Estimating net benefits of reallocation: Discrete choice models of sport and commercial fishing

Marine Resource Economics

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 307-327

  Berman, Matthew ^a   Haley, Sharman ^a   Kim, Hongjin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA ANCHORAGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Allocation; Commercial fishing; Crew; Discrete choice; Net benefits; Nonmarket value; Recreational fishery valuation; Salmon; Sport fishing; Travel cost model

Indexed keywords

ONCORHYNCHUS NERKA;

EID: 0008623294     PISSN: 07381360     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/mre.12.4.42629206     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Anderson, L.G. 1980. Necessary Components of Economic Surplus in Fisheries Economics. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 37:858-70.
2. Beggs, S., S. Cardell, and J. Hausman. 1981. Assessing the Potential Demand for Electric Cars. Journal of Econometrics 17(1)1-19.
3. Ben-Akiva, M., and S.R. Lerman. 1985. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
4. Bockstael, N.E., K.E. McConnell, and I.E. Strand. 1989. A Random Utility Model for Sportfishing: Some Preliminary Results for Florida. Marine Resource Economics 6(2):245-60.
5. Bockstael, N.E., and J.J. Opaluch. 1983. Discrete Modelling of Supply Response Under Uncertainty: The Case of the Fishery. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 10:125-37.
6. Domencich, T.A., and D. McFadden. 1975. Urban Travel Demand: A Behavioral Analysis. Amsterdam: North Holland.
7. Dupont, D.P. 1993. Price Uncertainty, Expectations Formation and Fishers' Location Choices. Marine Resource Economics 8(2):219-47.
8. Edwards, S.F. 1990. An Economics Guide to Allocation of Fish Stocks Between Commercial and Recreational Fisheries. NOAA Technical Report NMFS 94. U.S. Department of Commerce.
9. Gatewood, J.B., and B.J. McCay. 1990. Comparison of Job Satisfaction in Six New Jersey Fisheries: Implications for Management. Human Organization 49(1):14-25.
10. Gislason, G., E. Lam, J. Paul, and E. Battle. 1996. The Economic Value of Salmon: Chinook and Coho in British Columbia. Prepared for Canada Department of Fisheries and Oceans. Vancouver BC: The ARA Consulting Group Inc.
11. Hanneman, W.M. 1985. Applied Welfare Analysis with Discrete Choice Models. Working Paper. University of California, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics. Berkeley, CA.
12. ISER. 1996. Effects of Management Changes for Kenai River Late-Run Sockeye. Anchorage AK: Institute of Social and Economic Research.
13. Jones and Stokes. 1987. Southcentral Alaska Sport Fish Economic Study. Alaska Department of Fish and Game.
14. -1991. Southeast Alaska Sport Fishing Economic Study. Alaska Department of Fish and Game.
15. McConnell, K.E. 1992. On-site Time in the Demand for Recreation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74(November):918-25.
16. -1995. Consumer Surplus from Discrete Choice Models. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29(November):263-70.
17. McFadden, D. 1981. Econometric Models of Probabilistic Choice. Structural Analysis of Discrete Data: With Econometric Applications, C. Manski and D. McFadden, eds. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
18. Mills, M.J. 1993. Harvest, Catch, and Participation in Alaska Sport Fisheries During 1992. Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Sport Fish.
19. Pollnac, R.B., and J.J. Poggie Jr. 1988. The Structure of Job Satisfaction Among New England Fishermen and Its Application to Fisheries Management Policy. American Anthropologist 90:888-901.
20. Small, K.A., and H.S. Rosen. 1981. Applied Welfare Economics with Discrete Choice Models. Econometrica 49:105-30.
21. Smith, C.L. 1981. Satisfaction Bonus from Salmon Fishing: Implications for Economic Evaluation. Land Economics 57(2):181-96.