Competing redistricting plans as evidence of political motives: The North Carolina case

American Politics Research

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 147-176

  Gronke, Paul ^a   Wilson, J Matthew ^a,b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0007782245     PISSN: 1532673X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X99027002001     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Black, E., & Black, M. (1987). Politics and society in the South. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Brace, K., Grofman, B., & Handley, L. (1987). Does redistricting aimed to help Blacks necessarily help Republicans? Journal of Politics, 49, 169-185.
3. Butler, D., & Cain, B. (1992). Congressional redistricting. New York: Macmillan.
4. Canon, D. (1990). Actors, athletes, andastronauts: Political amateurs in the U.S. Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Canon, D., Schousen, M., & Sellers, P. (1994). A formula for uncertainty: Creating a Black majority district in North Carolina, In T. Kazee (Ed.), Who runs for Congress?: Ambition, context, and candidate emergence (pp. 23-44). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
6. Fowler, L., & McClure, R. (1989). Political ambition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
7. Gelman, A., & King, G. (1994a). Enhancing democracy through legislative redistricting. American Political Science Review, 88, 541-559.
8. Gelman, A., & King, G. (1994b). A unified method of evaluating electoral systems and redistricting plans. American Journal of Political Science, 38, 514-554.
9. Grofman, B. (1985). Criteria for districting: A social science perspective. UCLA Law Review, 33, 77-185.
10. Grofman, B., Handley, L., & Niemi, R. (1992). Minority representation and the quest for voting equality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. Kousser, M. (1995). Shaw v. Reno and the real world of redistricting and representation. Paper in the Department of Humanities and Social Sciences working paper series, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena.
12. Lublin, D. (1997). The paradox of representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13. Mayer, J. (1995). Shaw v. Reno: Three generations of jurists confront racial redistricting. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, Illinois.
14. Ostdiek, D. (1993). Changing representation: Predicting and detecting gerrymanders. Paper in the Department of Political Science working paper series, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
15. Ostdiek, D. (1995). Congressional redistricting and district typologies. Journal of Politics, 57, 533-543.
16. Scher, R. K., Mills, J. L., & Hotaling, J. J. (1997). Voting rights and democracy: The law and politics of districting. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
17. Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993).
18. Simon, D. (1993). Congressional redistricting for ambitious legislators. Unpublished undergraduate senior honors thesis, Department of Political Science, Duke University.
19. Swain, C. M. (1993). Blackfaces, Black interests. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Thernstrom, A. (1987). Whose votes count?: Affirmative action and minority voting rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Van Denton, T. (1991a, August 18th). A new political map. The News & Observer.
22. Van Denton, T. (1991b, October 1st). Party loyalty. Black gains clash in redistricting. The News & Observer, p. 1A
23. Van Denton, T. (1991c, May 5th). Redistricting plan defended, decried. The News & Observer, p.3B.
24. Voting Rights Act of 1965, 42 U.S.C. § 1973 (1982).