Explicit Time-Scale Splitting Algorithm for Stiff Problems: Auto-ignition of Gaseous Mixtures behind a Steady Shock

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 169, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 44-79

  Valorani, Mauro ^a   Goussis, Dimitrios A ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Chemical kinetics; Computational singular perturbation; Ordinary differential equation; Partial differential equation; Stiffness

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL EFFICIENCY; SHOCK WAVES; STIFFNESS; TIME MEASUREMENT;

AUTOIGNITIONS; COMPUTATIONAL SINGULAR PERTURBATION; EXPLICIT SCHEME; GASEOUS MIXTURE; PERFORMANCE; SLOW-TIME; SPLITTING ALGORITHMS; STIFF PROBLEM; STIFF SYSTEMS; TIME-SCALES;

ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS;

EID: 0006106780     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.2001.6709     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Gear W. Numerical Initial Value Problems in Ordinary Differential Equations. 1971.
2. Mitchell R. E., Kee R. J. A General Purpose Computer Code for Predicting Chemical Kinetic Behavior Behind Incident and Reflected Shocks. 1990.
3. Kee R. J., Groar J. F., Smooke M. D., Miller J. A. A FORTRAN Code for Modeling Steady Laminar One-Dimensional Premixed Flames. 1990.
4. Radhakrishnan K. LSENS A General Chemical Kinetics and Sensitivity Analysis Code for Homogeneous Gas-Phase Reactions. 1994.
5. Candler G. V., MacCormack R. W. The Computation of Hypersonic Ionized Flows in Chemical and Thermal Non-Equilibrium. 1988.
6. Rakich J. V., Bailey H. E., Park C. AIAA J. 21:1983;834.
7. Grossman B., Cinnella P. J. Comput. Phys. 88:1990;131.
8. Baum M., Poinsot T. J., Haworth D. C., Darabiha N. J. Fluid Mech. 281:1994;1.
9. Najm H. N., Wyckoff P. S., Knio O. M. J. Comput. Phys. 143:1998;381.
10. Oran E. S., Young T. R., Boris J. P., Cohen A. Combust. and Flames. 48:1982;135.
11. Oran E. S., Boris J. P. Numerical Simulation of Reacting Flows. 1987.
12. Bourlioux A., Majda A. J. Combust. Flame. 90:1992;211.
13. Yee H. C., Shinn J. L. AIAA J. 27:1989;299.
14. Bussing T. R. A., Murman E. M. AIAA J. 26:1988;1070.
15. Miranker W. L. Numerical Methods for Stiff Equations and Singular Perturbation Problems. 1981.
16. N. Peters, Systematic reduction of flame kinetics: Principles and details, in, Fluid Dynamics of Combustion Theory, edited by, M. Onofri and A. Tesei, Longman, Harlow/New York, 1990, p, 232.
17. Chen J. Y. Combust. Sci. 57:1988;89.
18. N. Peters, and, B. Rogg, Reduced Kinetic Mechanisms for Applications in Combustion Systems, edited by, N. Peters and B. Rogg, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993.
19. M. Smooke, Reduced Kinetic Mechanisms and Asymptotic Approximations for Methane-Air Flames, edited by, M. Smooke, Springer Lecture Notes, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991.
20. Maas U., Pope S. B. Implementation of simplified chemical kinetics based on intrinsic low-dimensional manifolds. 24th Symposium (Intl.) on Combustion. 1992;103.
21. Massias A., Diamantis D., Mastorakos E., Goussis D. A. Combust. Flame. 117:1999;685.
22. Massias A., Diamantis D., Mastorakos E., Goussis D. A. Combust. Theory Model. 3:1999;233.
23. Lebedev V. I. Explicit difference schemes with time-variable steps for solution of stiff systems of equations, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1196, Numerical Analysis and its Applications. 1997;Springer-Verlag, Berlin. p. 274-283.
24. Medovikov A. A. High order explicit methods for parabolic equations. BIT. 38:1998;372.
25. Verwer J. G. Explicit Runge-Kutta methods for parabolic partial differential equations. Appl. Numer. Math. 22:1996;359.
26. S. H. Lam, Singular perturbation for stiff equations using numerical methods, in, Recent Advances in the Aerospace Sciences, edited by, Corrado, Casci, Plenum, New York and London, 1985, p, 3.
27. Lam S. H., Goussis D. A. Understanding complex chemical kinetics with computational singular perturbation. 22nd Symposium (Intl.) on Combustion. 1988;931.
28. S. H. Lam, and, D. A. Goussis, Conventional asymptotic and computational singular perturbation for simplified kinetics modelling, in, Reduced Kinetic Mechanisms and Asymptotic Approximations for Methane-Air Flames, edited by, M. O. Smooke, Springer Lecture Notes 384, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991.
29. Trevino C., Mendez F. Reduced kinetic mechanism for methane ignition. 24th Symposium (Intl.) on Combustion. 1988;121.
30. Goussis D. A., Lam S. H. A Study of homogeneous methanol oxidation kinetic using CSP. 24th Symposium (Intl.) on Combustion. 1992;113.
31. Y. Katsabanis, and, D. A. Goussis, Constructing Reduced Chemical Kinetic Mechanisms, in, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Combustion Technologies, Portugal, 1995, p, 32.
32. Goussis D. A. J. Comput. Phys. 128:1996;261.
33. Ardema M. D. Computational Singular Perturbation Method for Dynamic Systems. IFAC Workshop on Singular Perturbations and Asymptotic Methods in Systems and Controls. 1989.
34. Ardema M. D. Computational singular perturbation for optimal control. 1990 Control Conference. 1990.
35. Rao A. V., Mease K. D. A New Method for Solving Optimal Control Problems. Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference. 1994;818.
36. Hadjinicolaou M., Goussis D. A. Asymptotic solution of stiff PDEs with the CSP method - The reaction diffusion equation. SIAM J. Sci. Comp. 20:1999;781.
37. Lam S. H. Combust. Sci. Technol. 89:1993;375.
38. Lam S. H., Goussis D. A. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 26:1994;461.
39. Lam S. H. Reduced chemistry modeling and sensitivity analysis. Lecture Notes for Aerothermochemistry for Hypersonic Technology. April 24-28, 1995;1994-1995.
40. Lam S. H., Goussis D. A. The Analytical Foundation of CSP. Oct. 1991.
41. Van Dyke M. Perturbation Methods in Fluid Mechanics. 1975.
42. D. A. Goussis, S. H. Lam, and, P. A. Gnoffo, Reduced and simplified chemical kinetics for air dissociation using computational singular perturbation, AIAA Paper 90-0644, presented at the 28th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada, 1990.
43. Eden A., Foias C., Nicolaenko B., Temam R. Exponential Attractors for Dissipative Evolution Equations. 1994.
44. Jennings A., Mc Keown J. J. Matrix Computation. 1992.
45. Wilkinson J. H. The Algebraic Eigenvalue Problem. 1992.
46. Shapiro A. H. Compressible Fluid Flows. 1953.
47. Fickett W., Davis W. C. Detonation. 1979.
48. A. C. Hindmarsh, and, Odepack, A systematized collection of ODE solvers, in, Scientific Computing, edited by, R. S. Stepleman, et al, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1983, p, 55.
49. Jachimovski C. J. An Analytical Study of the Hydrogen-Air Mechanism With Application to Scramjet Combustion. 1988.
50. B. Serauskas, T. Bowman, G. Smith, D. Golden, B. Gardiner, and, V. Lissianski, GRI Mechanism for Methane/Air, Version 1.1, available at, http://www.me.berkeley.edu/gri.mech .
51. Yungster S., Rabinowitz M. J. Numerical Study of Shock-Induced Combustion in Methane-Air Mixtures. 29th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit. 1993.
52. Turkel E. Review of Preconditioning Methods for Fluid Dynamics. 1992.
53. Higham D. J. IMA J. Num. Anal. 9:1989;1.
54. Shroff G. M., Keller H. B. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 30:1993;1099.
55. Shampine L. F. Comput. Math. Appl. 12B:1986;1287.
56. Ascher U. M., Chin H., Reich S. Numer. Math. 67:1994;131.
57. Gear C. W. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 7:1986;734.
58. Gordon S., McBride B. J. Computer Program for Calculation of Complex Equilibrium Compositions, Rocket Performance, Incident and Reflected Shocks, and Chapman-Jouguet Detonations. 1971.