Status and Trends of Silvicultural Practices in Minnesota

Northern Journal of Applied Forestry

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 203-210

  Puettmann, Klaus J ^a   Ek, Alan R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0008555841     PISSN: 07426348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/njaf/16.4.203     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. BRAND, D.G. 1991. Forest regeneration options in boreal forests. P. 245-254 in Proc. of the conf. on natural regeneration management, Simpson, C.M. (ed.). Forestry Canada, Maritimes Region.
2. CLARK, J.S. 1990. Fire and climate change during the last 750 years in northwestern Minnesota. Ecol. Monogr. 60:136-169.
3. CLEMENTS, S., AND T.NEEDHAM. 1991. Identification and economic evaluation of stand establishment strategies. P. 225-236 in Proc. of the conf. on natural regeneration management, Simpson, C.M. (ed.). Forestry Canada, Maritimes Region.
4. FAJVAN, M.A., S.T. GRUSHECKY, AND C.C. HASSLER. 1998. The effects of harvesting practices on West Virginia's wood supply. J. For. 96(5):33-39.
5. FRANKLIN, J.F., D.R. BERG, D.A. THORNBUROH, AND J.C. TAPPEINER III. 1997. Alternative silvicultural approaches to timber harvesting: Variable retention harvesting systems. P. 111-140 in Creating a forestry for the 21st century: The science of ecosystem management, Kohm, K. A., and J.F. Franklin (eds.). Island Press, Washington, DC.
6. FROTHINGHAM, E.H. 1914. White pine under forest management. USDA Bull. 13. USDA, Washington, DC.
7. HEINSELMAN, M. 1996. The Boundary Waters wilderness ecosystem. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
8. HOVE, O.P., AND C.R. BLISX. 1990. Aspen development in Beltrami County, Minnesota. P. 113-121 in Proc. of the 1989 Aspen symp, Adams, R.D. (ed.). USDA For. Serv.Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-140.
9. JAAKKO PöYRY CONSULTING, INC. 1992a. Silvicultural systems. A background paper for a Generic Environmental Impact Statement on timber harvesting and forest management in Minnesota. Prepared for the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board. Jaakko Pöyry Consulting, Inc., Tarrytown, New York, http://www.iic.state.mn.us/ download/geis/documnts.html.
10. JAAKKO PöYRY CONSULTING, INC. 1992b. Harvesting systems. A background paper for a Generic Environmental Impact Statement on timber harvesting and forest management in Minnesota. Prepared for the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board. Jaakko Pöyry Consulting, Inc., Tarrytown, New York, http://www.iic.state.mn.us/ download/geis/documnts.html.
11. JAAKKO PöYRY CONSULTING, INC. 1994. Final generic environmental impact statement study on timber harvesting and forest management in Minnesota. Prepared for the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board. Jaakko Pöyry Consulting, Inc., Tarrytown, New York, http:/ /www.iic.state.mn.us/download/geis/documnts.html.
12. LARSON, A.M. 1972. History of the white pine industry in Minnesota. Arno Press, New York.
13. LEATIIERBERRY, E.G., J.C. SPENCER, JR., T.L. SCHMIDT, AND M.R. CARROL. 1995. An analysis of Minnesota's fifth forest resources inventory. USDA For. Serv. North Central For. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull. NC-165.
14. PUETTMANN, K.J., C. BLINN, H. WnrrrxEY-McIvER, AND A. EK. 1998a. Status of Minnesota timber harvesting and silvicultural practices in 1996. A report to the Minnesota Forest Resources Council. Minnesota For. Resour. Counc. Rep. # MP0698, St. Paul, MN. 21 p. plus append.
15. PUETTMANN, K.J., M. SMIDT, AND M. DUVALL. 1998b. Soil characteristics influence the relationship between above- and below ground competition in Finns sirobns underplantings. P. 206, Symp. Abstr., Ecol. Soc. of America. 83rd Annu. Meet., Baltimore, MD.
16. ROBERTS, M.R. 1992. Stand development and overstory-understory interactions in an aspen-northern hardwoods stand. For. Ecol. Manage. 54:157-174.
17. SMIDT, M., AND K.J. PUETTMANN. 1998. Understory and canopy competition affect underplanted eastern white pine. For. Ecol. Manage. 105(1-3):137-150
18. SOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERS. 1994. Silviculture terminology with appendix of draft ecosystem management terms. Prepared by the SilvicultureWorking Group (D2). Soc. Am. For., Bethesda, MD.
19. STEARNS, F.W. 1997. History of the Lake States forests: Natural and human impacts. P. 8-29 in Lake States regional forest resources assessment: Technical papers, Vasievich, J.M., and H.H. Webster (eds.). USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-189.
20. STOECKELER, J.H., AND J.W. MACON. 1956. Regeneration of aspen cutover areas in northern Wisconsin. J. For. 56:13-16.
21. TESTER, J.R., A.M. STARFIELD, AND L.E. FRELICH. 1997. Modeling for ecosystem management in Minnesota pine forests. Biol. Cons. 80(3):313-324.
22. WAGNER, R.G., AND J.C. ZASADA. 1991. Integrating plant autecology and silvicultural activities to prevent forest vegetation management problems. For. Chron. 67:506-513.
23. WALSTAD, J.D. AND P.J. KUCH (EDS.). 1987. Forest vegetation management for conifer production. Wiley, New York.
24. WOOLSEY, T.S., JR. AND H.H. CHAPMAN. 1914. Norway pine in the Lake States. USDA Bull. 139. USDA, Washington, DC.
25. ZEHNGRAFF, P.J. 1947. Response of young aspen suckers to overhead shade. USDA For. Serv. North Central For. Exp. Sta. Tech. Note No. 278.