On the nature of audit judgements: The case of value for money studies

Public Administration

Volumn 77, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 509-525

  Keen, Justin ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0007069678     PISSN: 00333298     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9299.00165     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Argyris, C., R. Putnam and D. Smith. 1985. Action science. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
2. Bailey, K. 1994. Typologies and taxonomies. London: Sage.
3. Barley, N. 1986. The innocent anthropologist: notes from a mud hut. Penguin: Harmondsworth.
4. Barzelay, M. 1997. Central audit institutions and performance auditing: a comparative analysis of organisational strategies in the OECD, Governance 10, 235-60.
5. Bruner, J. 1986. Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. Chelimsky, E. 1985. Comparing and contrasting auditing and evaluation: some notes on their relationship', Evaluation Review 9, 483-503.
7. Committee of Public Accounts. 1986. Redundancy compensation payments to university staff. HC 179, Session 1985-86. London: HMSO.
8. Glynn, J., A. Gray and B. Jenkins. 1992. 'Auditing the three Es: the challenge of effectiveness', Public Policy and Administration 7, 56-70.
9. Hammond, K. 1996. Human judgment and social policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Henkel, M. 1991. Government, evaluation and change. London: Jessica Kingsley.
11. House of Commons. 1983. National Audit Act. London: HMSO.
12. National Audit Office. 1996a. Criminal legal aid means testing in the magistrates' courts. HC 615, Session 1995-96. London: Stationery Office.
13. _. 1996b. The award of the first three passenger rail franchises. HC 701, Session 1995-96. London: Stationery Office.
14. _. 1996c. Health of the nation: a progress report. HC 656, Session 1995-96. London: Stationery Office.
15. _. 1996d. The Department of Trade and Industry Redundancy Payments Senncei management and recovery of debt. HC 695, Session 1995-96. London: Stationery Office.
16. _. 1996e. Progress in completing the new British Library. HC 362, Session 1995-96. London: HMSO.
17. _. 1997. Annual report 1997. London: NAO.
18. Pollitt, C. and H. Summa. 1996. 'Travellers' tales', in E. Chelimsky and W. Shadish (eds.), Evaluation: a handbook for the 21st century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. _. 1997. 'Reflexive watchdogs? How supreme audit institutions account for themselves', Public Administration 75, 313-36.
20. Power, M. 1997. The audit society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Roberts, S. and C. Pollitt. 1994. 'Audit or evaluation? A National Audit Office value for money study, Public Administration 72, 527-49.
22. Silverman, D. 1993. Interpreting qualitative data. London: Sage.
23. Woolgar, S. 1991. Configuring the user: the case of usability trials, in J. Law (ed.), A sociology of monsters: essays on power, technology and domination. London: Routledge.