Phylogenetic implications of glires (Eurymylidae, mimotonidae, rodentia, lagomorpha) incisor enamel microstructure

Zoosystematics and Evolution

Volumn 75, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 257-273

  Martin, Thomas ^a  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Enamel microstructure; Eurymylidae; Glires; Incisors; Lagomorpha; Mimotonidae; Mixodontia; Rodentia

Indexed keywords

EID: 0007023898     PISSN: 14351935     EISSN: 18600743     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mmnz.19990750207     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Averianov A. O. & Erfurt, J. (1996): Artiodactyla from the early Eocene of southern Kazakhstan.-Hallesches Jahrbuch für Geowissenschaften 18: 171-178.
2. Boyde A. 1978. Development of the structure of the enamel of the incisor teeth in the three classical subordinal groups of the Rodentia. Zti Butler, I? M. & Josey, K. A. (eds.). Development, Function and Evolution of Teeth, pp. 43-58. Academic Press. London, New York, San Francisco.
3. Dashzeveg. D. & Russell. D. E. 1988. Palaeocene and Eocene Mixodontia (Mammalia. Glires) of Mongolia and China.-Palaeontology 31: 129-164.
4. Dashzcveg. D. Hartenberger, J.-L., Martin, T. & Legendre, S. 1998. A peculiar minute glires (Mammalia) from the early Eocene of Mongolia. In Beard, K. C. & Dawson, M. R. (eds.). Dawn of thc age of mammals in Asia.-Bulletin of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History 34 194-209.
5. Flynn. L. J. Russell, D. E. & Dashzeveg. D. 1987. New Glires (Mammalia) from the early Eocene of the People's Republic of Mongolia. Part 11. Incisor morphology and enamel microstructure.-Proceedings of thc Koninklijke Nederlandse Akadernie van Wetenschappen B 90: 143-154.
6. Koenigswald, W. v. 1980. Schmelzmuster und Morphologie in den Molaren der Arvicolidae (Rodentia).-Abhandlungen der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft 539: 1-129.
7. Koenigswald, W. v.1988. Enamel modification in enlarged front teeth among mammals and the various possible reinforcements of the enamel. In Russell. D. E., Santoro, J.-P. & Sigogneau-Russell, D. (eds.). Teeth Revisited.-MCmoires du Museum national d’Histoire naturelle C 53: 148-165.
8. Koenigswald, W. v.1994. Differenzierungen im Zahnschmelz der Marsupialia im Vergleich zu den Verhaltnissen bei den Placentalia (Mammalia).-Berliner Geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen E 13: 45-81.
9. Koenigswald, W. v.1995. Lagomorpha versus Rodentia. The number of layers in incisor enamels.-Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Palaontologie, Monatshefte 1995: 605-613.
10. Koenigswald, W. v.1996. Die Zahl der Schmelzschichten in den Inzisiven bei den Lagomorpha und ihre systematische Bedeutung.-Bonner Zoologische Beitrage (J. Niethammer Festschrift) 46: 33-57
11. Koenigswald W. v., Rensberger, J. M. & Ptretzschner, H. U. 1987. Changes in the tooth enamel of early Paleocene Mammals allowing increased diet diversity.-Nature 328: 150-152.
12. Koenigswald, W. v. & Sander, P. M. 1997. Glossary of terms used for enamel microstructures. In Koenigswald, W. v. & Sander, P. M. (eds.). Tooth enamel microstructure, pp. 267-280. Balkema, Rotterdam.
13. Korvenkontio, V. A. 1934. Mikroskopische Untersuchungen an Nagerincisiven, unter Hinweis auf die Schmelzstruktur der Backenziihne.-Annales Zoologici Societatis Zoolo-gicae-Botanicae Fennica Vanamo 2: 1-274.
14. Li, C. K. & Ting, S. 1985. Possible phylogenetic relationship of Asiatic eurymylids and rodents, with comments on mimotonids. In Luckett, W. I? & Hartenberger, J.-L. (eds.). Evolutionary Relationships Among Rodents, pp. 35-58, Plenum Press, New York.
15. Li, C. K. & Ting, S.1993. New cranial and postcranial evidence for the affinities of the eurymylids (Rodentia) and mimotonids (La-gomorpha). In Szalay, F. S., Novacek, M. J. & McKenna, M. C. (eds.). Mammal Phylogeny. Mesozoic Differentiation, Multiluberculates, Monotremes, Early Therians, and Marsupials, pp. 151-158, Springer, Berlin, New York.
16. Luckett, W. P. 1993. An ontogenetic assessment of dental ho-niologies in therian mammals. In Szalay, E S., Novacek, M. J. & McKenna, M. C. (eds.). Mammal Phylogeny. Mesozoic Differentiation, Mutituberculates, Monotremes, Early Therians, and Marsupials, pp. 182-204, Springer, Berlin. New York.
17. Martin, T. 1992. Schmelzmikrostruktur in den Inzisiven alt-und neuweltlicher hystricognather Nagetiere. Palaeovertebrata, MCmoire extraordinaire: 1-168.
18. Martin, T.1993. Early rodent incisor enamel evolution: Phylogenetic implications.-Journal of Mammalian Evolution 1: 227-253.
19. Martin, T.1995. Incisor enamel microstructure and phylogenetic interrelationships of Pedetidae and Ctenodactyloidea.-Berliner Geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen E 16: 693-707.
20. Martin, T.1997. Incisor enamel microstructure and systematics in rodents. In Koenigswald, w. v. & Sander, I? M. (cds.). Tooth enamel microstructure, pp. 163-175. Balkema, Rotterdam.
21. Martin, T.1999a. Dryolestidae (Dryolestoidea, Mammalia) aus dern Oberen Jura von Portugal.-Abhandlungen der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft (in press).
22. Martin, T.l999b. Evolution of incisor enamel microstructure in The-ridomyidae (Rodentia).-Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 19 (3) (in press).
23. Meng, J. & Wyss, A. R. 1994. Enamel microstructure of Tri-hosphenomys (Mammalia, Glires): characters analysis and systematic implications.-Journal of Mammalian Evolution 2: 185-203.
24. Meng, J., Wyss. A. R., Dawson, M. R. & Zhai, R. 1994. Primitive fossil rodent from Inner Mongolia and its implications for mammalian phylogeny.-Nature 37R 134-136.
25. Moss-Salentijn, L., Moss, M. L. & Yuan, M. S. 1997. The ontogeny of mammalian enamel. In Koenigswald, W. v. & Sander, P. M. (eds.). Tooth enamel microstructure, pp. 5-30. Balkema, Rotterdam.
26. Pfretzschner, H. U. 1988. Structural reinforcement and crack propagation in enamel. In Russell. D. E., Santoro. J.-P. & Sigogneau-Russell, D. (eds.). Teeth Revisited.-MCmoires du Museum national d’Histoire naturelle C 53: 133-143.
27. Pfretzschner, H. U.1994. Biomechanik dcr Schmelzmikrostruktur in den Backenzahnen von Grolhaugern.-Palaeontographica A 234: 1-88.
28. Sahni, A. & Koenigswald, W. v. 1997. The enamel structure of some fossil and recent whales from the Indian subcontinent. In Koenigswald, W. v. & Sander, P M. (eds.). Tooth enamel microstructure, pp. 177-191. Balkema, Rotterdam.
29. Sander, P. M. 1997. Non-mammalian synapsid enamel and the origin of mammalian enamel prisms: The bottom-up perspective. In Koenigswald, W. v. & Sander, P. M. (eds.). Tooth enamel microstructure, pp. 41-62. Balkema, Rotterdam.
30. Wahlert, J. H. 1968. Variability of rodent incisor enamel as viewed in thin section, and the microstructure of the enamel in fossil and Recent rodent groups.-Breviora of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 309: 1-18.
31. Wahlert, J. H. 1989. The three types of incisor enamel in rodents. III Black, C. C. & Dawson, M. R. (eds.). Papers on Fossil Rodents in Honour of Albert Elmer Wood.-Science Series, Los Angeles County Museum 33: 7-16.
32. Wood, C. B. & Stern, D. N. 1997. The earliest prisms in mammalian and reptilian enamel. In Koenigswald. W. v. & Sander, P. M. (eds). Tooth enamel microstructure, pp. 63-83. Balkema, Rotterdam.