A survey of english NHS prescribing advisers'roles, and their views on improving prescribing in the new NHS

Pharmaceutical Journal

Volumn 264, Issue 7091, 2000, Pages 557-559

  Baines, D L ^a   Rafferty, J P ^a   McLeod, H S T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0008621140     PISSN: 00316873     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Department of Health. Working for patients. London: HM Stationery Office, 1989.
2. Department of Health. Improving prescribing. London: HM Stationery Office, 1991.
3. Sleator DJD. Prescribing advisers and budgets. In: Harris C (editor). Prescribing in general practice. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press, 1996.
4. Audit Commission. Prescription for improvement. London: HM Stationery Office, 1994.
5. Department of Health. Purchasing and prescribing EL(94)72. London: The Department, 1994.
6. Department of Health. Standards for local research ethics committees. London: The Department, 1994.
7. Avery AJ, Heron T. Poles apart? The views of general practitioners and family health services authority advisors on prescribing cost issues. Br J Gen Pract 1997;47:347-51.
8. Baker R, Lakhani M, Fraser R, Cheater F. A model for clinical governance in primary care groups. BMJ 1999;318:779-83.
9. Blunt J, Savulescu J, Watson AJM. Meeting the challenges facing research ethics committee: some practical suggestions. BMJ 1998; 316:58-61.
10. Department of Health. A new NHS: modern, dependable. London: Stationery Office, 1997.