Japan's Images of China in the 1990s: Are They Ready for China's ‘Smile Diplomacy’ or Bush's ‘Strong Diplomacy’?

Japanese Journal of Political Science

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 97-125

  Rozman, Gilbert ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0008867938     PISSN: 14681099     EISSN: 14740060     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1468109901000159     Document Type: Article

References (111)

1. ‘Zhu Rongji no “bisho” no imi’, Sentaku, November 2000, pp. 32–33.
2. Asahi shimbun, 21 October 1999, p. 4. In an interview in Beijing Asahi's political observer was told that China is ready ‘to throw a peach and get back a pear’ in an attempt to shift relations mired in doubt and distrust from ‘emotions’ to ‘national interests’.
3. Robert Zoellick, ‘A Republican Foreign Policy’, Foreign Affairs, January/February 2000, PP. 74–75.
4. Michael Green, ‘Preparing for New Teams in Tokyo and Washington’, Pacific Forum CSIS: Comparative Connections, 2, 4, January 2001.
5. Michael H. Armacost, Friends or Rivals? The Insider's Account of US-Japan Relations (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996), p. 140
6. On the Public Broadcasting System and in other media targeted at the elite in the US, there is no sympathy for Japanese explanations of the history of Sino-Japanese relations, although doubts are raised too about Chinese overreactions. The New York Times, 7 August 2000, p. A6.
7. James Pryzstup, ‘Japan-China Relations, April-June 2000, Old Issues … And New Approaches?’, Comparative Connections: An E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations, www.csis.org/pacfor, 21 July 2000, p. 1.
8. Sankei shimbun, 29 October 1999, p.3.
9. Asahi shimbun, 29 October 1999, p. 7.
10. Ronald Morse has published diagrams of Tokyo and Washington's shakers and movers on China. He used three concentric circles and placed individuals from four types of groups -Japanese politicians, business and lobbyists, Japanese bureaucrats, and media land and think tanks - in the four quadrants. Along the circumference of the outermost circle are those who are soft on China. At the center of the innermost circle are those who are hard. In the middle circle are those who fit neither extreme. In his very brief exposition, Morse did not explain what views he is calling soft or hard or why he classifies the various people listed as he does. Here I do not consider the American circle, and I subdivide the middle circle, which deserves even more attention than the extremes. Ronald Morse, Sankei shimbun, 3 August 1999, p. 4
11. Ryosei Kokubun, ‘The Current State of Contemporary Chinese Studies in Japan: A Research Note’, Tokyo: unpublished manuscript, 1984, p. 2.
12. The Japan Times Weekly International Edition, 18–24 October 1993, p. 20.
13. Masashi Nishihara, East Asian Security and the Trilateral Countries (New York: The Trilateral Commission, 1985), p. 22.
14. East Asian Security and the Trilateral Countries., p. 41.
15. Tanaka Akihiko, Nitchu kankei 1945–1990 (Tokyo: Tokyo University Press, 1991), pp. 166–167.
16. Gilbert Rozman (ed), Japan and Russia: The Tortuous Path to Normalization, 1949–1999 (New York: St. Martin's Press, 2000).
17. Tanaka Akihiko, ‘Tainichi kankei’, in Okabe Tatsuo (ed.), Chugoku soran 1992 (Tokyo, 1992), p. 120.
18. The Japan Times Weekly International Edition, 19–25 August 1991, p. 1.
19. Takashi Inoguchi, ‘Japan's Foreign Policy in East Asia’, Current History, December 1992, pp. 408, 410.
20. The Japan Times Weekly International Edition, 31 January-6 February 1994, p. 1.
21. Asahi shimbun, 12 August 1991, p. 1.
22. Kokubun Ryosei, ‘Jiang Zemin shi no honichi: tainichi seisaku henka no kizashi’, Toa, No. 6, 1992, pp. 2–3.
23. The Japan Times Weekly International Edition, 24–30 August, 1992, p. 3.
24. The Japan Times Weekly International Edition, 14–21 December 1998, p. 8.
25. The Japan Times Weekly International Edition, November 16–22,1992, p. 5
26. Qingxin Ken Wang, ‘Recent Japanese Economic Diplomacy in China: Political Alignment in a Changing World Order’, Asian Survey, 33, 6, June 1993, pp. 625–641.
27. Takashi Sugimoto, ‘Building a New Japan-China Relationship’, IIIGP Policy Paper 100E, September 1992, pp. 11 and 14.
28. Tatsumi Okabe, ‘Japan's Future China Policy China Committee Report-Volume 4’, IIGP Special Report, October 1990, p. 13.
29. Prime Minister's Office, ‘Public Opinion Survey on Diplomacy (Summary)’, Tokyo: Foreign Press Center, April 1995, p. 17.
30. Funabashi Yoichi, ‘Chugoku to no tsukiaikata o ayamaru na’, Chuo koron, July, 1998, pp. 36–38.
31. Shin'ichi Kitaoka, ‘Putting Old Diplomatic Principles into New Bottles’, Japan Echo, 21, 1, Spring 1994, pp. 66–67.
32. Akihiko Tanaka, ‘Hegemony, Chaos, Interdependence: Three Scenarios for China’, Japan Echo, 21, 3, Autumn 1994, pp. 43–45.
33. Okabe Tatsuo, ‘Ajia taiheiyo no naka no Nihon’, in Okabe Tatuso (ed.), Posuto reisen Ajia taiheiyo (Tokyo: Nihon kokusai mondai kenkyujo, 1995), pp. 1–24.
34. Tanaka Akihiko, ‘Tainichi kankei’, in Okabe Tatsuo (ed.), Chugoku soran 1996 (Tokyo, 1996), p. 132.
35. The Japan Times Weekly International Edition, 21–7 August 1995, pp. 1, 5, 6,1–7 June 1998, p. 3
36. Yomiuri Shimbun, 23 June 1995, p. 2.
37. Tanaka Akihiko, ‘Tainichi kankei’, in Okabe Tatsuo (ed.), Chugoku soran 1998 (Tokyo, 1998), pp. 138–149.
38. Yomiuri shimbun, 17 November 1995, p. 6.
39. Takazu Kuriyama, ‘The United States, Japan and China: What Kind of a Triangle?’ Japan INFO, December/January 1998, p. 1
40. The Japan Times International 16–28 February 1998, p. 19.
41. The Japan Times Weekly International Edition, 2–8 November 1998, p. 20.
42. Takashi Sugimoto, ‘Building A New Japan-China Relationship’, Tokyo: International Institute for Global Peace, Policy Paper 100E, September 1992, pp. 14, 25,31.
43. The Japan Times, 15 November 1992, p. 20.
44. Mizoguchi Yuzo et al., Kanji bunkaken no rekishi to mirai (Tokyo: Daishukan shoten, 1992).
45. Amako Satoshi and Shu Kenei, ‘Ajia no hendo no naka no “Nitchu 20 nen”’, Sekai, November 1992, pp. 295–297.
46. The Japan Times Weekly International Edition, 21–7 October 1996, p. 9.
47. The Japan Times Weekly International Edition, 28 August-3 September 1995, p. 8.
48. Economic Cooperation in Northeast Asia in the Era of the Pacific Rim (Niigata: Niigata University, Faculty of Economics, 1996).
49. Ishiyama Yoshihide, ‘Regional Routes to a New World Order’, Japan Echo, 19, 1, Spring 1992, pp. 16–22.
50. The Japan Times Weekly International Edition, 6–12 July 1992, p. 8; 11–17 January 1993, pp. 1, 6.
51. Mainichi Daily, 30 November 1994, p. 2.
52. Keizai kikakucho keizai kenkyujo (ed.), 21 seiki Chugoku no shinario (Tokyo, 1997).
53. Asahi shimbun, 24 November 1998, p. 8.
54. Ronald Morse, Sankei shimbun, 3 August 1999, p. 4, and unpublished tables from this article.
55. Anami Koreshige and Kojima Tomoyuki, ‘Nitchu kankei 21 seiki no bunmyaku de yomitoku’, Gaiko Forum, November 1998, pp. 28–32.
56. Hisahiro Kanayama, ‘East Asia and Japan: Japan's Diplomatic Strategy for Seeking Common Interests’, Tokyo: International Institute for Global Peace, Policy Paper 134E, September 1994, pp. 22–23.
57. Policy Paper 134E.,p. 23.
58. The Japan Times Weekly International Edition, 6 October-12 October 1997, last page.
59. Akihiko Tanaka, ‘Hegemony, Chaos, Interdependence: Three Scenarios for China’, Japan Echo, 21, 3, Autumn 1994, pp. 41–47.
60. Mainichi shimbun, 11 April 1999, p. 6.
61. Tanaka Akihiko, ‘97 nen, Beichu wa wakai suru’, Chuo koron, 2,1997, pp. 52–63.
62. Takashi Inoguchi, ‘Introduction: Japan's Asia Policy Resuscitated?’, Tokyo: unpublished manuscript, January 1999.
63. Kayahara Ikuo, Anzen hosho kara mita Chugoku (Tokyo: Keiso shobo, 1998).
64. Ronald Morse, Sankei shimbun, 3 August 1999, p. 4.
65. Asahi shimbun, 5 July 1999, p. 2.
66. Fujimura Kogi, ‘Chosen hanto to Han, Chu, Nichi, Bei’, Ajia to Nihon, 308,1999, pp. 17–18.
67. Asahi shimbun, 16 July 2000.
68. Sankei shimbun, 25 October 2000, p. 1.
69. Sankei shimbun, 14 November 2000, p. 3.
70. Asai Motofumi, Chugoku o do miru ka? (Tokyo: Kobunken, 2000).
71. Ijiri Hidenori, Amerikajin no Chugokukan (Tokyo: Bunshun shincho, 2000).
72. Tatsumi Okabe, ‘Japan's Future China Policy’, Tokyo: International Institute for Global Peace, Special Report, October 1990, p.13.
73. Interview with Seizaburo Sato, 16 November 1992.
74. Tatsumi Okabe, ‘Chinese Diplomacy and the International Environment’, Tokyo: paper for the Symposium of the Japanese Association for Asian Political and Economic Studies, October, 1999.
75. Sankei shimbun, 24 October 2000, p. 1.
76. The Japan Times International Edition, 1–15 April 1999, p. 20.
77. The Japan Times Weekly International Edition, 13–19 January 1992, p. 11,1–7 August 1994, p. 9.
78. Tanaka Akihiko, ‘Tainichi kankei’, Chugoku soran 2000 (Tokyo: Kasankai, 2000), pp. 138–144.
79. The Japan Times Weekly International Edition, 23–9 August 1993, p. 4
80. Inoguchi Takashi, ‘Nitchu kankei wa sekaiteki shiya de’, Gaiko forum, November 1992, p. 23.
81. Takebo Tadae, Oota Masatoshi, Hiramatsu Shigeo, Nihon gaiko no saitenken (Tokyo: Jiji tsushinsha, 2000), pp. 112–116.
82. Kent E. Calder, ‘The New Face of Northeast Asia’, Foreign Affairs, January/February 2001, pp. 106–122.
83. The Japan Times Weekly International Edition, 30 September-6 October 1996, p. 9.
84. The Japan Time Weekly International Edition, 9–15 November 1992, p. 9.
85. Kaneko Hidetoshi, ‘Tenno hochu no butai ura’, Ajia jiho, July 1992, pp. 2–3.
86. Nakajima Mineo, “Kyosan Chugoku’ hokai no yocho’, Voice, October 1999, pp. 62–71
87. ‘Chugoku kenkoku gojunen no sokatsu to sono shorai o yomu’, Ajia jiho, 349, September 1999, pp. 4–47.
88. Nihon to Chugoku ‘Doko ga chigau ka’ jiten (Tokyo: Nihon jitsugyo chubansha, 1989)
89. Inagaki Takeshi and Kaji Nobuyuki, Nihon to Chugoku eien no wakai: ibo hunka no chototsu (Tokyo: Bungeishunju.1999).
90. The Japan Times International Edition, 16–30 April 1999, pp. 1, 6.
91. Keijiro Tanaka, ‘Quo Vadis? China's Socialism and Market Economy’, IIPS News, Spring 1999, p. 4.
92. Sankei shimbun, 13,16, 30 October 2000, 22 November 2000, 8 December 2000.
93. Toyota Aritsune, Ii kagen ni shiro Chugoku (Tokyo: Shodensha, 2000), pp. 172–191.
94. Ii kagen ni shiro Chugoku., pp. 12–13.
95. Ii kagen ni shiro Chugoku., pp. 204–212.
96. ‘Seiji joho kapuseru’, Sentaku, November 2000, pp. 48–49.
97. James J. Pryzstup, ‘The Zhu Visit and After … Efforts to Steady the Course’, Pacific Forum CSIS: Comparative Connections, 2, 4, January 2001.
98. Arai Hirokazu, ‘Toajia ni okeru Nichibeichuro kankei’, Shin kokusaku, October 15, 2000, pp. 10–14.
99. Sankei shimbun, 30 October 2000, p. 1.
100. The Japan Times, 30 November 2000.
101. Teruya Kenkichi, ‘Chugoku ga nerau Higashishinakai no kaitei shigen’, Foresight, October 2000, pp. 80–83.
102. Koo Bunyu, Tsukeagam no Chugokujin urutaeru na Nihonjin (Tokyo: Tokuma shoten, 2000).
103. Kokubun Ryosei, “Shuno gaiko to Chugoku’, Kokusai mondai, January 1999, p. 15.
104. ‘Chugoku keizai kaikaku no sutoronguman Zhu Rongji’, Sekai, January 1998, pp. 155–165.
105. Ina Hikiyoshi, ‘Taichugoku Kitachosen gaiko wa kakuarubeshi’, Foresight, October 2000, pp. 58–61.
106. Takashi Inoguchi, ‘Japan's Foreign Policy under US Unipolarity: Coping with Uncertainty and Swallowing Some Bitterness’, Asian Journal of Political Science, 6, 2 (December 1998), pp. 3, 9.
107. ‘Nihon gaiko Taiwan Lee Teng-Hui soto no shosokan’, Sekai shuho, 31 August 1999, p. 28–29.
108. The New York Times, 30 December 1994, p. A7.
109. Tanaka Akihiko, ‘Shin seiken wa Jiang Zemin o do mukaeru no ka?’ Chuo koron, September 1998, pp. 60–69.
110. Funabashi Yoichi, ‘Chugoku to no tsukiaikata o ayamaru na’, pp. 44–45.
111. Mainichi shimbun, 20 July 1998, p. 8.