The great figure drawing controversy: The integration of research and clinical practice

Journal of Personality Assessment

Volumn 69, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 488-496

  Riethmiller, Robert J ^a,b   Handler, Leonard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0006318101     PISSN: 00223891     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6903_4     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Acklin, M. ( 1995). Avoiding Rorschach dichotomies: Integrating Rorschach interpretation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 235-238.
2. Aronow, E., Reznikoff, M., & Moreland, K. C. (1995). The Rorschach: Projective technique or psychometric test? Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 213-228.
3. Bornstein, R. F., Bowers, K. S., & Bonner, S. (1996). Effects of induced mood states on objective and projective dependency scores. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67, 324-340.
4. Bornstein, R. F., Bowers, K. S., & Robinson, K. J. (1995). Differential relationships of objective and projective dependency scores to self-reports of interpersonal life events in college student subjects. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65, 255-269.
5. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
6. Handler, L., & Meyer, G. J. (in press). The importance of teaching and learning personality assessment. In L. Handler & M. Hilsenroth (Ed.), Teaching and learning personality assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
7. Handler, L., & Riethmiller, R. J. (in press). Teaching and learning the interpretation of graphic techniques. In L. Handler & M. Hilsenroth (Ed.), Teaching and learning personality assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc..
8. Joiner, T. E., Schmidt, K. L., & Barnett, J. (1966). Size, detail, and line heaviness in children's drawings as correlates of emotional distress: (More) negative evidence. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67, 127-141.
9. Kot, J., Handler, L., Toman, K., & Hilsenroth, M., (1994, April). The psychological assessment of homeless men. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality Assessment, Chicago.
10. Meyer, G. J. (1996). The Rorschach and MMPI: Toward a more scientifically differentiated understanding of cross-method assessment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67, 558-578.
11. McClelland, D., Koestner, R., & Weinberger, J. (1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 96, 690-702.
12. Moreland, K., Reznikoff, M., & Aronow, E., (1995). Integrating Rorschach interpretations by carefully placing more of your eggs in the content basket. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 239-242.
13. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw.
14. Ritzier, B. (1995). A response to Aronow, Reznikoff, and Moreland. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 229-234.
15. Shedler, J., Mayman, M., & Manis, M. (1993). The illusion of mental health. American Psychologist, 48, 1117-1131.
16. Spangler, W. D. (1992). Validity of questionnaire and TAT measures of need for achievement: Two meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 140-154.
17. Swensen, C. H. (1968). Empirical evaluations of human figure drawings. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 20-44.
18. Tharinger, D., & Stark, K., (1990). A qualitative versus quantitative approach to evaluating the Draw-A-Person and Kinetic Family Drawing: Study of mood- and anxiety-disordered children. Psychological Assessment, 2, 365-375.
19. Yama, M.F. (1990). The usefulness of human figure drawings as an index of overall adjustment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 54, 78-86.