-
3
-
-
0000510199
-
-
M. N. Rosenbluth, R. Z. Sagdeev, J. B. Tylor, and G. M. Zaslavsky, Nucl. Fusion 6, 297 (1966).
-
(1966)
Nucl. Fusion
, vol.6
, pp. 297
-
-
Rosenbluth, M.N.1
Sagdeev, R.Z.2
Tylor, J.B.3
Zaslavsky, G.M.4
-
8
-
-
0000655156
-
-
Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research, Innsbruck, 1978 Internatinoal Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna
-
B. B. Kadomtsev and O. P. Pogutse, in Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference, Innsbruck, 1978 (Internatinoal Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1979), Vol. 1, p. 649.
-
(1979)
Proceedings of the 7th International Conference
, vol.1
, pp. 649
-
-
Kadomtsev, B.B.1
Pogutse, O.P.2
-
19
-
-
0001532567
-
-
J. R. Myra, P. J. Catto, H. E. Mynick, and R. E. Duvall, Phys. Fluids B 5, 1160 (1993).
-
(1993)
Phys. Fluids B
, vol.5
, pp. 1160
-
-
Myra, J.R.1
Catto, P.J.2
Mynick, H.E.3
Duvall, R.E.4
-
25
-
-
25044459764
-
-
H.-D. Wang, M. Vlad, E. Vanden Eijnden, F. Spineanu, J. H. Misguich, and R. Balescu, Phys. Rev. E 51, 4844 (1995).
-
(1995)
Phys. Rev. E
, vol.51
, pp. 4844
-
-
Wang, H.-D.1
Vlad, M.2
Vanden Eijnden, E.3
Spineanu, F.4
Misguich, J.H.5
Balescu, R.6
-
31
-
-
85033860988
-
-
note
-
It should be noted that the hybrid kinetic equation (3) can be coupled with the Maxwell equations, and, hence, allows a self-consistent treatment of the magnetic field. In contrast, the Langevin equations (2) are necessarily non-self-consistent. The self-consistency problem will not be considered here and the magnetic field properties will be specified a priori.
-
-
-
-
39
-
-
0001466688
-
-
edited by M. N. Rosenbluth and R. Z. Sagdeev North-Holland, Amsterdam
-
J. A. Krommes, Handbook of Plasma Physics, edited by M. N. Rosenbluth and R. Z. Sagdeev (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1984), Vol. 2, p. 183.
-
(1984)
Handbook of Plasma Physics
, vol.2
, pp. 183
-
-
Krommes, J.A.1
-
45
-
-
85033854273
-
-
note
-
Two comments about this result: The distribution function F depends on z, contrary to the density profile n(x;t) introduced in Ref. 33. The density profile n(x;t) of Ref. 33, defined with a different choice of normalization, must thus be identified with our reduced distribution function (32).
-
-
-
|