Older Adults: Hearing Handicap and Hearing Aid Management

American Journal of Audiology

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 25-33

  Garstecki, Dean C ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Hearing aids; Hearing handicap; Older adults

Indexed keywords

EID: 0008289833     PISSN: 10590889     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1059-0889.0503.25     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. American National Standards Institute. (1978). Methods for manual pure-tone threshold audiometry (ANSI S3.21 [R-1986]). New York.
2. Cox, R. M., & Gilmore, C. (1990). Development of the Profile of Hearing Aid Performance (PHAP). Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33, 343-357.
3. Demorest, M. E., & Erdman, S. A. (1986). Scale composition and item analysis of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 29, 515-535.
4. Garstecki, D. C., & Erler, S. F. (1995). Older women and hearing. American Journal of Audiology, 4(2), 41-46.
5. Garstecki, D. C., & Erler, S. F. (1996). Older adult performance on the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 28-42.
6. Goldstein, D. P. (1984, September). Hearing impairment, hearing aids, and audiology. Asha, 26, 24-35, 38.
7. Kochkin, S. (1992). MarkeTrak III: Higher hearing aid sales don't signal better market penetration. The Hearing Journal, 45(7), 1-7.
8. Kochkin, S. (1993). MarkeTrak III: Why 20 million in US don't use hearing aids for their hearing loss. The Hearing Journal, 46, 1-2, 1-8.
9. Tillman, T., & Carhart, R. (1966). Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6. Brooks Air Force Base, TX: USAF School of Aerospace Medicine Technical Report.
10. Shipley, W. C. (1967). Shipley Institute of Living Scale. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Association.