Two water frog populations from western slovakia consisting of diploid females and diploid and triploid males of the hybridogenetic hybrid Rana esculenta (Anura, ranidae)

Zoosystematics and Evolution

Volumn 77, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 59-64

  Mikulíček, Peter ^a,b   Kotlík, Petr ^b,c  

^a Physics and Informatics   (Slovakia)

^b CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^c INSTITUTE OF ANIMAL PHYSIOLOGY AND GENETICS   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Ailopolyploidy; Allozyme analysis; Amphibia; Chromosomes; Diploid spermatozoa; Hybridization; Hybridogenesis; Rana esculentu; Rana i idibundu; Slovakia

Indexed keywords

EID: 0006308587     PISSN: 14351935     EISSN: 18600743     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mmnz.20010770110     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Berger, L. 1983. Western Palearctic water frogs (Amphibia. Ranidae): Systematics, genetics and population composition.-Experientia 39: 127-130.
2. Berger, L.1988. An all-hybrid water frog population persisting in agrocenoses of central Poland (Amphibia, Salientia, Rani-dae).-Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 140: 202-219.
3. Berger, L. & Gunther, R. 1988. Genetic composition and reproduction of water frog populations (Rnna kl. esetiknfn Synklepton) near nature reserve Serrahn, GDR.-Arch. Natschutz. Landsch.-forsch. 28: 265-280.
4. Berger, L., Uzzell, T., Hotz, H. 1988. Sex determination and sex ratios in western Palearctic water frogs: XX and XY female hybrids in the Pannonian Basin?-Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 140: 220-239.
5. Berger, L. & Berger, W. A. 1994. Persistance of all-hybrid water frog populations (Ram kl. esculenta) in northern Germany.-Genet. Pol. 35: 73-80.
6. Borkin, L. J., Zaune, I. A,, Pikulik, M. M. & Sokolova. T. M. 1986. Distribution and structure of the green frog complex in the USSR. In RoEek, Z. (ed.). Studies in Herpetology: pp. 675-678. Prague.
7. Dubois, A. & Gunther, R. 1982. Klepton and synklepton: Two new evolutionary systematic categories in zoology.-ZOOl. Jb. SySt. 109: 290-305.
8. Ebendal, T. 1979. Distribution, morphology and taxonomy of the Swedish green frogs (Rana esculentn complex).-Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berlin 55: 143-152.
9. Fog, K. 1994. Water frogs in Denmark: Populations types and biology.-Zool. Poloniae 39: 305-330.
10. Graf, J. D. & Polls Pelaz, M. 1989. Evolutionary genetics of the Rana esculenta complex. In Dawley, R. M., Bogart. J. I? (eds.). Evolution and ecology of unisexual vertebrates: pp. 289-301. New York State Museum Bulletin 466.
11. Gubinyi, A. 1992. Distribution of green frogs (Rann escrlen-tn complex, Anura: Ranidae) in Hungary. In Korsos. Z. Kiss, I. (eds.). Proc. Sixth Ord. Gen. Meet. S. H. E.: pp. 205-210. Budapest.
12. GubBnyi, A. & Creemers, R. 1994. Population structure of water frogs in a floodplain of the river Danube (Sziget-koz) in Hungary.-Zool. Poloniae 39: 441-445.
13. Gunther, R. 1975. Zum naturlichen Vorkomnien und zur Morphologie triploider Teichfrosche “Rana esczilenta”. L. in der DDR (Anura, Ranidae).-Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berlin 51: 146-158.
14. Gunther, R. 1977. Die ErythrozytengroRe als Kriterium zur Unter-scheidung diploider und triploider Teichfrosche, Rnna “esculenta” L. (Anura).-Biol. Zbl. 96: 457-466.
15. Gunther, R. 1983. Zur Populationsgenetik der mitteleuropaischen Wasserfrosche des Rana esculenta-Synkleptons (Anura. Ranidae).-Zool. Anz. 211: 43-54.
16. Gunther, R. 1990. Die Wasserfrosche Europas. Neue Brehm-Bucherei 600, A. Ziemsen Verlag, Wittenberg-Lutherstadt. 288 pp.
17. Gunther, R. 1991. Europaische Wasserfrosche (Anura, Ranidae) und biologisches Artkonzept.-Mitt. 2001.Mus. Berlin 67 39-53.
18. Günther, R. & Plotner, J. 1989-1990. Mating pattern in pure hybrid populations of water frogs, Rann kl. esciilenrcz (Anura, Ranidae).-Alytes 8: 90-98.
19. Gunther, R., Plotner, J. & Tetzlaff, I. 1991. Zu einigen Merk-malen der Wasserfrosche (Rann synkl. esculenra) des Donau-Deltas.-Salamandra 27: 249-265.
20. Heppich, S., Tunner, H. G. & Greilhuber, J. 1982. Premeiotic chromosome doubling after genome elimination during spermatogenesis of the species hybrid Rarzn esciikenra.-Theor. Appl. Genet. 61: 101-104.
21. Hotz, H. 1983. Genic diversity among water frog genomes inherited with and without recombination. PhD thesis. Philosophische Fakultat 11. Universitat Zurich. 136 pp.
22. Hotz. H. Beerli. P. & Spolsky. C. 1992. Mitochondria1 DNA reveals formation of nonhybrid frogs by natural matings between hemiclonal hybrids.-Mol. Biol. Evoi. 9: 610-620.
23. Kotlik. P. Rab. P. & Slova. K. 1997. Allozymes give evdence for interbreeding between the hemiclonal hybrid frog Rana escitlenia and its parental species R. ridibirndn and R. lessonae at a syntopic locality.-Gene Families and Isozymes Bulletin 30: 41-42.
24. Kotlik. P. & Sfilova. K. 1994. Syntopic occurence of three taxa of water frogs in Czech Republic.-Zool. Poloniae 39: 417-424.
25. Lada. G. A,. Borkin. L. J. & Vinogradov. A. E. 1995. Distribution. population systems and reproductive behavior of green frogs (hybridogenetic Rrrrin esciileizrn complex) in the central Chernozem territory of Russia.-Russian Journal of Herpetology 2: 46-57.
26. Mikulieek I & Orszaghovri Z. 1998. On the distribution of Amphibians in western Slovakia.-Acta Zool. Univ. Comenianae 42: 59-64.
27. Orr, H. A. 1997. Haldane's rule.-Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28: 195-218.
28. Plotner. J. & Klinkhardt. M. 1992. Invcstigations on the genetic structure and the morphometry of a pure hybrid population of Rana kl. escirlerita (Anura, Ranidae) in north Germany.-Zool. Anz. 229: 163-184.
29. Polls Pelaz. M. 1994. Modes of gametogenesis among klep-tons of the hybridogenetic water frog complex: an evolutionary synthesis.-Zool. Poloniae 39: 123-138.
30. Polls Pelaz, M. & Graf. J. D. 1988. Erythrocyte size as an indicator of ploidy level in Ram kl. escrileritn before and after the metamorphosis.-Alytes 7: 53-61
31. Rab P. & Roth P. 1988. Preparace chromozomu studeno-krevnich obratlovcd [Chromosome analyses of cold blooded vertebrates]. In BalEek. I?. Forejt. J. RubeS. J. (eds.). Metody anal9zp chromozomu [Methods of chromosome analyses]: pp. 115-124. Brno (Czechoslovak Biological Society Publishers).
32. Zool Rybacki M. 1994a. Water frogs (Ram esculenta complex) of the Bornholm Island, Denmark. Poloniae 39: 331-344.
33. Zool Rybacki M 1994b. Structure of water frog populations (Rana esculenm complex) of the Wolin Island, Poland.-Zool. Poloniae 39: 345-364.
34. Schempp. W. & Schmid, M. 1981. Chromosome banding in Amphibia. VI. BrdU-replication patterns in Anura and demonstration of XXiXY sex chromosomes in Rum escu-Imtci.-Chromosoma 83: 697-710.
35. Spasit-Boikovit. O..Krizmanik, I. & Vujoievic, M. 1999. Population composition and genetic variation of water frogs (Anura: Ranidae) from Yugoslavia.-Caryologia 52: 9-20.
36. Spatkova. V. 1981. Properties of green frogs from different types of populations in Czechoslovakia.-Acta Musei Moraviae. Scientiae naturales 66: 171-187.
37. Tunner. H. G. 1974. Die klonale Struktur einer Wasserfrosch-population.-Z. zool. Syst. Evo1ut.-forsch. 12: 309-314.
38. Tunner. H. G. & Dobrowsky, M. T. 1976. Zur morphologischen, serologischen und enzymologischen Differenzierung von Rana lessonae und der hybridogenetischen Ram esciilenfn aus dem Seewinkel und dem Neusiedlersee (Osterreich, Burgenland).-Zool. Anz. 197: 6-22.
39. Tunner. H. G. & Heppich, S. 1981. Premeiotic genome exclusion during oogenesis in the common edible frog, Rana rsciilenrr. -Naturwissenschaften 68: 207-208.
40. Tunner H. G. & Heppich-Tunner, S. 1992. A new population system of water frogs discovered in Hungary. In Korsos. Z., Kiss. I. (eds.). Proc. Sixth Ord. Gen. Meet. S. H. E.: pp. 453-460. Budapest.
41. Uzzell. T. & Berger. L. 1975. Electrophoretic phenotypes of Rnr7a ridihirndn, Rana lessonae, and their hybridogenetic associate. Ram escnlenm.-Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 127: 13-24.
42. Uzzell. T. & Hotz. H. 1979. Electrophoretic and morphological evidence for two forms of green frogs (Rana esculenta complex) in peninsular Italy (Amphibia, Salientia).-Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berlin 55: 13-27.
43. Zavadil. V. 1994. On the distribution of water frogs (Ram esciilenrn synklepton) in the Czech Republic with some notes from this territory.-Zool. Poloniae 39: 425-439.