Character-state weighting for dna restriction site data: Asymmetry, ancestors and the asteraceae

Cladistics

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 11-19

  Mishler, Brent D ^a   Albert, Victor A ^b   Chase, Mark W ^c   Karis, Per Ola ^d   Bremer, Kare ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS   (United Kingdom)

^d SWEDISH MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASTERACEAE;

EID: 0008528393     PISSN: 07483007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/clad.1996.0002     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. ALBERT, V. A., A. BACKLUND AND K. BREMER. 1994. DNA characters and cladistics: the optimization of functional history. In: R. W. Scotland, D. J. Siebert and D. M. Williams (eds), Models in phylogenyreconstruction. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 249-272.
2. ALBERT, V. A., B. D. MISHLER AND M. W. CHASE. 1992. Character-state weighting for restriction site data in phylogenetic reconstruction, with an example from chloroplast DNA. In: P. S. Soltis, D. E. Soltis and J. J. Doyle (eds), Molecular systematics of plants. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 369-403.
3. BREMER, K. 1987. Tribal interrelationships of the Asteraceae. Cladistics 3: 210-253.
4. BREMER, K. 1994. Asteraceae: cladistics and classification. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon.
5. BREMER, K., R. K. JANSEN, P. O. KARIS, M. KALLERSJÖ, S. C. KEELEY, K.-J. KIM, H. J. MICHAELS, J. D. PALMER AND R. S. WALLACE. 1992. A review of the phylogeny and classification of the Asteraceae. Nord. J. Bot. 12: 141-148.
6. FARRIS, J. S. 1970. Methods for computing Wagner trees. Syst. Zool. 19: 83-92.
7. FARRIS, J. S. 1977. Phylogenetic analysis under Dollo's Law. Sys. Zool. 26: 77-88.
8. FUTUYMA, D. J. AND S. S. McCAFFERTY. 1990. Phylogeny and the evolution of host plant associations in the leaf beetle genus Ophradla (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Evolution 44: 1885-1913.
9. HOLSINGER, K. E. AND R. K. JANSEN. 1994. Phylogenetic analysis of restriction site data. Methods Enzymol. 224: 439-455.
10. JANSEN, R. K. AND J. D. PALMER. 1987. A chloroplast DNA inversion marks an ancient evolutionary split in the sunflower family. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 84: 5818-5822.
11. JANSEN, R. K. AND K.-J. KIM. 1993. DNA sequence variation of the ndhF gene and phylogenyof the Asteraceae. XV international Botanical Congress, Yokohama, Japan, Abstract 1.6.2-4.
12. JANSEN, R. K., K. E. HOLSINGER, H. J. MICHAELS AND J. D. PALMER. 1990. Phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast DNA restriction site data at higher taxonomic levels: an example from the Asteraceae. Evolution 44: 2089-2105.
13. JANSEN, R. K., H. J. MICHAELS AND J. D. PALMER. 1991. Phylogeny and character evolution in the Asteraceae based on chloroplast DNArestriction site mapping. Syst. Bot. 16: 98-115.
14. KARIS, P. O., M. KALLERSJÖ AND K. BREMER. 1992. Phylogenetic analysis of the Cichorioideae (Asteraceae) with emphasis on the Mutisieae. Annals of the Cichorioideae (Asteraceae) with emphasis on the Mutisieae. Ann. MO. Bot. Gard. 79: 416-427.
15. KIM, K.-J., R. K. JANSEN, R. S. WALLACE, H. J. MICHAELS AND J. D. PALMER. 1992. Phylogenetic implications of rbcL sequence variation in the Asteraceae. Ann. MO. Bot. Gard. 79: 428-445.
16. MADDISON, W. P., M. J. DONOGHUE AND D. R. MADDISON. 1984. Outgroup analysis and parsimony. Syst. Zool. 33: 83-103.
17. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1991. PAUP - Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, ver. 3.0r. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Illinois.
18. SWOFFORD, D. L. AND G. J. OLSEN. 1990. Phylogeny reconstruction. In: Molecular systematics, D. M. Hillis and C. Moritz (eds). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, pp. 411-501.