Seeing is believing and so are hearing and jumping

Journal of Logic, Language and Information

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 33-61

  Van Linder, B ^a   Van Der Hoek, W ^a   Meyer, J J ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Belief revision; Knowledge representation; Rational agents; Reasoning about action

Indexed keywords

EID: 0008525087     PISSN: 09258531     EISSN: 15729583     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1008242530244     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Alchourrón, C.E., Gärdenfors, P., and Makinson, D., 1985, On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions, Journal of Symbolic Logic 50, 510-530.
2. Arens, Y., Chee, C.Y., Hsu, C.-N., and Knoblock, C.A., 1993, Retrieving and integrating data from multiple information sources, International Journal on Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems 2(2), 127-158.
3. Barwise, J., 1989, The Situation in Logic, Volume 17 of CSLI Lecture Notes, Stanford: CSLI.
4. Castelfranchi, C., 1994, Guarantees for autonomy in cognitive agent architecture, pp. 56-70 in Intelligent Agents. Proceedings of the 1994 ECAI Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages, M. Wooldridge and N.R. Jennings, eds., Volume 890 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
5. Chellas, B.F., 1980, Modal Logic. An Introduction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Cohen, P.R. and Levesque, H.J., 1990, Intention is choice with commitment, Artificial Intelligence 42, 213-261.
7. Dunin-Keplicz, B. and Radzikowska, A., 1995, Epistemic approach to actions with typical effects, pp. 180-188 in Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty (Proceedings of ECSQARU'95), C. Froidevaux and J. Kohlas, eds., Volume 946 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (subseries LNAI), Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
8. Dunin-Keplicz, B. and Treur, J., 1994, Compositional formal specification of multi-agent systems, pp. 102-117 in Intelligent Agents. Proceedings of the 1994 ECAI Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages, M. Wooldridge and N.R. Jennings, eds., Volume 890 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
9. Elgesem, D., 1993, Action theory and modal logic, PhD thesis, Institute for Philosophy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
10. Gärdenfors, P., 1988, Knowledge in Flux: Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States, Cambridge, MA/London, England: The MIT Press.
11. Gärdenfors, P., ed., 1992, Belief Revision, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Goldblatt, R., 1992, Logics of Time and Computation, 2nd ed., Volume 7 of CSLI Lecture Notes, Stanford: CSLI.
13. Halpern, J.Y. and Moses, Y., 1992, A guide to completeness and complexity for modal logics of knowledge and belief, Artifical Intelligence 54, 319-379.
14. Harel, D., 1984, Dynamic logic, pp. 497-604 in Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Volume 2, Chapter 10, D.M. Gabbay and F. Guenthner, eds., Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
15. Hintikka, J., 1962, Knowledge and Belief, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
16. Van der Hoek, W., 1993, Systems for knowledge and beliefs, Journal of Logic and Computation 3(2), 173-195.
17. Van der Hoek, W., Van Linder, B., and Meyer, J.-J.Ch., 1994a, A logic of capabilities, pp. 366-378 in Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on the Logical Foundations of Computer Science (LFCS'94), A. Nerode and Yu.V. Matiyasevich, eds., Volume 813 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
18. Van der Hoek, W., Van Linder, B., and Meyer, J.-J.Ch., 1994b, Unravelling nondeterminism: On having the ability to choose (extended abstract), pp. 163-172 in Proceedings of the Sixth Inter-national Conference on Artificial Intelligence: Methodology, Systems, Applications (AIMSA'94), P. Jorrand and V. Sgurev, eds., Singapore: World Scientific.
19. Huang, Z., 1991, Logics for belief dependence, pp. 274-288 in Computer Science Logic, 4th Work-shop CSL'90, E. Börger, H. Kleine Büning, M.M. Richter, and W. Schönfeld, eds., Volume 533 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
20. Huang, Z., 1994, Logics for agents with bounded rationality, PhD thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam.
21. Huang, Z., Masuch, M., and Polos, E., ALX, an action logic for agents with bounded rationality, Technical Report 92-70, Center for Computer Science in Organization and Management, University of Amsterdam, October 1992. To appear in Artificial Intelligence.
22. Kenny, A., 1975, Will, Freedom and Power, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
23. Kraus, S. and Lehmann, D., 1988, Knowledge, belief and time, Theoretical Computer Science 58, 155-174.
24. Lesperance, Y, Levesque, H., Lin, F., Marcu, D., Reiter, R., and Scherl, R., Foundations of a logical approach to agent-programming, 1996, pp. 331-347 in Intelligent Agents Volume II - Agent Theories, Architectures and Languages, M. Wooldridge, J.P. Müller and M. Tambe, eds., Volume 1037 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (subseries LNAI), Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
25. Levesque, H., 1994, Knowledge, action and ability in the situation calculus, Overheads from invited talk at TARK 1994.
26. Levy, A.Y, Sagiv, Y, and Srivastava, D., 1994, Towards efficient information gathering agents, pp. 64-70 in Working Notes of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Software Agents, Stanford, California.
27. Van Linder, B., Van der Hoek, W., and Meyer, J.-J.Ch., 1994a, Communicating rational agents, pp. 202-213 in KI-94: Advances in Artificial Intelligence, B. Nebel and L. Dreschler-Fischer, eds., Volume 861 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (subseries LNAI), Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
28. Van Linder, B., Van der Hoek, W., and Meyer, J.-J.Ch., 1994b, Tests as epistemic updates, pp. 331-335 in Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI'94), A.G. Cohn, ed., Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
29. Van Linder, B., Van der Hoek, W., and Meyer, J.-J.Ch., 1995a, Actions that make you change your mind, pp. 103-146 in Knowledge and Belief in Philosophy and Artificial Intelligence, A. Laux and H. Wansing, ed., Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
30. Van Linder, B., Van der Hoek, W., and Meyer, J.-J.Ch., 1995b, The dynamics of default reasoning (extended abstract), pp. 277-284 in Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty (Proceedings of ECSQARU'95), C. Froidevaux and J. Kohlas, eds., Volume 946 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (subseries LNAI), Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
31. Van Linder, B., Van der Hoek, W., and Meyer, J.-J.Ch., 1996, Formalising motivational attitudes of agents: On preferences, goals and commitments, pp. 17-32 in Intelligent Agents Volume II -Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages, M. Wooldridge, J.P. Müller, and M. Tambe, eds., Volume 1037 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (subseries LNAI), Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
32. Meyer, J.-J.Ch. and Van der Hoek, W., 1992, A modal logic for nonmonotonic reasoning, pp. 37-77 in Non-Monotonic Reasoning and Partial Semantics, W. Van der Hoek, J.-J.Ch. Meyer, Y.H. Tan, and C. Witteveen, eds., Chichester: Ellis Horwood.
33. Meyer, J.-J.Ch. and Van der Hoek, W., 1995, Epistemic Logic for AI and Computer Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Moore, R.C., 1980, Reasoning about knowledge and action, Technical Report 191, SRI International.
35. Moore, R.C., 1984, A formal theory of knowledge and action, Technical Report 320, SRI International.
36. Rao, A.S. and Georgeff, M.P., 1991a, Asymmetry thesis and side-effect problems in linear time and branching time intention logics, pp. 498-504 in Proceedings of the Twelfth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI91).
37. Rao, A.S. and Georgeff, M.P., 1991b, Modeling rational agents within a BDI-architecture, pp. 473-484 in Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, J. Allen, R. Fikes, and E. Sandewall, eds., San Mateo CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
38. Rao, A.S. and Georgeff, M.P., 1993, A model-theoretic approach to the verification of situated reasoning systems, pp. 318-324 in Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'93).
39. Shoham, Y., 1993, Agent-oriented programming, Artificial Intelligence 60, 51-92.
40. Shoham, Y. and Cousins, S.B., 1994, Logics of mental attitudes in AI, pp. 296-309 in Foundations of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, G. Lakemeyer and B. Nebel, eds., Volume 810 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (subseries LNAI), Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
41. Thomas, S.R., 1993, PLACA, an agent oriented programming language, PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford CA. Appeared as Technical Report STANCS-93-1487.
42. Wooldridge, M., 1994, The logical modelling of computational multi-agent systems, PhD thesis, Department of Computation, UMIST, Manchester. Appeared as Technical Report MMU-DOC94-01.
43. Wooldridge, M. and Fisher, M., 1992, A first-order branching time logic of multi-agent systems, pp. 234-238 in Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI'92), B. Neumann, ed., Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
44. Von Wright, G.H., 1963, Norm and Action, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.