-59.
9. Darch, D., Carnine, D., Gersten, R. (1984). Explicit instruction in mathematics problem solving. Journal of Educational Research, 77, 350-359.
10. Dempster, F. N. (1991). Synthesis of research on reviews and tests. Educational Leadership, 4, 71-76.
11. Dixon, R. (1992). Research on improving mathematics instruction for low-performing students. Eugene: University of Oregon, Center for the Study of Improving Math Instruction.
12. Farr, R., Tulley, M. A., & Powell, D. (1987). The evaluation and selection of readers. Elementary School Journal, 87, 267-282.
13. Gickling, E. E., & Thompson, V. P. (1985). A personal view of curriculum-based assessment. Exceptional Children, 52, 205-218.
14. Gleason, M., Carnine, D., & Boriero, D. (1990). Improving CAI effectiveness with attention to instructional design in teaching story problems to mildly handicapped students. Journal of Special Education Technology, 10, 129-136.
15. Good, T. L., Grouws, D. A., & Ebmeier, H. (1983). Active mathematics teaching. New York: Longman.
16. Kameenui, E. J., Carnine, D., Darch, C., & Stein, M. (1986). Two approaches to the development of mathematics instruction. Elementary School Journal, 86, 633-651.
17. Kelly, B., Gersten, R., & Carnine, D. (1990). Student error patterns as a function of curriculum design: Teaching fractions to remedial high school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 23-29.
18. Mayer, R. E., Sims, V., & Tajika, H. (1995). A comparison of how textbooks teach mathematical problem solving in Japan and the United States. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 442-460.
19. Moore, L., & Carnine, D. (1989). Evaluating curriculum design in the context of active teaching. Remedial and Special Education, 10(4), 28-37.
20. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
21. Osborn, J. H., Jones, B. F., & Stein, M. (1985). The case for improving textbooks. Educational Leadership, 42(1), 9-16.
22. Paine, S. C., Carnine, D. W., White, W. A. T., & Walters, G. (1982). Effects of fading teacher presentation structure (covertization) on acquisition and maintenance of arithmetic problem-solving skills. Education and Treatment of Children, 5(2), 93-107.
23. Porter, A. (1989). A curriculum out of balance: The case of elementary school mathematics. Educational Researcher, 18, 9-15.
24. Prawat, R. (1989). Promoting access to knowledge, strategy, and disposition in students: A research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 59, 1-41.
25. Pressley, M., Symons, S., Snyder, B. L., & Cariglia-Bull, T. (1989). Strategy instruction research comes of age. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 12, 16-30.
26. Powell, D. A. (1986). Selection of reading textbooks at the district level: Is this a rational process? Book Research Quarterly, 1(3), 23-35.
27. Tulley, M., & Farr, R. (1985). The purpose of state level textbook adoption: What does the legislation reveal? Journal of Research and Development in Education, 18(2), 1-6.
28. Silbert, J., Carnine, D., & Stein, M. (1990). Direct instruction mathematics (2nd ed.). New York: Merrill.
29. Swing, S., & Peterson, P. (1988). Elaborative and integrative thought processes in mathematics learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 54-66.
30. Woodward, J., Carnine, D., Gersten, R., Gleason, M., Johnson, G., & Collines, M. (1985). Applying instructional design principles to CIA for mildly handicapped students: Four recently conducted studies. Journal of Special Education Technology, 8, 13-26.