Personal growth in social context: A high school senior's search for meaning in and through writing

Written Communication

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 63-105

  Smagorinsky, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0007340725     PISSN: 07410883     EISSN: 15528472     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0741088397014001002     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ackerman, J. M. (1993). The promise of writing to learn. Written Communication, 10, 334-370.
2. Applebee, A. N. (1981). Writing in the secondary school: English and the content areas (NCTE Research Report No. 21). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
3. Atwell, N. (1987). In the middle: Writing, reading, and learning with adolescents. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
4. Braddock, R., Lloyd-Jones, R., & Schoer, L. (1963). Research in written composition. Champaign, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
5. Britton, J., Burgess, T., Martin, N., McLeod, A., & Rosen, H. (1975). The development of writing abilities: 11-18. London: Macmillan.
6. Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
7. Emig, J. (1971). The composing processes of twelfth graders (NCTE Research Report No. 13). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
8. Emig, J. (1977). Writing as a mode of learning. College Composition and Communication, 28, 122-128.
9. Fulwiler, T. (1989). Responding to student journals. In C. M. Anson (Ed.), Writing and response: Theory, practice, and research (pp. 149-173). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
10. Hillocks, G. (1975). Observing and writing. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
11. Hillocks, G. (1986). Research on written composition: New directions for teaching. Urbana, IL: National Conference on Research in English.
12. Kahn, E., Walter, C. C., & Johannessen, L. (1984). Writing about literature. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
13. Kirby, D., & Liner, T. (1988). Inside/out: Developmental strategies for teaching writing (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
14. Langer, J. A., & Applebee, A. N. (1987). How writing shapes thinking: A study of teaching and learning (NCTE Research Report No. 22). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
15. Marshall, J. D., Smagorinsky, P., & Smith, M. W. (1995). The language of interpretation: Patterns of discourse in discussions of literature (NCTE Research Report No. 27). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
16. Martin, N. (1984). Writing across the curriculum: Pamphlets from the Schools Council/London Institute of Education W.A.C. project. Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook.
17. Moffett, J. (1968). Teaching the universe of discourse. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
18. Murray, D. M. (1980). Writing as process: How writing finds its own meaning. In T. R. Donovan & B. W. McClelland (Eds.), Eight approaches to teaching composition (pp. 3-20). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
19. Nystrand, M. (1986). The structure of written communication. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
20. Rieber, R., & Carton, A. S. (1987). Editors' foreword. In R. Rieber & A. Carton (Eds.), N. Minick (Trans.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, Vol. 1: Problems of general psychology (pp. v-vii). New York: Plenum.
21. Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
22. Rosenthal, R. (1966). Experimenter effects in behavioral research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
23. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1975). The volunteer subject. New York: John Wiley.
24. Smagorinsky, P. (1995a). Constructing meaning in the disciplines: Reconceptualizing writing across the curriculum as composing across the curriculum. American Journal of Education, 103(2), 160-184.
25. Smagorinsky, P. (1995b). The social construction of data: Methodological problems of investigating learning in the zone of proximal development. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 191-212.
26. Smagorinsky, P., & Coppock, J. (1994). Cultural tools and the classroom context: An exploration of an alternative response to literature. Written Communication, 11, 283-310.
27. Smagorinsky, P., & Coppock, J. (1995a). The reader, the text, the context: An exploration of a choreographed response to literature. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27, 271-298.
28. Smagorinsky, P., & Coppock, J. (1995b). Reading through the lines: An exploration of drama as a response to literature. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 11, 369-391.
29. Taylor, C. (1985). Philosophy and the human sciences: Philosphical papers II. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30. Vygotsky, L. S. (1934). Myshlenie i rech': Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. Moscow and Leningrad: Gosudarstvennoe Sotsial'no-Ekonomicheskio Izdatel'stvo.
31. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language (A. Kozulin, Ed. and Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In R. Rieber & A. Carton (Eds.), N. Minick (Trans.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, Vol. 1: Problems of general psychology. New York: Plenum.
34. Wells, G. (1996, February). Making meaning with text: A genetic approach to the mediating role of writing in activity. Paper presented at the Midwinter Conference of the Assembly for Research of the National Council of Teachers of English, A Vygotsky Centennial: Vygotskian Perspectives on Literacy Research, Chicago.
35. Wertsch, J. V. (1996, February). Vygotsky's two minds on the nature of meaning. Paper presented at the Midwinter Conference of the Assembly for Research of the National Council of Teachers of English, A Vygotsky Centennial: Vygotskian Perspectives on Literacy Research, Chicago.