Material and presentation condition effects on sentence interpretation task performance: Methodological examinations of the competition experiment

Second Language Research

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 66-91

  Sasaki, Yoshinori ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0007066209     PISSN: 02676583     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/026765897666381479     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bates, E. and MacWhinney, B. 1981: Second-language acquisition from a functionalist perspective: pragmatic, semantic, and perceptual strategies. In Winitz, H. editor, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences conference on native and foreign language acquisition, New York: New York Academy Press, 190–214.
2. Bates, E. and MacWhinney, B. 1989: Functionalism and the competition model. In MacWhinney, B. and Bates, E., editors, The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing, New York: Cambridge University Press, 3–73.
3. Bock, J.K. and Miller, C.A. 1991: Broken agreement.Cognitive Psychology 23, 45–93.
4. Boland, J.E., Tanenhaus, M.K., Carlson, G. and Garnsey, S.M. 1989: Lexical projection and the interaction of syntax and semantics in parsing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 18, 563–576.
5. Corrigan, R. 1986: The internal structure of English transitive sentences. Memory and Cognition 14, 420–431.
6. Endo, M.S. 1986:supplementary grammar notes to ‘An introduction to modern Japanese. Part 1’. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
7. Gibson, E. 1992: On the adequacy of the competition model.Language 68, 812–830.
8. Hopper, P.J. and Thompson, S. 1980: Transitivity in grammar and discourse.Language 56, 251–299.
9. Ito, T., Tahara, T. and Park, W. 1989: Japanese particles as case markers: developmental psycholinguistic comparison between Japanese and Korean, and within Japanese (in Japanese). In Peng, F.C.C., Peng, V.M., Miyake, H., Sasaki, M. and Watanabe, T., editors, Language in the individual and society, Hiroshima: Bunka-Hyoron, 93–111.
10. Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. 1980:Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL University of Chicago Press.
11. MacWhinney, B. 1987: The competition model. In MacWhinney, B., editor, Mechanisms of language acqusition, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, 249–308.
12. MacWhinney, B. and Bates, E. 1984: Cue validity and sentence interpretation in English, German, and Italian.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 23, 127–150.
13. MacWhinney, B. and Bates, E., editors, 1989:The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. Massaro, D.W. and Cohen, M.M. 1983: Phonological context in speech perception.Perception and Psychophysics 34, 338–348.
15. MacDonald, J.L. 1986: The development of sentence comprehension strategies in English and Dutch.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 41, 317–335.
16. MacDonald, J.L. 1987: Sentence interpretation in bilingual speakers of English and Dutch.Applied Psycholinguistics 8, 379–413.
17. McDonald, J.L. and MacWhinney, B. 1995: The time course of anaphor resolution: effects of implicit verb causality and gender.Journal of Memory and Language 34, 543–566.
18. Sasaki, Y. 1991: English and Japanese interlanguage comprehension strategies: an analysis based on the competition model.Applied Psycholinguistics 12, 47–73.
19. Sasaki, Y. 1992: Paths of processing strategy transfers in Japanese and English as foreign languages: a competition model approach. PhD thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
20. Sasaki, Y. 1994: Paths of processing strategy transfers in Japanese and English as foreign languages:a competition model approach.Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16, 43–72.
21. Sasaki, Y. 1996:Processing and learning of Japanese causative sentences: an error-feedback paradigm. Discussion Papers in Asian Business and Language Studies 1. Sidney: University of New South Wales.
22. Tanenhaus, M.K., Boland, J., Garnsey, S.M. and Carlson, G.N. 1989: Lexical structure in parsing long-distance dependencies.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 18, 37–50.