Department heads as middle managers? Questioning the black box

School Leadership and Management

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 345-358

  Hannay, Lynne M ^a   Ross, John A ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0007249895     PISSN: 13632434     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13632439969096     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. Brown, M. and Rutherford, D. (1998) Changing roles and raising standards: new challenges for heads of department. School Leadership & Management, 18:1, pp. 75-88.
2. Hannay, L. (1996) The role of images in the secondary school change process. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 2:1, pp. 105-121.
3. Hannay, L. and Ross, J. (1997) Initiating secondary school reform: the dynamic relationship between restructuring, reculturing, and retiming. Educational Administration Quarterly, 33, pp. 576-603.
4. Siskin, L. S. and Little, J. W. (1995) The Subject Department: continuities and critiques
5. Ball, S. J. and Bowe, R. (1992) Subject departments and the 'implementation' of National Curriculum policy: an overview of the issues. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24:2, pp. 97-115.
6. Dellar, G. (1996) The nature of secondary school organization and site specific re-structuring. International Journal of Educational Reform, 5:4
7. Dimmock, C. (1995) Restructuring for school effectiveness: leading, organising and teaching for effective learning. Educational Management and Administration, 23:1, pp. 5-18.
8. Gorman, K. L. (1982) Responsibilities of secondary business department heads. Business Education Forum, 36:8, pp. 24-31.
9. Harris, A., Jamieson, I. and Russ, J. (1995) A study of 'effective' departments in secondary schools. School Organisation, 15:3, pp. 283-299.