Huitzilopochtli's conquest: Aztec ideology in the archaeological record

Cambridge Archaeological Journal

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 3-13

  Brumfiel, Elizabeth M ^a  

^a ALBION COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0006835973     PISSN: 09597743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/s095977430000127x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (50)

1. Abercrombie, N., S. Hill & B.S. Turner, 1980. The Dominant Ideology Thesis. London: George Allen & Unwin.
2. Althusser, L., 1971. Ideology and ideological state apparatuses, in Lenin and Philosophy, trans. B. Brewster. New York (NY): Monthly Review Press, 127-86.
3. Anawalt, P.R., 1992. A comparative analysis of the costumes and accoutrements of the Codex Mendoza, in The Codex Mendoza, vol. I, by F.F. Berdan & P.R. Anawalt. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press, 103-50.
4. Arana, R.M. & G. Cepeda, 1967. Rescate arqueológico en la Ciudad de Mexico. INAH Boletín 30, 3-9.
5. Armillas, P., 1964. Northern Mesoamerica, in Prehistoric Man in the New World, eds. J.D. Jennings & E. Norbeck. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press, 291-329.
6. Berdan, F.F., 1982. The Aztecs of Central Mexico. New York (NY): Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
7. Blanton, R.E., G.M. Feinman, S.A. Kowalewski & P.N. Peregrine, 1996. A dual-processual theory for the evolution of Mesoamerican civilization. Current Anthropology 37, 1-14.
8. Boone, E.H. (ed.), 1987. The Aztec Templo Mayor. Washington (DC): Dumbarton Oaks.
9. Brumfiel, E.M., 1983. Aztec state making: ecology, structure, and the origin of the state. American Anthropologist 85, 261-84.
10. Brumfiel, E.M., 1987. Élite and utilitarian crafts in the Aztec state, in Specialization, Exchange, and Complex Societies, eds. E.M. Brumfiel & T.K. Earle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 102-18.
11. Brumfiel, E.M., 1994a. Factional competition and political development in the New World: an introduction, in Factional Competition and Political Development in the New World, eds. E.M. Brumfiel & J.W. Fox. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3-13.
12. Brumfiel, E.M., 1994b. Three incidents of resistance and class warfare in Aztec ethnohistory. Paper presented at the 93rd Annual Meeting, American Anthropological Association, Atlanta.
13. Brumfiel, E.M., 1996. Figurines and the Aztec state: testing the effectiveness of ideological domination, in Gender in Archaeology: Research in Gender and Practice, ed. R.P. Wright. Philadelphia (PA): University of Pennsylvania Press, 143-66.
14. Caso, A., 1958. The Aztecs: People of the Sun. Norman (OK): University of Oklahoma Press.
15. Codex Mendoza, 1990. The Codex Mendoza, eds. F.F. Berdan & P.R. Anawalt. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press. 4 vols.
16. Conrad, G.W. & A.A. Demarest, 1984. Religion and Empire: the Dynamics of Aztec and lnca Expansionism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Cook, C., 1950. Figurillas de barro de Santiago Tlatelolco. Memorias de la Academia Mexicana de la Historia (Tlatelolco a Través de los Tiempos) 9(1), 93-100.
18. DeMarrais, E., L.J. Castillo & T. Earle, 1996. Ideology, materialization and power strategies. Current Anthropology 37, 15-31.
19. Díaz del Castillo, B., 1956. The Discovery and Conquest of Mexico, trans. A.P. Maudslay. New York (NY): Noonday Press.
20. Durán, D., 1967. Historia de las Indias de Nueva España. Mexico City: Porrúa.
21. Durán, D., 1971. Book of the Gods and Rites and the Aztec Calendar, trans. F. Horcasitas & D. Heyden. Norman (OK): University of Oklahoma Press.
22. Ferguson, L., 1991. Struggling with pots in colonial South Carolina, in The Archaeology of Inequality, eds. R.H. McGuire & R. Paynter. Oxford: Blackwell, 28-39.
23. Fligstein, N., 1994. The cultural construction of political action: the case of the European Community's Single Market Program. Working paper. Harvard University Center for European Studies.
24. Foucault, M., 1977. Discipline and Punish, trans. A. Sheridan. New York (NY): Pantheon.
25. Gilman, A., 1989. Marxism in American archaeology, in Archaeological Thought in America, ed. C.C. Lamberg-Karlovsky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 63-73.
26. Gilman, A., 1996. Comments on 'Ideology, materialization, and power strategies'. Current Anthropology 37, 56-7.
27. Gingerich, W., 1988. Chipahuacanemiliztli, 'The purified life,' in the discourses of Book VI, Florentine Codex, in Josserand & Dakin (eds.), 517-44.
28. Hicks, F., 1994. The middle class of ancient Mexico. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting, American Society for Ethnohistory, Tempe.
29. Johnson, M., 1997. The medieval castle and the fashioning of agency. Paper presented at the 62nd annual meeting, Society for American Archaeology. Nashville.
30. Josserand, J.K. & K. Dakin (eds.), 1988. Smoke and Mist: Mesoamerican Studies in Memory of Thelma D. Sullivan. (British Archaeological Reports, International Series 402.) Oxford: BAR.
31. Kelly, R.C., 1993. Constructing Inequality: the Fabrication of a Hierarchy of Virtue among the Etoro. Ann Arbor (MI): The University of Michigan Press.
32. Klein, C.F., 1987. The ideology of autosacrifice at the Templo Mayor, in Boone (ed.), 293-370.
33. Klein, C.F., 1988. Rethinking Cihuacoatl: Aztec political imagery of the conquered woman, in Josserand & Dakin (eds.), 237-77.
34. Lewis, M.E., 1990. Sanctioned Violence in Early China. Albany (NY): State University Press of New York.
35. Matos, M.E., 1988. The Great Temple of the Aztecs. London: Thames and Hudson.
36. Molina Montes, A.F., 1987. Templo Mayor architecture: so what's new?, in Boone (ed.), 97-107.
37. Miller, D. & C. Tilley (eds.), 1984. Ideology, Power and Prehistory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Nicholson H.B. with E.Q. Keber, 1983. Art of Aztec Mexico. Washington (DC): National Gallery of Art.
39. Ortner, S.B., 1984. Theory in anthropology since the sixties. Comparative Studies in Society and History 26, 126-66.
40. Otis Charlton, C.L., 1994. Plebeians and patricians: contrasting patterns of production and distribution in the Aztec figurine and lapidary industries, in Economies and Polities in the Aztec Realm, eds. M.G. Hodge & M.E. Smith. Albany (NY): State University of New York at Albany, Institute for Mesoamerican Studies, 195-219.
41. Parsons, M.H., 1972. Aztec figurines from the Teotihucán Valley, Mexico, Miscellaneous Studies in Mexican Prehistory, by M.W. Spence, J.R. Parsons & M.H. Parsons. (Anthropological Papers 45.) Ann Arbor (MI): Museum of Anthropologyy, University of Michigan, 81-117.
42. Pasztory, E., 1983. Aztec Art. New York (NY): Abrams.
43. Sahagún, B. de, 1950-82. Florentine Codex, trans. C.E. Dibble & A.J.O. Anderson. Santa Fe (NM): The School of American Research and the University of Utah.
44. Shanks, M. & C. Tilley, 1982. Ideology, symbolic power and ritual communication: a reinterpretation of Neolithic mortuary practices, in Symbolic and Structural Archaeology, ed. I. Hodder. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 129-54.
45. Snow, D.A., E.B. Rochford Jr, S.K. Worden & R.D. Benford, 1986. Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review 51, 464-81.
46. Thompson, J.B., 1990. Ideology and Modern Culture. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press.
47. Townsend, R.F., 1979. State and Cosmos in the Art of Tenochtitlan. (Studies in Pre-Columbian Art & Cosmology 20.) Washington (DC): Dumbarton Oaks.
48. Tuberville, A.S., 1929. Heresies and the inquisition in the Middle Ages, c. 1000-1305, in Cambridge Medieval History, vol. 6, eds. J.R. Panner, C.W. Previté-Orton & Z.N. Brooke. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 699-726.
49. Umberger, E., 1996. Art and imperial strategy in Tenochtitlan, in Aztec Imperial Strategies, by F.F. Berdan et al. Washington (DC): Dumbarton Oaks, 85-106.
50. Wolf, E.R., 1969. Peasant Wars of the Twentieth Century. New York (NY): Harper & Row.