Users and social science research: Policy, problems and possibilities

Sociological Research Online

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 1997, Pages

  Rappert, B ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0007597408     PISSN: 13607804     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5153/sro.109     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. ABRAHAM, J. (1995) Science, Politics and the Pharmaceutical industry. London: UCL Press.
2. BLUME, S. (1985) 'After the Darkest Hour... Integrity and Engagement in the Development of University Research' in F. Heller (editor) The Use and Abuse of Social Science Research. London: Sage.
3. CLARE, Emma (1997) '"Why can't I include that?" Negotiations of Power and Resistance in a Research Project', BSA Annual Conference, York: University of York.
4. CROOK, Stephen, Jan PAKULSKI and Malcolm WATERS (1994) Postmodernization. London: Sage.
5. du GAY, P. and G. SALAMAN (1992) The Cult[ure] of the Customer', Journal of Management Studies, vol. 29, no. 5.
6. ESRC (1995) Business directory. Swindon: ESRC.
7. ESRC (1996) Report on the Innovation Programme: Start-Up and Work in Progress Days. Cranfield University, 11 and 12 September. Towards Better Practice. October 1996.
8. ESRC (1997) Innovation Update: Issue 2.
9. ETZKOWITZ, Henry (1989) 'Entrepreneurial Science in Academy', Social Problems, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 14-29.
10. FAULKNER, Wendy and Jacqueline SENKER (1995) Knowledge Frontiers : Public Sector Research and Industrial Innovation. Oxford: OUP.
11. GILL, J. (1985) 'Research as Action: Experiment in Utilizing the Social Sciences' in F. Heller (editor) The Use and abuse of social science research. London: Sage.
12. HAMMERSLEY, M. and GOMM, R. (1997) 'Bias in Social Research', Sociological Research Online, vol. 2, no. 1, 〈http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/2/1/2.html〉.
13. HELLER, F. (editor) (1986) The Use and Abuse of Social Science Research. London: Sage.
14. HILL, Stephen and Tim TURPIN (1994) 'Academic Research Cultures in Collision' Science as Culture, vol. 4, pp. 327-362.
15. HMSO (1993) Realising our potential. London: HMSO.
16. KLEIN, L. and K. EASON (editors) (1991) Putting Social Science to Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. LAW, J. (editor) (1991) A Sociology of Monsters. London: Routledge.
18. LOVE, Philip (1995) 'Liverpool Keeps it in the Family', The Times Higher, Nov. 3: p. ii.
19. MUNCH, B. (1995) 'Danish Approaches in the Social Studies of Technology' Social Sciences: Similar Concerns, Different Styles? COST A4, Brussels: European Commission.
20. NATURE (1994) Nature, no. 372, p. 718.
21. OPINION LEADER RESEARCH (1997) Summary Report on a Consultancy Programme with users to Refresh the Key Themes Opinion. Leader Research Ltd: London.
22. RAPPERT, B. (1995) 'Shifting Notion of Accountability in Public- and Private-Sector Research in the UK', Science and Public Policy, December.
23. RIP, A. (1994) The Republic of Science in the 1990s', Higher Education, no. 1, pp. 3-23.
24. SEGAL QUINCE WICKSTEED (1992) Policy and Training Issues in Collaboration between Business and Social Science. Cambridge: Segal Quince Wicksteed.
25. TAPPER, E. R. and B. G. SALTER (1995) The Changing Idea of University Autonomy' Studies in Higher Education, vol. 20, no. 1.
26. TASKER, M. and D. PACKMAN (1993) 'Industry and Higher Education', Studies in Higher Education, vol. 18, no. 2.
27. WEBSTER, A. (1994) 'University-Corporate Ties and the Construction of Research Agendas', Sociology, vol. 28, pp. 123-142.
28. WEBSTER, A. (1997) The Thematic Priorities: A Synoptic Review', A report for the ESRC commissioned by The Policy and Evaluation Division.
29. WEBSTER, J. (1994) Sado-Monetarism or Social Science, Working Paper Series, University of East London.
30. WOOLGAR, S. (1997) Accountability and Identity in the Age of UABs, CRICT Discussion Paper, University of West London.