Lighting and sustained performance

Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 116-130

  Eklund, Neil H ^a   Boyce, Peter R ^a   Simpson, S Noel ^a  

^a RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0006367132     PISSN: 00994480     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00994480.2000.10748487     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. WestonH.C. 1935. The relation between illumination and industrial efficiency:The effect of size of work. Joint Report of the Industrial Health Research Board and the Illumination Research Committee. London. His Majesty's Stationary Office.
2. WestonH.C. 1945. The relation between illumination and industrial efficiency:The effect of brightness contrast. Industrial Health Research Board of the Medical Research Council, Report 87. London. His Majesty's Stationary Office.
3. BlackwellH.R. 1982. A comprehensive quantitative method for prediction of visual performance potential as a function of reference luminance. J of the IESNA 12:40–63.
4. ReaM.S. and OuelletteM.J. 1988. Relative visual performance using reaction times. Lighting Research and Technology 20:139.
5. JohnsonA. R., EklundN.H., and BoyceP.R. 1997. Pilot Study 1:Perception of three lighting installations by people experienced and naive in lighting, Lighting Research Center.
6. BoyceP.R. and EklundN.H. 1996. An evaluation of office lighting options. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America.
7. BaddeleyA. 1968. A three minute reasoning test based on grammatical transformation. Psychon Sci 10(no. 10):343.
8. CampbellS.S. and DawsonD. 1990. Enhancement of nighttime alertness and performance with bright ambient light. Physiology and Behavior 48:317.
9. BoyceP.R., BecksteadJ.R., EklundN.H., StrobelR.W., and ReaM.S. 1997. Lighting the graveyard shift:The influence of a daylight-simulating skylight on the task performance and mood of night-shift workers. Lighting Research and Technology 29:105.
10. WilliamsH. and LubinA. 1967. Speeded addition and sleep loss. Journal of Experimental Psychology 73(no 2):313.
11. HoldingD., LoebM., and BakerM. 1983. Effects and aftereffects of continuous noise and computation work on risk and effort choices. Motivation and Emotion 7(no. 4):331.
12. MorganB. and AlluisiE. 1972. Synthetic work:Methodology for assessment of human performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills 35:835.
13. WatsonD., ClarkL.A., and TellegenA. 1988. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect:The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54:1063.
14. ThayerR. 1986. Activation-Deactivation Adjective Checklist:Current overview and structural analysis. Psychological Reports 58:607.
15. EklundN.H., BoyceP.R., and JohnsonA.R. 1997. Pilot Study 2:Effects of three lighting installations on four-hour sustained task performance. Lighting Research Center.
16. FolkardS. and MonkT.H. 1985. Hours of Work. Chichester, U.K.:John Wiley and Sons.
17. VeitchJ.A. and NewshamG.R. 1998. Lighting quality and energy efficiency effects on task performance, mood, health, satisfaction, and comfort. J of the IESNA 27(no. 1):107–129.