A comparison of loblolly pine plantation growth and yield models for inventory updating

Southern Journal of Applied Forestry

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 15-22

  Shortt, James S ^a   Burkhart, Harold E ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PINUS TAEDA;

EID: 0006249765     PISSN: 01484419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sjaf/20.1.15     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. AMATEIS, R.L., AND H.E. BURKHART. 1987. Cubic-foot volume equations for loblolly pine trees in cutover, site prepared plantations. South. J. Appl. For. 11:190-192.
2. AMATEIS, R.L., H.E. BURKUART, AND T.A. WALSH. 1989. Diameter increment and survival equations for loblolly pine trees growing in thinned and unthinned plantations on cutover, site-prepared lands. South. J. Appl. For. 13:170-174.
3. BIRDSEY, R. 1990. Updating methods for forest inventories - an overview. P. 429-435 in State-of-the-art methodology of forest inventory: A symposium proceedings, LaBau, V.J., and T. Cunia (eds.). USDA For. Serv, Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-263.
4. BURKHART, H.E. 1993. Tree and stand models in forest inventory, p. 164-170 in Proc. Ilvessalo symposium on national forest inventories, Nyyssonen, A., S. Poso, and J. Rautala (eds.). Finnish For. Res. Inst. Res. Pap. 444.
5. BURKHART, H.E., AND P.T. SPRINZ. 1984. Compatible cubic volume and basal area projection equations for thinned old-field loblolly pine plantations. For. Sci. 30:86-93.
6. BURKHART, H.E., K.D. FARRAR, R.L. AMATEIS, AND R.F. DANIELS. 1987. Simulation of individual tree growth and stand development in loblolly pine plantations on cutover, site-prepared areas. Va. Polytech. Inst. & State Univ., School of For. and Wildl. Resour., Publ. No. FWS-1-87. 47 p.
7. CLUTTER, J. L., W.R. HARMS, G.H. BRISTER, AND J.W. RHENEY. 1984. Stand structure and yields of site-prepared loblolly pine plantations in the lower coastal plain of the Carolinas, Georgia and North Florida. Asheville, NC, USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-27. 173 p.
8. DYER, M.E., AND H.E. BURKHART. 1987. Compatible crown ratio and crown height models. Can. J. For. Res. 17:572-574.
9. FRAZIER, J.R. 1981. Compatible whole-stand and diameter distribution models for loblolly pine plantations. Ph.D. Diss., Va. Polytech. Inst. & State Univ., Blacksburg, VA. 125 p.
10. KNOEBEL, B.R., AND H.E. BURKHART. 1991. A bivariate distribution approach to modeling forest diameter distributions at two points in time. Biometrics 47:241-253.
11. SMALLEY, G.W., AND R.L. BAILEY. 1974. Yield tables and stand structure for loblolly pine plantations in Tennessee, Alabama, and Georgia highlands. USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap. SO-96. 81 p.
12. SULLIVAN, A.D., AND J. L. CLUTTER. 1972. A simultaneous growth and yield model for loblolly pine. For. Sci. 18:76-86.