Tax policy with quasi-geometric discounting

International Economic Journal

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 1-40

  Krusell, Per ^a   Kuruşçu, Burhanettin ^a   Smith, Anthony A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0007793347     PISSN: 10168737     EISSN: 1743517X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10168730000000025     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Barro, Robert. 1999. Ramsey Meets Laibson in the Neoclassical Growth Model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114 (4): 1125–1152.
2. Bernheim, Douglas B., Ray, Debraj, and Yeltekin, Sevin. 1999. Self-Control, Saving, And the Low Asset Trap, mimeo.
3. Krusell, per, and Jose-Victor, Rios-Rull. “ On the Size of U.S. Government: Political Economy in the Neoclossical Growth Model ”. In American Economic Review 1156–1181. Forthcoming
4. Krusell, Per, Kuruscu, Burhanettin, and Smith, Anthony A., :Jr. 1999. Equilibrium Welfare and Government policy with Quasi-Geometric Discounting, Mimeo.
5. Krusell, Pre, and Smith, Jr., 1999. Consumption-Savings Decisions with Quasi-Geometric Discounting, Mimeo.
6. Laibson, David. 1994. Self-Control and saving, Mimeo: MIT.
7. Laibson, David. 1996. Hyperbolic Discount Functions, Undersaving, and saving policy, NBER Working paper, No. 5635
8. Ted, O'Donoghue, and Rabin, Matthew. 1999. Doing It Now or Later. American Economic Review, 89 (1): 103–124.
9. Phelps, Edmund S., and Pollak, R.A., 1968. On Second-best National Saving and Game-Equilibrium Growth. Review of Economic Studies, 35 (1): 185–199.
10. Strotz, Robert H., 1956. Myopia and Inconsistency in Dynamic Utility Maximization. Review of Economic studies, 23 (1): 65–180.