A C++ Platform for the Evolution of Trade Networks

Computational Economics

Volumn 14, Issue 1-2, 1999, Pages 109-134

  Mcfadzean, David ^a   Tesfatsion, Leigh ^b  

^a Kumo Software Corporation   (Canada)

^b IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Agent based computational economics; Artificial life; C++ platform; Endogenous interactions; Evolutionary game; Partner matching; Trade networks

Indexed keywords

EID: 0006462723     PISSN: 09277099     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/a:1008695528483     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Ashlock, D., Smucker, M.D., Stanley, E.A. and Tesfatsion, L. (1996). Preferential partner selection in an evolutionary study of prisoner's dilemma. BioSystems, 37, 99-125.
2. Duong, D.V. (1996). Symbolic interactionist modeling: The coevolution of symbols and institutions. In A. Meystel (ed.), Intelligent Systems: A Semiotic Perspective, 349-354. National Institute for Standards and Technology.
3. Epstein, J. and Axtell, R. (1996). Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up. MIT Press.
4. Friedman, D. (1991). Evolutionary games in economics. Econometrica, 59, 637-666.
5. Gale, D. and Shapley, L. (1962). College admissions and the stability of marriage. American Mathematical Monthly, 69, 9-15.
6. Goldberg, D. (1989). Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
7. Kirman, A. (1992). Whom or what does the representative individual represent? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6 (Spring), 117-136.
8. Levy, S. (1992). Artificial Life: A Report from the Frontier where Computers Meet Biology.Pantheon Books, N.Y.
9. Lippman, S.B. (1990). C++ Primer. Second edition, Addison-Wesley.
10. McFadzean, D. (1995). SimBioSys: A Class Framework for Evolutionary Simulations. Master's Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
11. Nelson, R. (1995). Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change. Journal of Economic Literature, 33, 48-90.
12. Roth, A. and Sotomayor, M.A.O. (1990). Two-Sided Matching: A Study in Game-Theoretic Modeling and Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
13. Stanley, E.A., Ashlock, D. and Tesfatsion, L. (1994). Iterated prisoner's dilemma with choice and refusal of partners. In C. Langton (ed.), Artificial Life III, 131-175. Proceedings Volume 17, Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, Addison Wesley.
14. Tesfatsion, L. (1979). Direct updating of intertemporal criterion functions for a class of adaptive control problems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-9, 143-151.
15. Tesfatsion, L. (1997a). A trade network game with endogenous partner selection. ISU Economic Report No. 36, April 1995, abbreviated version appears in Amman, H. et al. (eds.), Computational Approaches to Economic Problems, pp. 249-269. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
16. Tesfatsion, L. (1997b). How economists can get alife. In W. Brian Arthur, Steven Durlauf and David Lane (eds.), The Economy as an Evolving Complex System, II, 533-564. Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, Proceedings Volume XXVII, Addison-Wesley.
17. Vriend, N. (1995). Self-organization of markets: An example of a computational approach. Computational Economics, 8, 205-231.
18. Witt, U. (1993). Evolutionary Economics. Edward Elgar, London.