Managing wildlife by ballot initiative: The Arizona experience

Human Dimensions of Wildlife

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 60-66

  DeVos, James C ^a   Shroufe, Duane L ^a   Supplee, Vashti C ^a  

^a ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT   (United States)

Author keywords

Arizona; Ballot initiative; Responsive management; Trapping

Indexed keywords

EID: 0008125217     PISSN: 10871209     EISSN: 1533158X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10871209809359126     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Behavior Research Center (1993). Arizona wildlife management survey. Unpublished contract report to Arizona Game and Fish Department. Phoenix, AZ.
2. Decker, D. J., & Krueger, C. C. (1993). Communication: Catalyst for effective fishery management. In C. C. Kohler & W. A. Hubert (Eds.), Inland fisheries management in North America. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society.
3. Decker, D. J., Krueger, C. C., Baer, R. A., Jr., Knuth, B. A., & Richmond, M. E. (1996). From clients to stakeholders: A philosophical shift for fish and wildlife management. Human Dimension of Wildlife, 1(1), 70-82.
4. Gill, R. B. (1996). The wildlife professional subculture: The case of the crazy aunt. Human Dimension of Wildlife, 7(1), 60-69.
5. Langenau, E. E., Jr. (1987). Anticipating wildlife values tomorrow. In D. J. Decker and G. R. Goff (Eds.), Valuing wildlife: Economic and social perspectives. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
6. McFarlane, B. A. (1996). Socialization influences of specialization among birdwatchers. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 1(1), 35-50.
7. Stout, R. J., Decker, D. J., & Knuth, B. A. (1992). Evaluating citizen participation: Creating a communications partnership that works. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, 57,135-140.