When finance leads planning: Urban planning, highway planning, and metropolitan freeways in California

Journal of Planning Education and Research

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 196-214

  Taylor, Brian D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0007678331     PISSN: 0739456X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X0002000206     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Agg, Thomas R., and John E. Brindley. 1927. Highway administration and finance. New York: McGraw-Hill.
2. Altshuler, A. 1965. Locating the intercity freeway. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
3. Barrett, Paul, and Mark H. Rose. 1999. Street smarts: The politics of transportation statistics in the American city: 1900-1990. Journal of Urban History 25 (3): 405-33.
4. Bartholomew, Harland. 1924. Alleviation and remedy of street congestion. Engineering News-Record 92 (18): 766-67.
5. _. 1925. The San Francisco Bay region: A statement concerning the nature and importance of a plan for future growth. San Francisco: The Regional Plan Association of the San Francisco Bay Counties, Inc.
6. Bartholomew, Harland, and Associates. 1932. Plans for major traffic thoroughfares and transit, Lower East Side, New York City. New York: Lower East Side Planning Association.
7. Brodsly, D. 1981. L.A. freeway: An appreciative essay. Berkeley: University of California Press.
8. Buel, R. A. 1972. Dead end: The automobile in mass transportation. Baltimore, MD: Penguin.
9. Burby, J. 1971. The great American motion sickness; or, why you can't get there from here. Boston: Little, Brown.
10. Burch, Philip H. 1962. Highway revenue and expenditure policy in the United States. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
11. California Department of Finance. 1997. California statistical abstract. Sacramento: Author.
12. California Department of Public Works. 1963-1973. Statistical reports of the Department of Public Works pertaining to the Division of Highways, Business and Transportation Agency. Sacramento: Author.
13. California Department of Transportation. 1974-1983. State Highway Program: Financial statements and statistical reports. Sacramento: Author.
14. _. 1983-1991. Annual financial statements and miscellaneous statistical reports. Sacramento: Author.
15. California Division of Highways. 1958. The California freeway system. Report to the Joint Interim Committee on Highway Problems. Sacramento: California Legislature.
16. Cheney, Charles H. 1928. Major traffic street plan and report: Riverside, California. Riverside, CA: Riverside City Planning Commission.
17. Chicago Plan Commission. 1925. Through traffic streets. Chicago: Author.
18. City Planning Commission. 1930. A report on a major street plan for the city of San Diego, California. San Diego, CA: Author.
19. Clark, A. C. 1955. Criteria for selection of additional interstate system routes at urban areas. Circular memorandum to Division and District Engineers, U.S. Bureau of Public Roads, Department of Commerce, 9 June.
20. Collier-Burns Highway Act. 1947. Sacramento: California State Printing Office.
21. Congressional Quarterly. 1964. Congress and the nation: A review of government and politics. Vol. 1. Washington, DC: Author.
22. Crawford, Finla Goff. 1932. The administration of the gasoline tax in the United States. 3d ed. Publication No. 30. New York: Municipal Administration Service.
23. _. 1939. Motor fuel taxation in the United States. Baltimore: Lord Baltimore Press.
24. DeLeuw, Charles E. 1939. A comprehensive superhighway plan for the city of Chicago. Chicago: Department of Superhighways.
25. Fairbank, H. S. 1937. Objects and methods of the state-wide highway planning surveys. American Highways 16(1): 22-26.
26. Foster, M. S. 1981. From streetcar to superhighway: American city planners and urban transportation, 1900-1940. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
27. Gifford, J. L. 1984. The innovation of the Interstate Highway System. Transportation Research A 18A (4): 319-32.
28. _. 1991. Historical antecedents and development impacts of highways of national significance: The conflict between technical and political criteria. Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting.
29. Hebert, R. 1972. Highways to nowhere: The politics of city transportation. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
30. Holley, H. F. 193?. The relation of grade crossing elimination to traffic development. Los Angeles: Automobile Club of Southern California.
31. Interregional Highway Committee. 1944. Interregional highways. 78th Cong., 2d sess., H. Doc. 379.
32. Jones, D. W. 1989. California's freeway era in historical perspective. Berkeley: University of California Institute of Transportation Studies.
33. Kay, Jane Holtz. 1997. Asphalt nation: How the automobile took over America, and how we can take it back. New York: Crown.
34. Kelly, B. 1971. The pavers and the paved. New York: Donald W. Brown.
35. Leavitt, H. 1970. Superhighway-superhoax. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
36. Lewis, Tom. 1997. Divided highways: Building the interstate highways. New York: Viking.
37. Lovelace, Eldridge. 1992. Harland Bartholomew: His contributions to American urban planning. Urbana: Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Illinois.
38. Lupo, A., F. Colcord, and E. P. Fowler. 1971. Rights of way: The politics of transportation in Boston and the U.S. city. Boston: Little, Brown.
39. MacDonald, Thomas H. 1936. Roads we should have. Address to the Annual Meeting of the Councilors of the American Automobile Association. Washington, DC: American Automobile Association.
40. _. 1954. The engineer's relation to highway transportation. Sixth Salzberg Memorial Lecture. College Station: Texas A&M University.
41. McClintock, Miller. 1927. A report on the street traffic control problem of San Francisco. San Francisco: San Francisco Traffic Survey Committee.
42. _. 1931. A traffic plan for the embarcadero. San Francisco: San Francisco Traffic Survey Committee.
43. _. 1937. A limited way plan for San Francisco. In Report on San Francisco citywide traffic survey, W.P.A. Project 6108-5863, 227-55. San Francisco: Department of Public Works.
44. Metropolitan Transportation Engineering Board. 1958. Proposed freeway and expressway system for Los Angeles, Orange, and Ventura counties. Report to the California Department of Public Works. Los Angeles: Author.
45. Mowbry, A. Q. 1969. Road to ruin. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.
46. Nolen, John. 1926. A comprehensive city plan for San Diego, California. San Diego, CA: The City Planning Commission, the Harbor Commission, the Park Commission of San Diego.
47. Olmstead, F., H. Bartholomew, and C. Cheney. 1924. A major traffic street plan for Los Angeles. Los Angeles: Committee on Los Angeles Plan of Major Highways, Traffic Commission of the City and County of Los Angeles.
48. Purcell, Charles H. 1940a. California Highway Program requires more federal aid for projects within cities - Part I. California Highways and Public Works (May): 1, 26.
49. _. 1940b. California Highway Program requires more federal aid for projects within cities - Part II. California Highways and Public Works (June): 15, 26, 28.
50. Rose, Mark H. 1990. Interstate: Express highway politics 1939-1989. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
51. Rose, Mark H., and Bruce E. Seely. 1990. Getting the interstate system built: Road engineers and the implementation of public policy, 1955-1985. Journal of Policy History 2 (1): 23-55.
52. Schaeffer, W. 1992. Interview by author. Sacramento, CA, 4 March and 14 May.
53. Schneider, K. R. 1971. Autokind versus mankind: An analysis of tyranny, a proposal for rebellion, a plan for reconstruction. New York: Norton.
54. Schwartz, G. T. 1976. Urban freeways and the interstate system. Southern California Law Review 49 (3): 406-513.
55. Seely, B. E. 1987. Building the American highway system: Engineers as policy makers. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
56. Smith, Wilbur, and Associates. 1961. Future highways and urban growth. New Haven, CT: Automobile Manufacturers Association.
57. Taylor, Brian D. 1995. Public perceptions, fiscal realities, and freeway planning: The California case. Journal of the American Planning Association 61 (1): 43-56.
58. Transportation Engineering Board. 1939. A transit program for the Los Angeles metropolitan area. Los Angeles: Author.
59. U.S. Bureau of Public Roads. 1939. Toll roads and free roads. 76th Cong., 1st sess., H. Doc. 272.
60. _. 1955. General location of national system of interstate highways: Including all additional routes at urban areas designated in September 1955. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
61. U.S. Congressional Budget Office. 1978. Highway assistance programs: A historical perspective. Background paper, Congress of the United States. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
62. U.S. Federal Highway Administration. 1946-1991. Highway statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation.
63. _. 1986. Highway statistics: Summary to 1985. Washington, DC: Department of Transportation.
64. Whitten, Robert. 1930. Report on a thoroughfare plan for Boston. Boston: The City Planning Board.
65. Zettel, R. M. 1959. The California Freeway Program: An economic and fiscal analysis. Joint Interim Committee on Highway Problems. Sacramento: California Legislature.
66. Zettel, R., and P. Shuldiner. 1959. Freeway location conflicts in California. Berkeley: University of California Institute of Transportation and Traffic Engineering.