Design of Experiments with Two- and Four-Level Factors

Journal of Quality Technology

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 363-375

  Ankenman, Bruce E ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Foldover; Fractional Factorial Designs; Minimum Aberration; Orthogonal Arrays; Resolution

Indexed keywords

EID: 0008637347     PISSN: 00224065     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00224065.1999.11979943     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. ADDELMAN, S. (1972). "Recent Developments in the Design of Factorial Experiments". Journal of the American Statistical Association 67, pp. 103-111.
2. k-p Designs". Technometrics 36, pp. 308-311
3. BISGAARD, S. (1997a). "Why Three-Level Designs Are Not So Useful for Technological Experiments". Quality Engineering 9, pp. 545-550.
4. BISGAARD, S. (1997b). "Accommodating Four-Level Factors in Two-Level Factorial Designs". Quality Engineering 10, pp. 205-206.
5. BOX, G. E. P.; HUNTER, W. G.; and HUNTER, J. S. (1978). Statistics for Experimenters. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
6. k-p Designs". Technometrics 22, pp. 601-608.
7. MONTGOMERY, D. C. (1997). Design and Analysis of Experiments, 4th ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
8. k-p Resolution IV Designs". Journal of Quality Technology 28, pp. 446-450.
9. TAGUCHI, G. (1987). System Of Experimental Design, Vol. 1. Unipub/Kraus International Publications, White Plains, NY.
10. WU, C. F. J. and ZHANG, R. (1993). "Minimum Aberration Designs with Two-Level and Four-Level Factors". Biometrika 80, pp. 203-209.