Has Gifford Pinchot's Regulatory Vision Been Realized?

Journal of Forestry

Volumn 98, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 15-22

  Ellefson, Paul V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0008353077     PISSN: 00221201     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. AGEE, J.L. 1975. Suggested state forest practices act: One implementing mechanism for improving water quality on forest lands. Journal of Forestry 73(1):40-41.
2. AMERICAN FOREST & PAPER ASSOCIATION (AF&PA). 1994. Federal laws and regulations affecting private forestry. Washington, DC.
3. ANDREWS, R.N.L. 2000. Risk-based decisionmaking. In Environmental policy: New directions for the twenty-first century, eds. N.J. Vig and M.E. Kraft, 210-31. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
4. BARDACH, E., and R.A. KAGAN. 1982. Going by the book The problem of regulatory unreasonableness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
5. CLEPPER, H. 1971. Professional forestry in the United States. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
6. DANA, S.T., and S.K. FAIRFAX. 1980. Forest and range policy: Its development in the United States. New York: McGraw-Hill.
7. DAVIES, J.C., and J. MAZUREK. 1997. Regulating pollution: Does the US system work? Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
8. ELLEFSON, P.V., and A.S. CHENG. 1994. State forest practice programs: Regulation of private forestry comes of age. Journal of Forestry 92(5):34-37.
9. ELLEFSON, P.V., A.S. CHENG, and R.J. MOULTON. 1995. Regulation of private forestry practices by state governments. Bulletin 605-1995. St. Paul: Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station.
10. HAWKS, L.W., F.W. CUBBAGE, and others. 1993. Forest water quality protection: A comparison of regulatory and voluntary programs. Journal of Forestry 91(5): 48-54.
11. HAYNES, R.W., D.M. ADAMS, and J.R. MILLS. 1995. The 1993 RPA timber assessment update. General Technical Report RM-GTR-259. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
12. HENLY, R.K. 1992. Estimating impacts of forest practices regulation: Analysis and case study results. Sacramento: California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection.
13. HOERGER, F.D. 1993. Desirable attributes of environmental regulations. Discussion paper CRM 93-01. Center for Risk Management. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
14. KERWIN, C.M. 1999. Rulemaking: How government agencies write law and make policy. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
15. LUBBERS, J.S. 1994. Better regulations: The National Performance Review's regulatory reform recommendations. Duke Law Review 43(6):1165-79.
16. NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL. 1998. Forested landscapes in perspective: Prospects and opportunities for sustainable management of America's nonfederal forests. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
17. OSBORNE, D., and T. GAEBLER. 1992. Reinventing government. New York: Addison-Wesley.
18. PINCHOT, G. 1947. Breaking new ground. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
19. SITKIN, S.M., and R.J. BIES. 1993. The legalistic organization: Definitions, dimensions, and dilemmas. Organizational Science 4(3):345-51.
20. SOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERS (SAF) COMMITTEE FOR THE APPLICATION OF FORESTRY. 1919. Forest devastation: A national danger and a plan to meet it. Journal of Forestry 17(8):899.
21. VAUX, H.J. 1983. State interventions on private forests in California. In Government interventions, social needs, and management of US forests, ed. R.A. Sedjo, 124-68. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.