Median method for eliminating infrequent artifacts and identifying the signals blurred by latency jitter and uncertain occurrence

Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 68-77

  Yabe, Hirooki ^a  

^a HIROSAKI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0008747844     PISSN: 07433808     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03209417     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. BORDA, R. P., & FROST, J. D. (1968). Error reduction in small sample averaging through the use of the median rather than the mean. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 25, 391-392.
2. DAWSON, G. D. (1954). A summation technique for the detection of small evoked potentials. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 6, 65-84.
3. KERKHOF, G. A., & UHLENBROEK, J. (1981). P3 latency in threshold signal detection. Biological Psychology, 13, 89-105.
4. MICHALEWSKI, H. J., PRASHER, D. K., & STARR, A. (1986). Latency variability and temporal interrelationships of the auditory event-related potentials (N1, P2, N2, and P3) in normal subjects. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 65, 59-71.
5. PERRY, N. W. (1966). Signal versus noise in the evoked potential. Science, 153, 1022.
6. PFEFFERBAUM, A., FORD, J. M., WENEGRAT, B. G., ROTH, W. T., & KOPELL, B. S. (1984a). Clinical application of the P3 component of event-related potentials: I. Normal aging. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 59, 85-103.
7. PFEFFERBAUM, A., FORD, J. M., WENEGRAT, B. G., ROTH, W. T., & KOPELL, B. S. (1984b). Clinical application of the P3 component of event-related potentials: II. Dementia, depression and schizophrenia. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 59, 104-124.
8. PICTON, T. W., & HILLYARD, S. A. (1988). Endogenous event-related potentials. In T. W. Picton (Ed.), EEG Handbook (Vol. 3, pp. 381-384). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
9. PICTON, T. W., HILLYARD, S. A., & GALAMBOS, R. (1976). Habitation and attention in the auditory system. In W. D. Keidel and W. D. Neff (Eds.), Handbook of sensory physiology: Vol. 5. Auditory system. Clinical and special topics (pp. 343-389). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
10. PUCE, A., BERLOVIC, S. F., CADUSCH, P. J., & BLADIN P. F. (1994). P3 latency jitter assessed using 2 techniques. I. Simulated data and surface recordings in normal subjects. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 92, 352-364.
11. RUCHKIN, D. S. (1988). Measurement of event-related potentials: Signal extraction. In T. W. Picton (Ed.), Handbook of electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology: Vol. 3. Human eventrelated potentials (pp. 7-43). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
12. SQUIRES, K. C., HILLYARD, S. A., & LINDSAY, P. H. (1973). Vertex potentials evoked during auditory signal detection: Relation to decision criteria. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 265-272.
13. SUTTON, S., BRAREN, M., ZUBIN, J., & JOHN, E. R. (1965). Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science, 150, 1187-1188.
14. WALTER, W. G., COOPER, R., ALDRIDGE, V. J., MCCALLUM, W. C., & WINTER, A. L. (1964). Contingent negative variation: An electric sign of sensorimotor association and expectancy in the human brain. Nature, 203, 380-384.
15. WOODY, C. D. (1967). Characterization of an adaptive filter for the analysis of variable latency neuroelectric signals. Medical & Biological Engineering, 5, 539-553.
16. YABE, H., SAITO, F., & FUKUSHIMA, Y. (1993). Median method for detecting endogenous event-related brain potentials. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 89, 403-407.
17. YABE, H., SATO, Y., SUTOH, T., SHINOZAKI, N., HIRUMA, T., NASHIDA T., & KANEKO, S. (1998). The effect of median method on the trial-to-trial latency jitter of ERP signals. Manuscript in preparation.