Validity in qualitative research in psychology;Validita v kvalitativním psychologickém výzkumu

Ceskoslovenska Psychologie

Volumn 41, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 503-512

  Čermák, Ivo ^a   Štěpanǐková, Irena ^a  

^a PsÚ AV ČR ^*  (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Qualitative psychology; Qualitative research; Validity

Indexed keywords

EID: 0007784285     PISSN: 0009062X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Agar, M. (1986): Speaking of ethnography. Qualitative research methods series No. 2, London: Sage.
2. Altheide, D.L., Johnson, J.M. (1994): Criteria for assessing interpretive validity in qualitative research. In: Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.): Handbook of Qualitative Research (s. 485-499). Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage.
3. Bryman, A. (1988): Quantity and quality in social research. London: Unwin Hyman.
4. Denzin, N.K. (1989): Interpretive interactionism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5. Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y.S. (1994): Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In: Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.): Handbook of Qualitative Research (s. 1-17). Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage.
6. Derrida, J. (1979): Nietzsche's styles. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. Fielding, N.G., Fielding, J.L. (1986): Linking data. Qualitative research methods series No 4. London: Sage.
8. Fish, S. (1980): Is there a text in this class? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9. Fonow, M. M., Cook, J. A. (1991): Back to the future: A look at the second wave of feminist epistemology and methodology. In: Fonow, M. M., Cook, J. A. (Eds.): Beyond Methodology: Feminist Scholarship As Lived Research (s.1-15). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
10. Garfinkel, H. (1967): Studies in ethnometodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
11. Geertz, C. (1973): The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York: Basic Books.
12. Geertz, C. (1983): Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
13. Geertz, C. (1988): Works and lives: The antropologist as author. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
14. Glaser, B.C., Strauss, A. L. (1967): The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
15. Guba, E.G., Lincoln, Y. (1985): Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
16. Guba, E.G., Lincoln, Y. (1989): Fourth Generation Evaluation. London: Sage.
17. Guba, E.G. (1990): Subjectivity and objectivity. In: Eisner, E. W., Peskin, A. (Eds.): Qualitative Inquiry in Education. The Continuing Debate (s. 74-91). New York: Teachers College Press.
18. Hammersley, M. (1990): Reading ethnographic research. A critical guide. London: Longmans.
19. Hammersley, M. (1992): What's wrong with ethnography: Methodological explorations. London: Routledge.
20. Harré, R., Secord, P.F. (1972): The explanation of social behavior. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
21. Henwood, K., Pidgeon, N. (1992): Qualitative research and psychological theorising. British Journal of Psychology. 83, 97-111.
22. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology (1994), no 4, Vol.4.
23. Journal of Counselling Psychology (1994). Special section on qualitative research in counselling process and outcome. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 41, 427-512.
24. Kučera, M. (1992): Školní etnografie. Přehled problematiky. Studia Paedagogica, 8. Praha: PeDF UK.
25. Kvale, S. (1995): The social construction of validity. Qualitative Inquiry, 1, 1, 19-40.
26. Kvale, S. (1997): Interviews. London: Sage.
27. Lather, P. (1986): Issues of validity in openly ideological research: Between a rock and a soft place. Interchange, 17, 63-84.
28. Lather, P. (1993): Fertile obsession: Validity after poststructuralism. Sociological Quarterly, 34, 4, 673-693.
29. Leininger, M. (1994): Evaluation criteria and critique of qualitative research studies. In: Morse, J. M. (Ed.): Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 95-115.
30. Lincoln, Y.S., Denzin, N.K. (1994): The fifth moment. In: Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds.): Handbook of Qualitative Research (s. 575-586). Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage.
31. Lincoln, Y.S., Guba, E.G. (1985): Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
32. Linden, J. (1996): Theoretical and methodological questions concerning a contextual approach to psychosocial issues of working life. Science Communication, 18, 1, 59-79.
33. Mahoney, M.(1976): Scientist as subject: The psychological imperative. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Ballinger.
34. Mead, M. (1964/34): George Herbert Mead on Social Psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35. Miles, M.B., Huberman, M.A. (1994): Qualitative data analysis. 2nd edition. London: Sage.
36. Miller, W. L., Crabtree, B.F. (1994): Clinical research. In: Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds.): Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage, 340-352.
37. Patton, M. Q. (1990, 1980): Qualitative evaluation methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
38. Pedagogika. (1994): Vol. 44, No. 1., s. 37-80.
39. Popper, K., Eccles, J. (1977): The self and its brain. London: Springer-Verlag.
40. Scheurich, J.J. (1992): The paradigmatic transgressions of validity. (Nepublikovaný rukopis.)
41. Sloman, A. (1976): What are the aims of science? Radical Philosophy, spring, 7-17.
42. Smékal, V. (1983): Kvalitativní přístup v psychologickém výzkumu. Československá psychologie, 27, 1, 50-58.
43. Smith, J.A., Harré, R., Van Langenhove, L.V. (1995a): Introduction. In: Smith, J.A., Harre, R., Van Langenhove, L.V. (Eds.): Rethinking Methods in Psychology (s. 1-8). London: Sage.
44. Smith, J.A., Harré, R., Van Langenhove, L.V. (1995b): Introduction. In: Smith, J.A., Harré, R., Van Langenhove L.V. (Eds.): Rethinking Psychology (s.1-9). London: Sage.
45. Stanely, L., Wise, S. (1983): Breaking out. Feminist consciousness and feminist research. London: Routledge.
46. Todorov, T. (1977): The poetics of prose. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
47. Wolcott, H. F. (1990): On seeking - and rejecting - validity in qualitative research. In: Eisner, E. W., Peskin, A. (Eds.): Qualitative In-quiry in Education. The Continuing Debate. New York: Teachers College Press, 121-152.
48. Wolcott, H. F.(1994): Transforming qualitative data. Description, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage.