Information inequality: UCITA, public policy and information access

Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting

Volumn 37, Issue , 2000, Pages 159-165

  Meyer, Eric T ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0007945329     PISSN: 00447870     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Agre, P. (1997). The Internet and publicdiscourse. First Monday 3(3).
2. ALA. (1999). ALA Activity on the proposed UCITA [On -line]. Retrieved November 25, 1999 from http://www.ala.org/washoff/activity.html.
3. Albanese, A., Rogers. M., & Older, N. (1999). UCITA passes: ALA vows to fight. Library Journal 124 (14): 121-122.
4. Bernstein, J. et. al. (1999). Letter from U.S. Federal Trade Commission to NCCUSL [On-line]. Retrieved December 1, 1999 from http://www.ftc.gov/be/v990010.htm.
5. Brennan, L., & Barber, G. (1999). Why software professionals should support the Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act (and what will happen if they don't). Submitted to Software Quality Professional.
6. Communications Decency Act of 1996,47 U.S.C. 223 (Supp. 1997).
7. Crews, K. (1999). Learning Cyberlaw in Cyberspace [On-line]. Retrieved October I, 1999 from http://www.cyberspacelaw.org/crews/index.html.
8. Crews, K. (1992). Copyright Law, Libraries, and Universities. Presented to the Association of Research Libraries, October 1992.
9. Digital Millennium Copyright Act, Pub. L. No. 105-304, 112 Stat. 2860 1201 (1998).
10. Ebbinghouse, C. (1998). UCC2B: The impact on information professionals. Searcher 6 (8): 24-31.
11. Foresight Resources Corp. v. Portmiller. 719 F. Supp. 1006, 1010 (D. Kan. 1989)
12. Founds, G. (1999). Note: Shrinkwrap licenses and clickwrap agreements: 2B or not 2B? Federal Communications Law Journal 52: 99-123.
13. Gomulkiewicz, R. (1999). How copyleft uses license rights to succeed in the open source software revolution and the implications for article 2B. Houston Law Review 36: 179-193.
14. Kaner, C. (1999a). Nondisclosure and UCITA. Presented to NCCUSL Annual Meeting.
15. Kaner, C. (1999b). Response to: Why software professionals should support the Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act (and what will happen if they don't). Forthcoming in Software Quality Professional
16. Katzman, N. (1974). The impact of communication technology. Journal of Communication 24:47-58.
17. Kingdon, J. (1995). Agendas,alternatives and public policies. New York: HarperCollins.
18. Kunze, C. (1997). The 2BGuide [On-line]. Retrieved December 1, 1999 from http://www.2BGuide.com.
19. Lessig, L. (1998). Sign it and weep [On -line]. Retrieved October 10, 1999 from http://www.thestandard.com/articles/display/0,1449,2583,00.html?01.
20. Meyer, E. & Kling, R. (2000). Participation in elite scientific communities: Does access to electronic working paper repositories alter inequalities? American Sociological Association Annual Meeting (August), Washington, D.C.
21. National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws [NCCUSL]. (1999a). ALI and NCCUSL announce new drafting committee for UCC articles 2 and 2A [On-line]. Retrieved December 1,1999 from http://www.nccusl.org/pressrel/ucc2a2.htm.
22. NCCUSL. (1999b). Series of Papers on UCITA Issues [On-line]. Retrieved October 1, 1999 from http://www.nccusl.org/pressrel/UCITAQA.HTM.
23. NCCUSL. ( 1999c). Web site home page [On -line]. Retrieved December 4, 1999 from http://www.nccusl.org.
24. Oakley, R.L. (1998). UCC Article 2B: Some Preliminary Comments on a New Issue for the Library Community. AALL Spectrum 2 (5): 14-16.
25. ProCD, Inc. v. Matthew Zeidenberg and Silken Mountain Web Services, Inc., 86 F.3d 1447 (7th Cir. 1996).
26. Reichman, J., & Franklin, J. (1998). Privately legislated intellectual property rights: The limits of article 2B and UCC. Presented at Intellectual property & contract law in the information age: The impact of article 2B of the U.C.C. on the future of transactions in information & electronic commerce, Berkeley, CA.
27. Ring, C., & Nimmer, R. (1999). Series of papers on UCITA issues [On-line]. Retrieved November 11, 1999 from http://www.nccusl.org/pressrel/UCITAQA.HTM.
28. Samuelson, P. (1998). Legally Speaking: Does Information Really Want to be Licensed? Communications of the ACM.
29. Schement, J. & Curtis, T. (1995). Tendencies and tensions of the information age: The production and distribution of information in the United States. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
30. Simons, B. (1999). ACM letter on UCITA [On-line]. Retrieved December 10,1999 from http://www.acm.org/usacm/copyright/usacm-ucita.html.
31. Step-Saver Data Sys., Inc. v. Wyse Tech., 939 F.2d 91. 99 (3d Cir. 1991).
32. Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA) [On -line]. July 1999 draft from http://www.law.upenn.edu/bll/ulc/uecicta/uetast84.htm.
33. Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act (UCITA) [On-line]. October 15,1999 draft from http://www.Iaw.upenn.edu/bll/ulc/ucita/cita10st.htm.
34. Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act (UCITA), Comments [On-line]. October 15,1999 draft from http://www.law.upenn.edu/bll/ulc/ucita/cita10cm.htm.
35. U.S. Dept. of Commerce. (1998). Falling through the net II: New data on the digital divide. Washington, D.C.: National Telecommunications & Information Administration.
36. Vault Corp. v. Quaid Software Ltd., 655 F.Supp. 750, 762-63 (E.D. La. 1987).
37. Webster, D., Bender, D., Henderson, C., & Oakley, R. (1998). Library letter regarding article 2B [On-line]. October 8,1998 version from http://www.arl.org/info/letters/libltr.htm.
38. Webster, D. (1999). Letter to the NCCUSL on behalf of the ALA [On -line]. Retrieved on December 1, 1999 from http://www.ala.org/washoff/071299.html.
39. Wresch, W. (1996). Disconnected: Haves and Have-Nois in the Information Age. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
40. Zakon, R. ( 1999). Hobbes' internet timeline v4.2 [On -line]. Retrieved December 9, 1999 from http://info.isoc.org/guest/zakon/Internet/History/HIT.html.