Evaluation of Oral Reading Rate as a Curriculum-Based Measure Within Literature-Based Curriculum

Journal of School Psychology

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 183-197

  Bradley Klug, Kathy L ^a   Shapiro, Edward S ^b   Lutz, J Gary ^b   Dupaul, George J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Curriculum based measurement; Literature based series; Oral reading rate

Indexed keywords

EID: 0007059447     PISSN: 00224405     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-4405(98)00004-1     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Deno S.L. The nature and development of curriculum-based measurement. Preventing School Failure. 36:1992;5-10.
2. Deno S.L., Mirkin P.K., Chiang B. Identifying valid measures of reading. Exceptional Children. 49:1982;36-45.
3. Deno S.L., Mirkin P.K. Data-based program modification. A manual:1977;Council for Exceptional Children, Reston, VA.
4. Derr-Minneci T.F., Shaprio E.S. Validating curriculum-based measurement in reading from a behavioral perspective. School Psychology Quarterly. 7:1992;2-16.
5. Fry E. A readability formula that saves time. Journal of Reading. 11:1968;513-516.
6. Fuchs L., Deno S. The relationship between curriculum-based mastery measures and standardized achievement tests in reading (Research Report No. 57). 1981;University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities, Minneapolis.
7. Fuchs L.S., Deno S.L. Paradigmatic distinctions between instructionally relevant measurement models. Exceptional Children. 57:1991;488-500.
8. Fuchs L.S., Deno S.L. Effects of curriculum within curriculum-based measurement. Exceptional Children. 58:1992;232-242.
9. Fuchs L.S., Deno S.L. Must instructionally useful performance assessment be based in the curriculum? Exceptional Children. 61:1994;15-24.
10. Fuchs L.S., Fuchs D. Identifying a measure for monitoring student reading progress. School Psychology Review. 21:1992;45-48.
11. Fuchs L., Fuchs D., Deno S.L. Reliability and validity of curriculum-based informal reading inventories (Research Report No. 59). 1981;University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities, Minneapolis.
12. Fuchs L.S., Fuchs D., Hamlett C.L., Ferguson C. Effects of expert system consultation within curriculum-based measurement, using a reading maze task. Exceptional Children. 58:1992;436-450.
13. Fuchs L.S., Fuchs D., Hamlett C.L., Walz L., Germann G. Formative evaluation of academic progress. How much growth can we expect? School Psychology Review. 22:1993;27-48.
14. Giddings L.R. Literature-based reading instruction. An analysis Reading Research and Instruction. 31:1992;18-30.
15. Good R.H., Shinn M.R. Forecasting accuracy of slope estimates for reading curriculum-based measurement. Empirical evidence Behavioral Assessment. 12:1990;179-193.
16. Goodman K.S. I didn't found whole language. The Reading Teacher. 46:1992;188-199.
17. Hintze J.M., Shapiro E.S. Curriculum-based measurement and literature-based reading. Is curriculum-based measurement meeting the needs of changing reading curricula? Journal of School Psychology. 35:1997;351-357.
18. Hintze J.M., Shapiro E.S., Lutz J.G. The effects of curriculum on the sensitivity of curriculum-based measurement in reading. Journal of Special Education. 28:1994;188-202.
19. Jenkins J.R., Jewell M. Examining the validity of two measures for formative teaching. Reading aloud and maze Exceptional Children. 59:1993;421-432.
20. Shapiro E.S. Academic skills problems. Direct assessment and intervention:1996;Guilford Press, New York. (2nd ed.).
21. Shinn M.R. Curriculum-based measurement. Assessing special children:1989;Guilford Press, New York.
22. Shinn M.R., Good R.J. III, Knutson N., Tilly W.D. III, Collins V.L. Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency. A confirmatory analysis of its relation to reading School Psychology Review. 21:1992;459-479.
23. Shinn M.R., Good R.H., Stein S. Summarizing trend in student achievement. A comparison of methods School Psychology Review. 18:1989;356-370.
24. Shinn M.R., McConnell S. Improving general education instruction. Relevance to school psychologists School Psychology Review. 23:1994;351-371.
25. Simner M.L. A position paper on beginning reading instruction in Canadian schools. Canadian Journal of School Psychology. 9:1992;96-99.
26. Stahl S.A., Kuhn M.R. Does whole language or instruction matched to learning styles help children learn to read? School Psychology Review. 24:1995;393-404.
27. Vellutino F.R. Introduction to three studies on reading acquisition. Convergent findings on theoretical foundations of code-oriented versus whole-language approaches to reading instruction Journal of Educational Psychology. 83:1991;437-443.
28. Zarrillo J. Teachers' interpretations of literature-based reading. The Reading Teacher. 44:1989;22-29.