Visual categorization with aerial photographs

Annals of the Association of American Geographers

Volumn 92, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 241-266

  Lloyd, Robert ^a   Hodgson, Michael E ^a   Stokes, Audrey ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Aerial photographs; Categorization; Learning; Spatial cognition; Visual field

Indexed keywords

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH; COGNITION; LEARNING; VISUAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0008854831     PISSN: 00045608     EISSN: 14678306     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8306.00289     Document Type: Review

References (68)

1. Anderson, J., E. Hardy, J. Roach, and R. Witmer. 1976. A landuse and land-cover classification system for use with remote sensor data: Professional Paper 964. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey.
2. Annett, M. 1985. Left, right, hand, and brain: The right-shift theory. London: Erlbaum.
3. _. 1994. Handedness as a continuous variable with dextral shift: Sex, generation and family handedness in subgroups of left- and right-handers. Behavioral Genetics 24:51-63.
4. Barnfield, A. 1999. Development of sex differences in spatial memory. Perceptual and Motor Skills 89:339-50.
5. Bebko, J., K. Uchikawa, S. Saida, and M. Ideda. 1995. Learning to recognize patterns: Changes in the visual-field with familiarity. Optical Review 2:72-80.
6. Berg, W., and S. Killian. 1995. Size of the visual field in collegiate fast-pitch softball players and nonathletes. Perceptual and Motor Skills 81:1307-12.
7. Birenbaum, M., A. Kelly, and M. Levi-Keren. 1994. Stimulus features and sex differences in mental rotation test performance. Intelligence 19:51-64.
8. Blaut, J. 1997. Children can. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 87:152-58.
9. Bunch, R. 1999. Searching for color boundaries on maps. Southeastern Geographer 39:220-34.
10. Casey, M. 1996. Understanding individual differences in spatial ability within females: A nature/nurture interactionist framework. Developmental Review 16:241-60.
11. Chapman, P., and G. Underwood. 1998. Visual search of driving situations: Danger and experience. Perception 27:951-64.
12. Chun, M. 2000. Contextual cueing of visual attention. Trends in Cognitive Science 4:170-78.
13. Chun, M., and Y. Jiang. 1999. Top-down attentional guidance based on implicit learning of visual covariation. Psychological Science 10:360-65.
14. Clark, R. 1993. Men's and women's self-confidence in persuasive, comforting, and justificatory communicative tasks. Sex Roles 28:553-67.
15. Clifton, R., and D. Gill. 1994. Gender differences in self-confidence on a feminine-typed task. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 16:150-62.
16. Crundall, D., and G. Underwood. 1998. Effects of experience and processing demands on visual information acquisition in drivers. Ergonomics 41:448-58.
17. Crundall, D., G. Underwood, and P. Chapman. 1999. Driving experience and the functional field of view. Perception 28:1075-87.
18. Duncan, J., G. Humphreys, and R. Ward. 1997. Competitive brain activity in visual attention. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 7:255-61.
19. Dunn, A., and J. Eliot. 1999. An exploratory study of undergraduates' attributions of success or failure on spatial tests. Perception and Motor Skills 89:695-702.
20. Eals, M., and I. Silverman. 1994. The hunter-gatherer theory of spatial sex differences: Proximate factors mediating the female advantage in recall of object arrays. Ethnology and Sociobiology 15:95-105.
21. Enoch, J. 1959. Effect of the size of a complex display upon visual search. Journal of the Optical Society of America 49:280-86.
22. Fisk, A., and M. Eboch. 1989. An automatic controlled processing theory application to training component map-reading skills. Applied Ergonomics 20:2-8.
23. Galea, L., and D. Kimura. 1993. Sex differences in route-learning. Personality and Individual Differences 14:53-65.
24. Gernsbacher, M. 1993. Less skilled readers have less efficient suppression mechanisms. Psychological Science 4:294-98.
25. Govier, E., and J. Feldman. 1999. Occupational choice and patterns of cognitive abilities. British Journal of Psychology 90:99-108.
26. Halpern, D. 1992. Sex differences in cognitive abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Halpern, D., and M. Crothers 1997. The sex of cognition. In Sexual orientation: Toward biological understanding, ed. L. Ellis, 187-97. Westport, CT: Praeger.
28. Harris, L. 1981. Sex variation in spatial skill. In Spatial representations and behavior across the lifespan, ed. L. Liben, A. Patterson, and N. Newcombe, 31-54. New York: Academic Press.
29. Hodgson, M. 1998. What size window for image classification? A cognitive perspective Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 64:797-807.
30. Hollingworth, A., and J. Henderson. 1999. Object identification is isolated from scene semantic constrain: Evidence from object type and token discrimination. Acta Psychologica 102:319-43.
31. Huttenlocher, J., N. Newcombe, and M. Valsiyeva. 1999. Spatial scaling in young children. Psychological Sciences 10:393-98.
32. James, T., and D. Kimura. 1997. Sex differences in remembering the locations of objects in an array: Location-shifts versus location-exchanges. Evolution and Human Behavior 18: 155-63.
33. Johnson, W., and N. McCoy. 2000. Self-confidence, self-esteem, and assumptions of sex role in young men and women. Perceptual and Motor Skills 90:751-56.
34. Kempf, D., K. Palan, and R. Laczniak. 1997. Gender differences in information processing confidence in an advertising context: A preliminary study. Advances in Consumer Research 24:443-49.
35. Kimura, D. 1992. Sex differences in the brain. Scientific American 267:80-87.
36. Lee, A., K. Fredenburg, D. Belcher, and N. Cleveland. 1999. Gender differences in children's conceptions of competence and motivations in physical education. Sport Education and Society 4:161-74.
37. Leung, Y, K. Leung, and J. He. 1999. A generic concept-based object-oriented geographical informtion system. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 13:475-498.
38. Liben, L., and R. Downs. 1997. Can-ism and Can'tianism: A straw child. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 81:159-67.
39. Linn, M., and A. Petersen. 1985. Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development 65:1479-98.
40. Lloyd, R. 1997. Visual search processes used in map reading. Cartographica 34:11-32.
41. Lloyd, R., D. Patton, and R. Cammack. 1996. Basic-level geographic categories. The Professional Geographer 48:181-94.
42. Lloyd, R., E. Rostkowska-Covington, and T. Steinke. 1996. Feature matching and the similarity of maps. In Cartographic design: Theoretical and practical perspectives, ed. C. Wood and C. Keller, 211-36. Chichester. John Wiley and Sons.
43. Loftus, G., and N. Mackworth. 1978. Determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 4:565-72.
44. Loring-Meier, S., and D. Halpern. 1999. Sex differences in visuospatial working memory: Components of cognitive processing. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 6:464-71.
45. Maccoby, E., and C. Jacklin. 1974. The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
46. Maruff, P., J. Danckert, G. Camplin, and J. Currie. 1999. Behavioral goals constrain the selection of visual information. Psychological Science 10:522-25.
47. Masters, M., and B. Sanders. 1993. Is the gender difference in mental rotation disappearing? Behavior Genetics 23:337-41.
48. Montello, D., K. Lovelace, R. Golledge, and C. Self. 1999. Sexrelated differences and similarities in geographic and environmental spatial abilities. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 89:515-34.
49. Neave, N., M. Menaged, and D. Weightman. 1999. Sex differences in cognition: The role of testosterone and sexual orientation. Brain and Cognition 41:245-62.
50. Nigrin, A. 1993. Neural networks for pattern recognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51. Rantanen, E., and J. Goldberg. 1999. The effect of mental workload on the visual field size and shape. Ergonomics 42:816-34.
52. Rayner, K. 1978. Eye movements in reading and information processing. Psychological Bulletin 85:618-60.
53. Rosch, E. 1973. Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 4:328-50.
54. Rosch, E., and C. Mervis. 1975. Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology 7:573-605.
55. Rosch, E., C. Mervis, C. Gray, D. Johnson, and P. Boyes-Braem. 1976. Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 8:382-439.
56. Schaefer, P., and J. Thomas. 1998. Difficulty of a spatial task and sex differences in gains from practice. Perceptual and Motor Skills 87:56-58.
57. Schneider, W., and R. Shiffrin. 1977. Controlled and automatic human information processing. Part 1: Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review 84:1-66.
58. Shiffrin, R., and W. Schneider. 1977. Controlled and automatic human information processing. Part 2: Perceptual learning, automatic, attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review 84:127-90.
59. Silverman, I., and M. Eals. 1992. Sex differences in spatial abilities: Evolutionary theory and data. In The Adapted Mind, ed. J. Barkow, L. Kosmides, and J. Tooby, 553-49. New York: Oxford University Press.
60. Smith B., and D. Mark. 1999. Ontology with human subjects testing: An empirical investigation of geographic categories. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 58:245-72.
61. Stumpf, H. 1998. Gender-related differences in academically talented students' test scores and use of time on tests of spatial ability. Gifted Child Quarterly 42:157-71.
62. Tversky, B., and K. Hemenway. 1983. Categories of environmental scenes. Cognitive Psychology 15:121-49.
63. Usery, E. 1993. Category theory and the structure of features in geographic information systems. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems 20:5-12.
64. Voyer, D., S. Voyer, and M. Bryden. 1995. Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin 117:250-70.
65. Walter, K., A. Roberts, and S. Brownlow. 2000. Spatial perception and mental rotation produce gender differences in hemovelocity: A TCD study. Journal of Psychophysiology 14:37-45.
66. Walton, G., E. Armstrong, and T. Bower. 1997. Faces as forms in the world of the newborn. Infant Behavior and Development 20:537-43.
67. Webster, R., and T. Ellis. 1996. Men's and women's self-confidence in performing financial analysis. Psychological Reports 79:1251-54.
68. Wood, C. 1993. Visual search centrality and minimum map size. Cartographica 30:32-44.