Expectancy information as a moderator of the effects of hypnosis on memory

Contemporary Hypnosis

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 22-31

  Burgess, Cheryl A ^b   Kirsch, Irving ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Expectancy; False memory; Hypermnesia; Hypnosis; Memory

Indexed keywords

EID: 0006307642     PISSN: 09605290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ch.146     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Barnier AJ, McConkey KM. Reports of real and false memories: The relevance of hypnosis, hypnotizability, and context of memory test. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1992; 101: 521-527.
2. Bowers PG, Laurence JR, Hart D. A Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility: Revision and expansion of Form C. (ASIS-NAPS Document No. 04632). New York: National Auxiliary Publications Service, 1982.
3. Dinges DF, Whitehouse WG, Orne EC, Powell JW, Orne MT, Erdelyi MH. Evaluating hypnotic memory enhancement (hypermnesia and reminiscence) using multitrial forced recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 1992; 18: 1139-1147.
4. Green JP, Lynn SJ, Malinoski P. Hypnotic pseudomemories, prehypnotic expectancies, and the hidden observer phenomenon. Applied Cognitive Psychology, in press.
5. Hamond DC, Garver RB, Mutter CB, Crasilneck HB, Frischholz, E, Gravitz MA et al. Clinical Hypnosis and Memory: Guidelines for clinicians and for forensic hypnosis. Des Plaines, IL: American Society of Clinical Hypnosis Press, 1994.
6. Kirsch I. Response expectancy as a determinant of experience and behavior. American Psychologist 1985; 40: 1189-1202.
7. Kirsch I. Response expectancy theory and application: A decennial review. Applied and Preventive Psychology 1997; 6: 69-79.
8. Kirsch I. Expectancy, Experience, and Behavior. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, in press.
9. Laurence J-R, Perry CW. Hypnotically created memory among highly hypnotizable subjects. Science 1983; 222: 523-524.
10. Lynn SJ, Weekes JR, Milano M. Reality versus suggestion: Pseudomemory in hypnotized and simulating subjects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1989; 98: 137-144.
11. Lynn SJ, Milano M, Weekes JR. Hypnosis and pseudomemories: The effects of prehypnotic expectancies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1991; 60: 318-326.
12. Lynn SJ, Rhue JW, Myers BP, Weekes JR. Pseudomemory in hypnotized and simulating subjects. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1994; 42: 118-129.
13. McConkey KM. Opinions about hypnosis and self-hypnosis before and after hypnotic testing. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1986; 34: 311-319.
14. McConkey KM, Kinoshita S. The influence of hypnosis on memory after one day and one week. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1988; 97: 48-53.
15. McConkey KM, Labelle L, Bibb BC, Bryant RA. Hypnosis and suggested pseudomemory: The relevance of test context. Australian Journal of Psychology 1990; 42: 195-205.
16. Nogrady H, McConkey KM, Perry C. Enhancing visual memory: Trying hypnosis, trying imagination, and trying again. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1985; 94: 195-204.
17. Orne MT. The use and misuse of hypnosis in court. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1979; 27: 311-341.
18. Orne EC, Whitehouse WG, Dinges DF, Orne MT. Memory liabilities associated with hypnosis: Does low hypnotizability confer imunity? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1996; 44: 354-369.
19. Sheehan PW. Memory distortion in hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1988; 36: 296-311.
20. Sheehan PW, Tilden J. The consistency of occurrences of memory distortion following hypnotic induction. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1986; 34: 122-137.
21. Sheehan PW, Statham D, Jamieson GA. Pseudomemory effects and their relationship to level of susceptibility to hypnosis and state instruction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1991; 60: 130-137.
22. Sheehan PW, Green V, Truesdale P. Influence of rapport on hypnotically induced pseudomemory. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1992; 101: 690-700.
23. Shields IW, Knox J. Level of processing as a determinant of hypnotic hypermnesia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1986; 95: 358-364.
24. Snodgrass JG, Vanderwart M. A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 1980; 6: 174-215.
25. Spanos NP, Quigley CA, Gwynn MI, Glatt RL, Perlini AH. Hypnotic interrogation, pretrial preparation, and witness testimony during direct and cross-examination. Law and Human Behavior 1991; 15: 639-653.
26. Weekes JR, Lynn SJ, Green JP, Brentar JT. Pseudomemory in hypnotized and task-motivated subjects. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1992; 101: 356-360.
27. Weitzenhoffer AM, Hilgard E. Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale: Form C. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1962.
28. Whitehouse WG, Dinges DF, Orne EC, Orne MT. Hypnotic hypermnesia: Enhanced memory accessibility or report bias? Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1988; 97: 289-295.
29. Yuille JC, McEwan H. Use of hypnosis as an aid to eyewitness memory. Journal of Applied Psychology 1985; 70: 389-400.
30. Zamansky HS, Scharf B, Brightbill R. The effect of expectancy for hypnosis on prehypnotic performance. Journal of Personality 1964; 32: 236-248.