The connected central relationship patterns (CCRP): A structural version of the CCRT

Psychotherapy Research

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 408-425

  Dahlbender, Reiner W ^a   Albani, Cornelia ^a   Pokorny, Dan ^a   Kächele, Horst ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0007790758     PISSN: 10503307     EISSN: 14684381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10503309812331332497     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Albani, C. (1992). Vom ZBKT zum ZBM: Eine methodenkritische Einzelfallstudie zur Erfassung von repetitiven Mustern und Übertragung mit der ZBKT-Methode. Med. Dissertation, University Leipzig.
2. Barber, J. P., Crits-Christoph, P., and Luborsky, L. (1990). A guide to the CCRT standard categories and their classification. In L. Luborsky and P. Crits-Christoph (Eds.), Understanding transference: The CCRT method. New York: Basic Books.
3. Barber, J. P., and Crits-Christoph, P. (1993). Advances in measures of psychodynamic formu-lations. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 574-585.
4. Barber, J. P., Luborsky, L., Crits-Christoph, P., and Diguer, L. (1995). A comparison of core conflictual relationship themes before psychotherapy and during early sessions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 145-148.
5. Benjamin, L. S. (1974). Structural analysis of social behavior. Psychological Review, 81, 392-425.
6. Benjamin, L. S. (1986). Operational definition and measurement of dynamics shown in the stream of free associations. Psychiatry, 49, 104-129.
7. Bishop, Y., Fienberg, S., and Holland, P. (1984). Discrete multivariate analysis: Theory and practice. Cambridge/London: The MIT Press.
8. Bond, J. A., Hansell, J., and Shevrin, H. (1987). Locating transference paradigms in psychotherapy tran-scripts: Reliability of relationship episode location in the core conflictual relationship theme (CCRT) method. Psychotherapy, 24, 736-749.
9. Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press.
10. Crits-Christoph, P., and Demorest, A. (1988). List of standard categories (Edition 2). unpublished manusricpt, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine.
11. Crits-Christoph, P., and Demorest, A. (1991). Qualitative assessment of relationship theme components. In M. J. Horowitz (Ed.), Person schemas and maladaptive interpersonal behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Crits-Christoph, P., Cooper, A., and Luborsky, L. (1988). The accuracy of therapists’ interpretations and the outcome of dynamic psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 490-495.
13. Crits-Christoph, P., Luborsky, L., Dahl, L., Popp, C., Mellon, J., and Mark, D. (1988): Clinicians can agree in assessing relationship patterns in psy-chotherapy. The core conflictual relationship theme method. Archives of General Psychiatry 45: 1001-1004.
14. Crits-Christoph, P., and Baranackie, K. (1992). The quantitative assessment of relationship themes method: A merger of SASB and the CCRT. Paper presented at Annual Meeting, Society of Psy-chotherapy Research, 23-27 June 1992, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
15. Crits-Christoph, P., Barber, J. P., and Kurcias, J. S. (1993). The accuracy of therapists’ interpretations and the development of the therapeutic alliance. Psychotherapy Research, 3, 25-35.
16. Crits-Christoph, P., Baranackie, K., Dahlbender, R. W., and Zobel, H. Y. (1995). Quantitative Einschätzung Interpersoneller Themen. Deutsche Manual Bearbeitung. Ulm: Ulmer Textbank.
17. Dahlbender, R. W., Volkert, M., Torres, L., Pokomy, D., Frevert, G., Reichert, S., and Kachele, H. (1992). Intra-and intersubjectivity in Relationship Anecdotes Paradigm (RAP) interviews of young women. Paper presented at Annual Meeting, Society for Psychotherapy Research, 23-27 June 1992, Berkeley, CA.
18. Dahlbender, R. W., Torres, L., Reichert, S., Stiibner, S., Frevert, G., and Kachele, H. (1993). Die Praxis des Beziehungsepisoden-Interviews. Zeitschrift für Psychosomatik und Psychoanalyse, 39, 51-62.
19. Dahlbender, R. W., Albani, C., Pokorny, D., and Frevert, G. (1994). Forschungsorientierte Dokumentation von Beziehungsepisoden nach der ZBKT/ZBM-Methode. Ulmer Arbeitsmaterialien 2: Department Psychotherapy, University Ulm.
20. Dahlbender, R. W., Kachele, H., Frevert, G., and Schnekenburger, S. (1995). Formalisierte Fokus-formulierung in der Psychotherapie. Fundamenta Psychiatrica, 9, 191-201.
21. Eckert, R., Luborsky, L, Barber, J., and Crits-Christoph, P. (1990). The narratives and CCRTs of patients with major depression. In L. Luborsky and P. Crits-Christoph (Eds.), Understanding transference. New York: Basic Books.
22. Finneburg, M., and Klein, B. (1993). Probeme bei der Anwendung des ZBKT-Verfahrens im Grup-pensetting. Gruppenpsychotherapie und Gruppendynamik, 29, 147-169.
23. Flader, D., and Giesecke, M. (1980). Erzählen im psychoanalytischen Erstinterview. In K. Ehlich (Ed.), Erzählen im Alltag. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
24. Freud, S. (1912). Zur Dynamik der Übertragung. Gesammelt Werke Bd 8, 363-374.
25. Frevert, G., Cierpka, M., Dahlbender, R. W., Albani, C., and Plöttner, G. (1992). Die Familien Bezie-hungskonflikt Themen. Familiendynamik, 3, 273-289.
26. Grawe, K. (1988). Zurück zur psychotherapeutischen Einzeifallforschung. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, 17, 4-5.
27. Horowitz, M. J. (1989). Relationship schema formulation: Role-Relationship Models and intrapsychic conflict. Psychiatry, 52, 260-274.
28. Horowitz, M. J., Merluzzi, T. V., Ewert, M., Ghan-nam, J. H., Hartley, D., and Stinson, C. H. (1991). Role-Relationship Models Configuration (RRMC). In M. J. Horowitz (Ed.), Personal Schemas and Maladaptive Interpersonal Patterns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29. Kachele, H. (1990). Une nouvelle perspective de recherche en Psychotherapie—le projet PEP. PPmP-Diskjoumal, 1(1).
30. Kachele, H., Dengler, D., Eckert, R., and Schnekenburger, S. (1990a). Veränderung des zentralen Beziehungskonfliktes durch eine Kurztherapie. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, medizinische Psychologie, 40, 178-185.
31. Kächele, H., Heldmaier, H, and Scheytt, N. (1990b). Fokusformulierungen als katamanestische Leitlinien. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, medizinische Psychologie, 35, 205-216.
32. Kächele, H., and Dahlbender, R. W. (1993). Übertragung und zentrale Beziehungsmuster. In P. Buchheim, M. Cierpka and Th. Seifert (Eds.), Lindauer Texte. Texte zur psychotherapeutischen Fort-und Weiterbildung (pp. 84-103). Berlin: Springer.
33. Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constucts. New York: Norton.
34. Kemberg, O. F. (1988). Innere Welt und äußere Realität. Anwendungen der Objektbeziehungstheorie. München: Verlag für Internationale Psychoanalyse.
35. Krause, R., and Lütolf, P. (1988). Facial indicators of transference processes within Psychoanalytic treatment. In H. Dahl, H. Kächele and H. Thomä (Eds.), Psychoanalytic process research strategies. Berlin: Springer.
36. Kreische, R., and Biskup, J. (1990). Die Untersuchung von zentralen Beziehungskonflikten in Paartherapien mit dem CCRT-Verfahren. Gruppenpsychotherapie und Gruppendynamik, 26, 161-172.
37. Labov, W., and Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts. Seattle, London: University of Washington Press.
38. Landis, J. R., and Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorial data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.
39. Luborsky, L. (1977). Measuring a pervasive psychic structure in psychotherapy: The core con-flictual relationship theme. In N. Freedman and S. Grand (Eds.), Communicative structures and psychic structures. New York: Plenum Press.
40. Luborsky, L. (1986). A set of standard categories for the CCRT. Edition 1, unpublished manuscript see L. Luborsky and P. Crits-Christoph (Eds.) (1990).
41. Luborsky, L. (1990a). A guide to the CCRT method. In L. Luborsky and P. Crits-Christoph (Eds.), (1990).
42. Luborsky, L. (1990b). Why each CCRT procedure was chosen. In L. Luborsky and P. Crits-Christoph (Eds.) (1990).
43. Luborsky, L. (1990c). The Relationship Anecdotes Paradigm (RAP) interview as a versatile source of narratives. In L. Luborsky and P. Crits-Christoph (Eds.) (1990).
44. Luborsky, L. (1993). Personal communication.
45. Luborsky, L., and Kächele, H. (1988). (Eds.) Der Zentrale Beziehungskonflikt: Ein Arbeitsbuch, Ulm: PSZ Verlag.
46. Luborsky, L., and Crits-Christoph, P. (Eds.). (1990). Understanding transference: The CCRT method. New York: Basic Books.
47. Luborsky, L., Barber, J., Schäffler, P., and Cacciola J. (1990). The narratives told during psychotherapy and the types of CCRT’s within them. In L. Luborsky and P. Crits-Christoph (Eds.) (1990).
48. Luborsky, L., Crits-Christoph, P., Friedman, S. H., Mark, D., and Schäffler, P. (1991a). Freud’s transference template compared with the Core Con-flictual Relationship Theme (CCRT): Illustrations by the two specimen cases. In M. J. Horowitz (Ed.), Person schemas and maladaptive interpersonal behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49. Luborsky, L., Albani, C., and Eckert, R. (1991b). Manual zur ZBKT-Methode (German translation with supplements of the Ulm CCRT group), PPmP Diskjoumal 3(2).
50. Luborsky, L., and Diguer, L. (1995). A novel CCRT reliability study: Reply to Znader et al. Psychotherapy Research, 5(3), 237-241.
51. Luborsky, L., Luborsky, E., Diguer, L., Schmidt, K., Dengler, D., Schäffler, P., Faude, J., Morris, M., Buchsbaum, H., and Emde, R. (1996). Extending the core relationship theme into early childhood. In G. Noam and K. Fisher (Eds.), Development and vulnerability in close relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Mehta, C. (1995). statxact. (User manual), Cambridge: Cytel Software Corporation.
53. Morgan, C. D., and Murray, H. A. (1938). Thematic Apperception Test. In H. A. Murray (Ed.), Explorations in personality: A clinical and experimental study of fifty men of college age. New York: Oxford University Press.
54. Moser, U., and Zeppelin, I. v. (1991). Kognitive-Affektive Prozesse. Berlin: Springer.
55. Pokomy, D. (1996): EXACT 1-3 User’s Guide. Department Psychotherapy, University Ulm.
56. Pokomy, D., Blaser, G., Kleiß, M., Kleiß, M., Kächele, H., and Dahlbender, R. W. (1996). Reliability of video vs. transcript CCRT ratings. European Meeting, Society for Psychotherapy Research, 4.-7. September 1996, Cernobbio.
57. Popp, C., Luborsky, L., and Crits-Christoph, P. (1990). The parallel of the CCRT from therapy narratives with the CCRT from dreams. In L. Luborsky and P. Crits-Christoph (Eds.) (1990).
58. Quasthoff, U. (1980). Gemeinsames Erzählen als Form und Mittel im sozialen Konflikt oder Ein Ehepaar erzählt eine Geschichte. In K. Ehlich (Ed.), Erzählen im Alltag. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
59. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
60. Sandler, J. (1989). Unconscious wishes and human relationships. Inj. Sandler (Ed.), Dimensions of Psychoanalysis. London: Karnac Books.
61. Soldz, S. (1993). Book review. Psychotherapy Research, 3, 69-73.
62. Schnekenburger, S. (1990). Die kontinuierliche Erhebung des zentralen Beziehungskonfliktes über den gesamten Verlauf einer Kurztherapie. Med. Diss., University Ulm.
63. Schütze, F. (1977). Die Technik des narrativen Interviews in Interaktionsfeldstudien, unpublished manuscript. University Bielefeld.
64. Zander, B., Strack, M., Cierpka, M., Reich, G., and Staats, H. (1995a). Coder agreement using the German Edition of Luborsky’s CCRT method in videotaped or transcribed RAP interviews. Psychotherapy Research 5 (2), 231-236.
65. Zander, B., Strack, M., Cierpka, M., Reich, G., and Staats, H. (1995b). Different reliabilities at the episode level and that of the final CCRT. A rejoinder to luborsky and Diguer. Psychotherapy Research 5 (2), 242-244.