Asserting the smallness of effects in ANOVA

MPR-online

Volumn 6, Issue , 2001, Pages 1-32

  Lecoutre, Bruno ^a   Derzko, Gérard ^b  

^a Université de Rouen Normandie   (France)

^b SANOFI   (France)

Author keywords

Bayesian methods; Bioequivalence; Effect sizes; Individual bioequivalence; Interval estimates; Two one sided tests procedure

Indexed keywords

EID: 0007152236     PISSN: 14328534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (81)

1. Anderson, S. & Hauck, W.W. (1983). A new procedure for testing equivalence in comparative bioavailability and other clinical trials. Communications in Statistics, Theory and Methods, 12, 2663-2692.
2. Bakan, D. (1966). The test of significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 423-437.
3. Bartko, J.J. (1991). Proving the null hypothesis. American Psychologist, 46, 1089.
4. Berger, G.O. (1985). Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis. New-York: Springer Verlag.
5. Berger, R.L. & Hsu, J.C. (1996). Bioequivalence trials, intersection-union tests and equivalence confidence sets (with comments). Statistical Science, 11, 283-319.
6. Binder, A. (1963). Further considerations on testing the null hypothesis and the strategy and tactics of investigating theoretical models. Psychological Review, 70, 107-115.
7. Bofinger, E. (1992). Expanded confidence intervals, one-sided tests and equivalence testing. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 2, 181-188.
8. Bondy, W.A. (1969). A test of an experimental hypothesis of negligible difference between means. The American Statistician, 23, 28-30.
9. Box, G.E.P. & Tiao, J.W. (1973). Bayesian inference in statistical analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
10. Brandstätter, E. (1999). Confidence intervals as an alternative to significance testing. Methods in Psychological Research Online, Vol. 4 No. 2. http://www. mpr-online.de.
11. Brown, L.D., Hwang, J.T.G. & Munk, A. (1997). An unbiased test for the bioequivalence problem. The Annals of Statistics, 25, 2345-2367.
12. Cannon, D.S., Bell, W.E., Fowler, D.R., Penk, W.E., Finkelstein, A.S. (1990). MMPI differences between alcoholics and drug abusers: Effects of age and race. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2, 51-55.
13. Chow, S.L. (1996). Statistical significance: rationale, validity and utility. London: Sage.
14. Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 145-153.
15. nd edition. New-York: Academic Press.
16. Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p ≤ .05). American Psychologist, 49, 997-1003. With replies in American Psychologist, 1995, 50, 1098-1103.
17. Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p ≤ .05). American Psychologist, 49, 997-1003. With replies in American Psychologist, 1995, 50, 1098-1103.
18. Deheuvels, P. (1984). How to analyze bio-equivalence studies? The right use of confidence intervals. Journal of Organizational Behaviour and Statistics, 1, 1-15.
19. Edwards, W. (1965). Tactical note on the relation between scientific and statistical hypotheses. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 400-402.
20. Edwards, W., Lindman, H. & Savage, L.J. (1963). Bayesian statistical inference for psychological research. Psychological Review, 70, 193-242.
21. Efron, B. (1998). R.A. Fisher in the 21st century (with discussion). Statistical Science, 13, 95-122.
22. FDA (1992). Draft recommendation on statistical procedures for bioequivalence studies using the standard two-treatment crossover design. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD.
23. Fisher, R.A. (1962). Some examples of Bayes's method of the experimental determination of probabilities a priori. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 24, 118-124.
24. Fisher, R.A. (1990). Statistical methods, experimental design, and scientific inference (Re-issue). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Fowler, R.L. (1984). Approximating probability levels for testing null hypotheses with noncentral F distributions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44, 275-281.
26. Fowler, R.L. (1985). Testing for substantive significance in applied research by specifying nonzero effect null hypotheses. Journal of Applied Statistics, 70, 215-218.
27. Frick, R.W. (1996). The appropriate use of null hypothesis testing. Psychological Methods, 1, 379-390.
28. Goodman, S.N. & Berlin, J.A. (1994). The use of predicted confidence intervals when planning experiments and the misuse of power when interpreting results. Annals of Internal Medicine, 121, 200-206.
29. Harcum, E.R. (1990). Methodological versus empirical literature: Two views on casual acceptance of the null hypothesis. American Psychologist, 45, 404-405.
30. Hodges, J.L. & Lehmann, E.L. (1954). Testing the approximate validity of statistical hypotheses. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 16, 261-268.
31. Holender, D. & Bertelson, P. (1975). Selective preparation and time uncertainty. Acta Psychologica, 39, 193-203.
32. Hsu, J.C., Hwang, J.T.G., Liu H.-K. & Ruberg, S.J. (1994). Confidence intervals associated with tests for bioequivalence. Biometrika, 81, 103-114.
33. st edition: 1939). Oxford: Clarendon.
34. nd edition). Belmont: Brook-Cole.
35. Lecoutre, B. (1985). How to derive Bayes-fiducial conclusions from usual significance tests. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 5, 553-563.
36. Lecoutre, B. (1996). Traitement statistique des données expérimentales: Des pratiques traditionnelles aux pratiques bayésiennes (with Bayesian Windows programs by B. Lecoutre and J. Poitevineau, freely available at the Internet address http://www.univ-rouen.fr/ LMRS /Persopage/Lecoutre/pac.htm). Montreuil (France): CISIA.
37. Lecoutre, B. (1999). Two useful distributions for Bayesian predictive procedures under normal models. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 77, 93-105.
38. Lecoutre, B. & Charron, C. (2000). Bayesian procedures for prediction analysis of implication hypotheses in 2 x 2 contingency tables. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25, 185-201.
39. Lecoutre, B., Derzko, G. & Grouin, J.-M. (1995). Bayesian predictive approach for inference about proportions. Statistics in Medicine, 14, 1057-1063.
40. Lecoutre, B., Guigues, J.-L. & Poitevineau, J. (1992). Distribution of quadratic forms of multivariate Student variables. Applied Statistics, 41, 617-627.
41. Lecoutre, B., Lecoutre, M.-P. & Poitevineau, J. (2001). Uses, abuses and misuses of significance tests in the scientific community: won't the Bayesian choice be unavoidable? International Statistical Review, 69, to appear.
42. Lecoutre, B., Mabika, B. & Derzko, G. (2001). Assessment and monitoring in clinical trials when survival curves have distinct shapes in two groups: a Bayesian approach with Weibull modeling illustrated in higher risk patients of EMIAT. Statistics in Medicine, to appear.
43. Lecoutre, B. & Poitevineau, J. (1992). PAC (Programme d'Analyse des Comparaisons): Manuel de référence. Montreuil, France: CISIA-CERESTA (a limited version of this Windows program for analysis of variance is freely available at Internet address http://www.univ-rouen.fr/LMRS/ Persopage/Lecoutre/pac.htm).
44. Lecoutre, M.-P. (1992). Cognitive models and problem spaces in "purely random" situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23, 557-568.
45. nd edition (pp. 65-95). Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
46. nd edition). Wiley: New York.
47. Mandallaz, D. & Mau, J. (1981). Comparison of different methods for decision-making in bioequivalence assessment. Biometrics, 37, 213-222.
48. Munk, A. (2000). An unbiased test for the average equivalence problem: The small sample case. Journal of Statistical Planning And Inference, 87, 69-86.
49. Murphy, K.R. & Myors, B. (1999). Testing the hypothesis that treatments have negligible effects: Minimum-effect tests in the general linear model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 234-248
50. Novick, M.R. & Jackson, P.H. (1974). Statistical methods for educational and psychological research. New York: McGraw-Hill.
51. Patel, H.I. & Gupta, G.D. (1984). A problem of equivalence in clinical trials. Biometrical Journal, 33, 1225-1230.
52. Perlman, M.D. & Wu, L. (1999). The emperor's new tests. Statistical Science, 14, 355-369.
53. Phillips, L.D. (1973). Bayesian statistics for social scientists. London: Nelson.
54. Richardson, J.T.E. (1996). Measures of effect size. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 28, 12-22.
55. Rindskopf, D. (1997). Testing "small", not null, hypotheses: Classical and Bayesian approaches. In L.L. Harlow, S.A. Mulaik et J.H. Steiger (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests (pp. 319-332). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
56. Rindskopf, D. (1998). Null-hypothesis tests are not completely stupid, but Bayesian statistics are better. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 215-216.
57. Rocke, D.M. (1984). On testing for bioequivalence. Biometrics, 40, 220-225.
58. Rogers, J.L., Howard, K.I. & Vessey, J. (1993). Using significance tests to evaluate equivalence between two experimental groups. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 553-565.
59. Rouanet, H. (1996). Bayesian procedures for assessing importance of effects. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 149-158.
60. nd edition). Bern, CH: Peter Lang.
61. Rouanet, H. & Lecoutre, B. (1983). Specific inference in ANOVA: From significance tests to Bayesian procedures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 36, 252-268.
62. Rouanet, H., Lépine, D. & Pelnard-Considère, J. (1976). Bayes-fiducial procedures as practical substitutes for misplaced significance testing: An application to educational data. In D.N.M. De Gruijter & L.J.T. Van Der Kamp (Eds.), Advances in psychological and educational measurement (pp. 33-50). New York: Wiley.
63. nd edition, (pp. 227-254). Bern, CH: Peter Lang.
64. Rozeboom, W.W (1960). The fallacy of the hypothetico-deductive significance test. Psychological Bulletin, 57, 416-428.
65. Schall, R. (1995). Assessment of individual and population bioequivalence using the probability that bioavailabilities are similar. Biometrics, 51, 615-626.
66. Schall, R. & Luus, H.G. (1993). On population and individual equivalence. Statistics in Medicine, 12, 1109-1124.
67. Schervish, M.J. (1995). Theory of statistics. New York: Springer Verlag.
68. Schuirmann, D.J. (1987). A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 15, 657-680.
69. Selwyn, W.J., Dempster, A.P. & Hall, N.R. (1981). A Bayesian approach to bioequivalence for the 2 x 2 changeover design. Biometrics, 37, 11-21.
70. Selwyn, W.J. & Hall, N.R. (1984). On Bayesian methods for bioequivalence. Biometrics, 40, 1103-1108.
71. Selwyn, W.J., Hall N.R. & Dempster, A.P. (1985). Letter to the Editor. Biometrics, 41, 561.
72. Serlin, R.C. & Lapsley, D.K. (1985). Rationality in psychological research: The good-enough principle. American Psychologist, 40, 77-83.
73. Serlin, R.C. & Lapsley, D.K. (1993). Rational appraisal of psychological research and the good-enough principle. In G. Keren & C. Lewis (Eds.), A handbook for data analysis in the behavioral sciences. Vol 1: Methodological issues (pp. 199-228). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
74. Shrout, P.E. (1997). Should significance tests be banned? Introduction to a special section exploring the pros and cons. Psychological Science, 8, 1-2.
75. Spiegelhalter, D.J., Freedman, L.S. & Parmar M.K.B. (1994). Bayesian approaches to randomized trials. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 157, 357-416.
76. Wang, Y.H. (2000). Fiducial Intervals: What are they? The American Statistician, 54, 105-111.
77. Wellek, S. & Michaelis, J. (1991). Elements of significance testing with equivalence problems. Methods of Information in Medicine, 30, 194-198.
78. Westlake, W.J. (1981). Response to bioequivalence testing: A need to rethink (reader reaction response). Biometrics, 37, 591-593.
79. Wilkinson, L. and Task Force on Statistical Inference, APA Board of Scientific Affairs (1999). Statistical Methods in Psychology Journals: Guidelines and Explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594-604.
80. Wilson, W.R., Miller, H.L. & Lower, J.S. (1967). Much ado about the null hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 67, 188-196.
81. Winkler, R.L. (1974). Statistical analysis: Theory versus practice. In C.-A.S. Staël Von Holstein (Ed.), The concept of probability in psychological experiments (pp. 127-140). Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company.