Personal loyalty to superiors in public service

Criminal Justice Ethics

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 44-62

  Souryal, Sam S ^a   McKay, Brian W ^a  

^a SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0007101777     PISSN: 0731129X     EISSN: 19375948     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0731129X.1996.9992018     Document Type: Article

References (108)

1. Max Weber, quoted in D. WRONG, MAX WEBER 3 (1970).
2. G. FLETCHER, LOYALTY (1991).
3. Kleinig, Symposium: Editor's Introduction, 12 CRIM. JUST. ETHICS, 34 (Winter/Spring 1993).
4. Pettit, The Paradox of Loyalty, 25 AM. PHIL. Q. 163 (1988).
5. Kleinig, Loyalty and Public Service, THE PUBLIC INTEREST 2 (1994).
6. J. Q. WILSON, THE MORAL SENSE 23 (1993).
7. G. FLETCHER, supra note 2, at 61.
8. Kleinig, supra note 5.
9. THE FEDERALIST NO. 51 (J. Madison).
10. H. BLAMIRES, THE CHRISTIAN MIND 24 (1963).
11. R. HUMMEL, THE BUREAUCRATIC EXPERIENCE 234 (1994).
12. D. GATES & D. SHAH, CHIEF 448 (1993).
13. S. SOURYAL, POLICE ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT 185 (1977);
14. Delattre, Ethics in Public Service: Higher Standards or Double Standards, 8 CRIM. JUST. ETHICS, 2 (Summer/Fall 1989);
15. T. BARKER & D. CARTER, POUCE DEVIANCE (1986).
16. Kleinig, supra note 5, at 1.
17. Id. at 1.
18. Kleinig, supra note 3, at 34.
19. H. BLAMIRES, supra note 10, at 24.
20. B. Byrd, Incantations of Loyalty, 13 LAW & PHIL. 249 (1994).
21. Id. at 246.
22. S. SOURYAL, ETHICS IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE 15 (1992).
23. R. HUMMEL, supra note 11, at 234.
24. Denhardt, Images of Death and Slavery in Organizational Life, 13 J. MGMT. 79 (1987).
25. J. KLEINIG, THE ETHICS OF POLICING 144 (1996).
26. H. BLAMIRES, supra note 10, at 24.
27. G. FLETCHER, supra note 2, at 8.
28. Kleinig, supra note 5, at 2.
29. J. KLEINIG, supra note 24, at 144.
30. Id. at 143.
31. Kleinig, supra note 5, at 311.
32. W. OUCHI, THEORY Z 139-41 (1981).
33. Denhardt, supra note 23;
34. Delattre, supra note 13;
35. G. FLETCHER, supra note 2;J.Q. WILSON, supra note 6;
36. S. SOURYAL, supra note 13;
37. Smith, Team Players, TRAINING TODAY 63 (1993);
38. Ewin, Loyalties, and Why Loyalty Should be Ignored, 12 CRIM.JUST. ETHICS 36 (Winter/Spring 1993);
39. Richards, A Question ofLoyalty, 12 CRIM. JUST. ETHICS 48 (Winter /Spring 1993);
40. Kleinig, supra note 5;
41. J. KLEINIG, supra note 24.
42. Denhardt, supra note 23, at 76.
43. M. WEBER, THE THEORY OF SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC ORGANIZATION 343 (1947).
44. Id. at 325.
45. Id. at 341.
46. Id. at 342.
47. Id. at 342.
48. D. WREN, THE EVOLUTION OF MANAGEMENT THOUGHT 25(1994).
49. M. WEBER, supra note 35, at 328.
50. H. BLAMIRES, supra note 10, at 24.
51. S. SOURYAL, supra note 13, at 3.
52. J. KLEINIG, supra note 24, at 142-143.
53. J.Q. WILSON, supra note 6, at 99.
54. Id. at 100.
55. Id. at 99.
56. Id. at 101.
57. Id. at 131.
58. Id. at 101.
59. Id. at 100-103.
60. H. BLAMIRES, supra note 10, at 24.
61. Chisholm, Supererogation and Offence, 5 RATIO 11-14 (1963).
62. D. HEYD, SUPEREROGATION 118 (1982).
63. 58 Id. at 2.
64. 59 Id. at 17.
65. 60 Id. at 20.
66. M. LUTHER, WORKS 213 (1957).
67. D. RICHARDS, A THEORY OF REASONS FOR ACTION 196-97 (1971).
68. D. HEYD, supra note 56, at 9.
69. 64 Id. at 9.
70. 65 Id. at 5.
71. 66 Id. at 10.
72. H. BLAMIRES, supra note 10, at 24.
73. J. Q. WILSON, supra note 6, at 147.
74. Denhardt, supra note 23, at 13.
75. J. SCHAAR, LOYALTY IN AMERICA 6 (1957).
76. Commission to Investigate Allegations of Police Corruption and Anti-Corruption Procedures of the New York City Police Department, 11-13 (December 1993).
77. A. GORE, CREATING A GOVERNMENT THAT WORKS BETTERAND COSTS LESS (1993).
78. F. HERZBERG, THE MANAGERIAL CHOICE 15 (1970).
79. Letter from J. Kleinig to Sam Souryal (June 21, 1995).
80. Id. This argument for limited personal loyalty is not meant to rule out the vigorous disagreements that may take place between the Minister and the bureaucrats behind the scenes. The argument simply rules out public disagreement, and the undermining of the Minister's authority that that would cause.
81. D. GATES & D. SHAH, supra note 13, at 88.
82. Id. at 410.
83. T. SHIBUTANI & K. KWAN, ETHNIC STRATIFICATION: A COMPARATIVE APPROACH 342-71 (1965);
84. F. HERZBERG, supra note 75, at 98;
85. H. SIMON, ADMINISTRATIVE BEHAVIOR 198-219 (3rd ed.1976).
86. Denhardt, supra note 23, at 79.
87. Ewin, supra note 32, at 39.
88. Richards, supra note 32, at 49.
89. Denhardt, supra note 23.
90. T. DENISE & S. PETERFREUND, GREAT TRADITIONS IN ETHICS191-92 (1992).
91. ST. AUGUSTINE, DE CIVITATE DEI, Bk 5, chs. 19-21.
92. P. WIENER, ENCYCLOPEDIA OF PHILOSOPHY 112 (1967).
93. J. SCHAAR, supra note 70, at 59.
94. Illustrations and explanations can be found in Sherman,Learning Police Ethics, 1 CRIM. JUST. ETHICS 10-19 (Winter/Spring 1982);
95. Murphy, Ethical Issues in Policing, 4 CRIM. JUST. ETHICS 93-96 (Summer/Fall 1985);
96. Kania, Should We Tell the Police to Say Yes to Gratuities?, 7 CRIM. JUST. ETHICS 37-48 (Summer/Fall 1988);
97. Delattre, supra note 32, at 79-83.
98. Smith, supra note 32, at 63.
99. HOUSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, THE VALUES AND PRINCIPLES OF THE HOUSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT (1995).
100. R. HUMMEL, supra note 11, at 143.
101. G. FLETCHER, supra note 2, at 12.
102. Kleinig, supra note 3.
103. Id. at 7.
104. S. SOURYAL, supra note 13;
105. F. HERZBERG, supra note 75.
106. S. SOURYAL, supra note 13;
107. Ewin, Loyalty and Virtues, 42 PHIL. Q. 403-19(1992).
108. J. KINNEY & D. JOHNSON, BREAKING POINT 21 (1993).