Rules and regulations in maritime collision avoidance: New directions for bridge team training

Journal of Navigation

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 67-72

  Taylor, Donald H ^a  

^a SOUTHAMPTON SOLENT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bridge Team Training; Collision Avoidance

Indexed keywords

EID: 0006049002     PISSN: 03734633     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0373463397007686     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Plant, G. (1996). The collision avoidance regulations as a regulator of international navigation rights: underlying principles and their adequacy for the twenty-first century. This Journal, 49, 377-393.
2. Syms, R. J. (1994). Rules for the 21st century. Seaways, September and October.
3. Thomas, D. (1994). Dual action v. the Rules. Seaways, November.
4. Perkins, C. J. and Redfern, A. (1996). Requirements for coordination and the application of an automatic collision avoidance system. This Journal, 49, 129-135.
5. Cockroft, N. (1994). Colregs - case against major change. Seaways, December.
6. Peters, R. S. (1958). The Concept of Motivation. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
7. Hargreaves, D. H. (1980).Common-sense models of action. In Models of Man (A. J. Chapman and D. M. Jones, eds.) British Psychological Society, Leicester.
8. Perrow, C. (1984). Normal Accidents. Basic Books, New York.
9. McCregor, D. (1959). The Human Side of Enterprise. McGraw-Hill, New York.