|
|
|
Volumn 23, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 103-140
|
|
Growing pains: disputes surrounding human reproductive interests stretch the boundaries of traditional legal concepts.
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
CRYOPRESERVATION;
DAVIS V. DAVIS;
DIVORCE;
EMBRYO;
EMBRYO DISPOSITION;
FEMALE;
FERTILIZATION IN VITRO;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
GERM CELL;
GOVERNMENT;
HECHT V. SUPERIOR COURT;
HUMAN;
INFERTILITY THERAPY;
KASS V. KASS;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
MALE;
MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT;
ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT;
UNITED STATES;
YORK V. JONES;
DAVIS V. DAVIS;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
HECHT V. SUPERIOR COURT;
KASS V. KASS;
LEGAL APPROACH;
YORK V. JONES;
CRYOPRESERVATION;
DIVORCE;
EMBRYO;
EMBRYO DISPOSITION;
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT;
FEMALE;
FERTILIZATION IN VITRO;
GERM CELLS;
HUMANS;
LEGISLATION, MEDICAL;
MALE;
OWNERSHIP;
REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES, ASSISTED;
STATE GOVERNMENT;
UNITED STATES;
|
|
EID: 0007086125
PISSN: 03618951
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (2)
|
|
References (0)
|
