Reconcilable differences: Archivists, catalogers, and manuscript materials

Technical Services Quarterly

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 35-43

  Demeule, Marah ^a   Gregory, Gwen ^a  

^a NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Archival cataloging; Cataloging; Manuscript collections; New mexico state university library; OCLC; Rio grande historical collections; VTLS

Indexed keywords

EID: 0007017672     PISSN: 07317131     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J124v16n04_03     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Allchin, Barbara M.1995. ''Subject Access to Archival Collections: A Comparison of Online Finding Aids and MARC Records for Manuscript Collections in the Southern Historical Collection.'' Master's thesis, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
2. Archives and Authority Control: Proceedings of a Seminar Sponsored by the Smithsonian Institution, October 27, 1987. 1989. Pittsburgh, PA: Archives and Museum Informatics.
3. Bibliographic Formats and Standards, 2nd ed. 1996. Dublin, OH: OCLC, 1996.
4. Evans, Max J. and Lisa B.Weber. 1985. MARC for Archives and Manuscripts: A Compendium of Practice. Madison, WI: State Historical Society of Wisconsin.
5. Gorman, Michael, and Paul W. Winkler, eds.1988. Anglo-American Cataloging Rules, 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
6. Hensen, Steven L.1989. Archives, Personal Papers, andManuscripts: A Cataloging Manual for Archival Repositories, Historical Societies, andManuscript Libraries, 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: Society of American Archivists.
7. Library of Congress Rule Interpretations. 1990. Washington, DC: Cataloging Distribution Service, Library of Congress.
8. Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division. 1995. Thesaurus for Graphic Materials. Washington, DC: Library of Congress, Cataloging Distribution Service.
9. MARC Home Page. 1998. Library of Congress, Network Development and MARC Standards Office (available via the World Wide Web at http://lcweb.loc.gov/marc/).
10. Miller, Fredric. 1997. ''Archival Description,''The Reference Librarian No. 56: 55-66.
11. Smiraglia, Richard. 1990. Describing Archival Materials: The Use of the MARC AMC Format. New York, NY: The Haworth Press, Inc.
12. Stielow, Frederick J., Rebecca Hankins and Veola Jones. 1995. ''From Managerial Theory andWorksheets to PracticalMARC AMC; or, Dancing with the Dinosaur at the Amistad,''The American Archivist, 58: 464-74.
13. Walch, Victoria Irons. 1994. Standards for Archival Description: A Handbook. Chicago, IL: Society of American Archivists.
14. Wilkerson, Peter. 1998. Multi-level description: One strategy for implementation with personal papers. (Draft copy available via World Wide Web at http://www. schistory.org/multilevel.html).
15. Yakel, Elizabeth. 1992. ''Pushing MARC AMC to Its Limits: The Vatican Archives Project,''The American Archivist55: 192-200.