Global random-field spin-glass phase diagrams in two and three dimensions

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 426-431

  Migliorini, Gabriele ^a   Berker, A Nihat ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0006951321     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.426     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Y. Imry and S.-k. Ma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 1399 (1975).
2. S. F. Edwards and P. W. Anderson, J. Phys. F 5, 965 (1975).
3. C. de Dominicis, H. Orland, and T. Temesvari, J. Phys. I 5, 987 (1995).
4. A. J. Bray and M. A. Moore, J. Phys. C 17, L613 (1984).
5. E. J. Hartford and S. R. McKay, J. Appl. Phys. 70, 6068 (1991).
6. G. Toulouse, Commun. Phys. 2, 115 (1977).
7. D. Andelman and A. N. Berker, Phys. Rev. B 29, 2630 (1984).
8. S. R. McKay and A. N. Berker, J. Appl. Phys. 64, 5785 (1988).
9. A. Falicov, A. N. Berker, and S. R. McKay, Phys. Rev. B 51, 8266 (1995).
10. A. Falicov and A. N. Berker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4380 (1996).
11. A. A. Migdal, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 69, 1457 (1975) [Sov. Phys. JETP 42, 743 (1976)].
12. L. P. Kadanoff, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 100, 359 (1976).
13. A. N. Berker and S. Ostlund, J. Phys. C 12, 4961 (1979).
14. M. S. Cao and J. Machta, Phys. Rev. B 48, 3177 (1993).
15. The terminology of “reentrant” spin-glass phase used in the literature is, strictly speaking, a misnomer, since on each side of the ferromagnetic phase, the high-temperature (paramagnetic) and low-temperature (spin-glass) phases are different, themselves being separated by a phase transition elsewhere in the global phase diagram, unlike the case of the true reentrant phases [P. Cladis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 48 (1975).
16. P. CladisMol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 165, 85 (1988)].
17. However, reentrant correlations, that increase but do eventually weaken as temperature is decreased, because of frustration effects, have been shown [S. R. McKay, A. N. Berker, and S. Kirkpatrick, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 767 (1982)] to be essential to the chaotic rescaling behavior characteristic of the spin-glass phase.
18. H. Nishimori, Prog. Theor. Phys. 66, 1169 (1981).
19. P. Le Doussal and A. Georges, Yale University Report No. YCTP-P1-88 (1988).
20. P. Le Doussal and A. B. Harris, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 625 (1988).
21. B. Nienhuis and M. Nauenberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 477 (1975).
22. A. N. Berker, J. Appl. Phys. 70, 5941 (1991).
23. A. N. Berker, Physica A 194, 72 (1993).
24. A. J. Bray and M. A. Moore, J. Phys. C 18, L927 (1985).
25. A. N. Berker and S. R. McKay, Phys. Rev. B 33, 4712 (1986).
26. We qualified this phenomenon (Ref. 11), where along a single critical line, segmentwise uniform critical exponents change from one value to another at a multicritical point, as the “strong” violation of universality, to distinguish it from the previously known phenomenon of continuously varying critical exponents along a critical line, as occurs in certain models in (Formula presented) [e.g., R. J. Baxter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 832 (1971)].