Making sense of the census: It's political

PS - Political Science and Politics

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 801-802

  Brunell, Thomas L ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0007206097     PISSN: 10490965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1049096500062028     Document Type: Review

References (8)

1. Anderson, Margo, and Stephen Fienberg. 2000. "Partisan Politics at Work: Sampling and the 2000 Census." PS: Political Science and Politics 33(4).
2. Breiman, Leo. 1994. "The 1991 Census Adjustment: Undercount or Bad Data?" Statistical Science 9:458-537.
3. Brown, Lawrence D., Morris L. Eaton, David A. Freedman, Stephen P. Klein, Richard A. Olshen, Kenneth W. Wachter, Martin T. Wells, and Donald Ylvisaker. 1999. "Statistical Controversies in Census 2000." Jurimetrics 39(Summer): 347-75.
4. Forrero, Juan. 2000. "Census Workers Say Supervisors Encouraged Filing of False Data." The New York Times, July 28, 2000, B1.
5. Skerry, Peter. 2000. Counting on the Census? Race, Group Identity, and the Evasion of Politics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
6. Stark, P.B. 1999. "Differences Between the 1990 and 2000 Census Adjustment Plans, and Their Impact on Error." Technical Report 550. Berkeley: Department of Statistics, University of California.
7. U. S. Department of Commerce. Office of the Secretary. 1991. "Decision on Whether or Not a Statistical Adjustment of the 1990 Decennial Census of Population Should Be Made for Coverage Deficiencies Resulting in an Overcount or Undercount of the Population; Explanation." Federal Register 56: 33582-642.
8. Wachter, Kenneth W., and David A. Freedman. 2000. "The Fifth-Cell: Correlation Bias in U.S. Census Adjustment." Evaluation Review 24(April): 191-211.