90° pulse width calibrations: How to read a pulse width array

Concepts in Magnetic Resonance

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 165-180

  Keifer, Paul A ^{a,b,c,d,e,f,g}  

^a Varian Inc   (United States)

^b Varian Instruments   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e Eppley Institute for Cancer Research   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^g STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Calibrations; NMR; Nutation experiments; Pulse widths; Pulses; Radiation damping; rf

Indexed keywords

EID: 0007015438     PISSN: 10437347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0534(1999)11:3<165::AID-CMR4>3.0.CO;2-D     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Santos H, Turner DL, Xavier AV. A difference method for the reduction of "auto" peaks in autocorrelation spectra. J Magn Reson 1983; 55: 463-467.
2. Turner DL. Phase cycling. In: Grant DM, Harris RK, editors. Encyclopedia of nuclear magnetic resonance. West Sussex, England: Wiley; 1996. p 3585-3592.
3. Bain AD. Radiofrequency pulses: Response of nuclear spins. In: Grant DM, Harris RK, editors. Encyclopedia of nuclear magnetic resonance. West Sussex, England: Wiley; 1996. p 3944-3949.
4. Fukushima E, Roeder SBW. Experimental pulse NMR: A nuts and bolts approach. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1981. 539 p.
5. Derome AE. Modern NMR techniques for chemistry research. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1987. p. 56-58.
6. Levy GC, Bailey JT, Wright DA. A sensitive NMR thermometer for multinuclei FT NMR. J Magn Reson 1980; 37:353-356.
7. Traficante DD. Maximum power transfer and percent efficiency: Which is more important? Concepts Magn Reson 1997; 9:13-16.
8. Bax A. A simple method for the calibration of the decoupler radiofrequency field strength. J Magn Reson 1983; 52:76-80.
9. Doddrell DM, Pegg DT, Bendall MR. Distortionless enhancement of NMR signals by polarization transfer. J Magn Reson 1982; 48:323-327.
10. Ernst RR. Nuclear magnetic double resonance with an incoherent radio-frequency field. J Chem Phys 1966; 45:3845-3861.
11. Reynolds WF, McLean S, Tay L-L, Yu M, Enriquez RG, Estwick DM, Pascoe KO. Comparison of 13C resolution and sensitivity of HSQC and HMQC sequences and application of HSQC-based sequences to the total 1H and 13C spectral assignment of clionasterol. Magn Reson Chem 1997; 35:455-462.
12. Otting G, Wuethrich K. Efficient purging scheme for proton-detected heteronuclear two-dimensional NMR. J Magn Reson 1988; 76:569-574.
13. Mehr KG. Varian NMR Instruments (personal communication); 1998.
14. Foo TKF, Hayes CE, Kang YW. Reduction of RF penetration effects in high field imaging. Magn Reson Med 1992; 23:287-301.
15. Wesener JR, Guenther H. Steady state pulse calibration. J Magn Reson 1985; 62:158-162.
16. Mao X, Wu D, Ye C. Radiation damping effects on NMR signal intensities. Chem Phys Lett 1993; 204:123-127.
17. Mao X, Ye C. Line shapes of strongly radiationdamped nuclear magnetic resonance signals. J Chem Phys 1993; 99:7455-7462.
18. Mao X, Guo J, Ye C. Competition between radiation damping and transverse relaxation effects on NMR signal intensities. Chem Phys Lett 1994; 218:249-253.
19. Abergel D, Lallemand J-Y. Some microscopic aspects of radiation damping in NMR. J Magn Reson 1994; 110:45-51.
20. Mao X-A, Ye C-H. Understanding radiation damping in a simple way. Concepts Magn Reson 1997; 9:173-187.
21. Wu D, Johnson CS Jr. Radiation-damping effects on relaxation-time measurements by the inversion-recovery method. J Magn Reson 1994; 110:113-117.
22. Mao X, Guo J, Ye C. Radiation damping effects on transverse relaxation time measurements. Chem Phys Lett 1994; 227:65-68.
23. Mao X, Guo J, Ye C. Radiation damping effects on spin-lattice relaxation time measurements. Chem Phys Lett 1994; 222:417-421.
24. Barjat H, Chadwick GP, Morris GA, Swanson AG. The behavior of multiplet signals under "radiation damping" conditions. I. Classical effects. J Magn Reson 1995; 117:109-112.
25. Mao X, Chen J. Radiation damping effects in solvent preirradiation experiments in NMR. Chem Phys 1996; 202:357-366.
26. Chen J-H, Mao X-A, Ye C-H. Intensity jumping and beating in inversion-recovery experiments of water due to radiation damping. J Magn Reson 1997; 124:490-494.
27. Warren WS, Hammes SL, Bates JL. Dynamics of radiation damping in nuclear magnetic resonance. J Chem Phys 1989; 91:5895-5904.
28. Warren WS, Mayr SM. Shaped pulses. In: Grant DM, Harris RK, editors. Encyclopedia of nuclear magnetic resonance. West Sussex, England: Wiley; 1996. p 4275-4283.
29. Bendall MR. Broadband and narrow-band spin decoupling using adiabatic spin flips. J Magn Reson A 1995; 112:126-129.
30. Silver MS, Joseph RI, Hoult DI. Highly selective pi/2 and pi pulse generation. J Magn Reson 1984; 59:347-351.
31. Levitt MH. Composite pulses. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 1986; 18:61-122.
32. Bax A. A spatially selective composite 90-degree radiofrequency pulse. J Magn Reson 1985; 65:142-145.
33. Smallcombe SH, Patt SL, Keifer PA. WET solvent suppression and its applications to LC NMR and high-resolution NMR spectroscopy. J Magn Reson A 1995; 117:295-303.
34. Vaughn JB, Kuhns PL. How to write specifications, do demonstrations, and evaluate NMR spectrometers I: Application tests and evaluations. Spectroscopy 1995; 10:36-40.
35. Vaughn JB, Kuhns PL. How to write specifications, do demonstrations, and evaluate NMR spectrometers II: Hardware tests and evaluation. Spectroscopy 1995; 10:36-40.